Cargando…

Association between atrial fibrillation and healthcare costs among patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices

FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: Previous research on atrial fibrillation (AF)-related healthcare cost is limited by claims-derived categorization of AF diagnosis and does not assess for incremental differences in cost based on degree of AF burden. OBJECTIVE: To d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peigh, G, Zhou, J, Roberts, A I, Rosemas, S C, Longacre, C, Schwab, G, Soderlund, D, Passman, R S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10206833/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.019
_version_ 1785046314497605632
author Peigh, G
Zhou, J
Roberts, A I
Rosemas, S C
Longacre, C
Schwab, G
Soderlund, D
Passman, R S
author_facet Peigh, G
Zhou, J
Roberts, A I
Rosemas, S C
Longacre, C
Schwab, G
Soderlund, D
Passman, R S
author_sort Peigh, G
collection PubMed
description FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: Previous research on atrial fibrillation (AF)-related healthcare cost is limited by claims-derived categorization of AF diagnosis and does not assess for incremental differences in cost based on degree of AF burden. OBJECTIVE: To directly assess the incremental cost of device detected AF (ddAF), and compare relative costs among cohorts with no AF, paroxysmal AF (pAF), persistent AF (PeAF), and permanent AF (PermAF) in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) capable of sensitive and continuous atrial arrhythmia detection. METHODS: Using the de-identified Optum® Clinformatics® U.S. claims database (2015 to 2020) linked with the Medtronic CareLink® database, we identified CIED patients that transmitted data ≥6 months post-implant (baseline period). Annualized per-patient costs in follow up were analyzed from insurance claims and adjusted to 2020 US Dollars. Total costs were compared between patients with no AF and those with device detected pAF, PeAF and PermAF. Analyses were adjusted for geographical region, insurance type, CHA2DS2-VASc Score, and implant year. RESULTS: Of the 21,391 patients (72.9±10.9 yrs; 56.3% male) analyzed, 7,798 (36.5%) had ddAF. Among these, 5,966 (76.5%) were pAF (avg burden 2.9±8.6%), 1,145 (14.7%) were PeAF (avg burden 47.2±29.9%), and 687 (8.8%) were PermAF (avg burden 99.3±0.7%). Patients with ddAF had higher overall annualized total healthcare costs than those without ddAF (fig). The incremental annualized increased cost in those with ddAF was $12,789 ± $161,749 per patient. Patients with pAF, PeAF and PermAF all had higher adjusted healthcare costs than those without AF (p for all <0.001). Patients with PeAF and PermAF both had higher total adjusted costs than patients with pAF. In addition, patients with PeAF had higher healthcare costs than those with PermAF (fig). CONCLUSIONS: In the present analysis of CIED patients, ddAF was associated with increased healthcare costs after adjustment for clinical and demographic covariates. Among those with ddAF, patients with PeAF had the highest healthcare costs. Preventing development of AF, and progression to PeAF, may reduce healthcare costs. [Figure: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10206833
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102068332023-05-25 Association between atrial fibrillation and healthcare costs among patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices Peigh, G Zhou, J Roberts, A I Rosemas, S C Longacre, C Schwab, G Soderlund, D Passman, R S Europace 10.2 - Epidemiology, Prognosis, Outcome FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: Previous research on atrial fibrillation (AF)-related healthcare cost is limited by claims-derived categorization of AF diagnosis and does not assess for incremental differences in cost based on degree of AF burden. OBJECTIVE: To directly assess the incremental cost of device detected AF (ddAF), and compare relative costs among cohorts with no AF, paroxysmal AF (pAF), persistent AF (PeAF), and permanent AF (PermAF) in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) capable of sensitive and continuous atrial arrhythmia detection. METHODS: Using the de-identified Optum® Clinformatics® U.S. claims database (2015 to 2020) linked with the Medtronic CareLink® database, we identified CIED patients that transmitted data ≥6 months post-implant (baseline period). Annualized per-patient costs in follow up were analyzed from insurance claims and adjusted to 2020 US Dollars. Total costs were compared between patients with no AF and those with device detected pAF, PeAF and PermAF. Analyses were adjusted for geographical region, insurance type, CHA2DS2-VASc Score, and implant year. RESULTS: Of the 21,391 patients (72.9±10.9 yrs; 56.3% male) analyzed, 7,798 (36.5%) had ddAF. Among these, 5,966 (76.5%) were pAF (avg burden 2.9±8.6%), 1,145 (14.7%) were PeAF (avg burden 47.2±29.9%), and 687 (8.8%) were PermAF (avg burden 99.3±0.7%). Patients with ddAF had higher overall annualized total healthcare costs than those without ddAF (fig). The incremental annualized increased cost in those with ddAF was $12,789 ± $161,749 per patient. Patients with pAF, PeAF and PermAF all had higher adjusted healthcare costs than those without AF (p for all <0.001). Patients with PeAF and PermAF both had higher total adjusted costs than patients with pAF. In addition, patients with PeAF had higher healthcare costs than those with PermAF (fig). CONCLUSIONS: In the present analysis of CIED patients, ddAF was associated with increased healthcare costs after adjustment for clinical and demographic covariates. Among those with ddAF, patients with PeAF had the highest healthcare costs. Preventing development of AF, and progression to PeAF, may reduce healthcare costs. [Figure: see text] Oxford University Press 2023-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10206833/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.019 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle 10.2 - Epidemiology, Prognosis, Outcome
Peigh, G
Zhou, J
Roberts, A I
Rosemas, S C
Longacre, C
Schwab, G
Soderlund, D
Passman, R S
Association between atrial fibrillation and healthcare costs among patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
title Association between atrial fibrillation and healthcare costs among patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
title_full Association between atrial fibrillation and healthcare costs among patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
title_fullStr Association between atrial fibrillation and healthcare costs among patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
title_full_unstemmed Association between atrial fibrillation and healthcare costs among patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
title_short Association between atrial fibrillation and healthcare costs among patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
title_sort association between atrial fibrillation and healthcare costs among patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
topic 10.2 - Epidemiology, Prognosis, Outcome
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10206833/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.019
work_keys_str_mv AT peighg associationbetweenatrialfibrillationandhealthcarecostsamongpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevices
AT zhouj associationbetweenatrialfibrillationandhealthcarecostsamongpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevices
AT robertsai associationbetweenatrialfibrillationandhealthcarecostsamongpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevices
AT rosemassc associationbetweenatrialfibrillationandhealthcarecostsamongpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevices
AT longacrec associationbetweenatrialfibrillationandhealthcarecostsamongpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevices
AT schwabg associationbetweenatrialfibrillationandhealthcarecostsamongpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevices
AT soderlundd associationbetweenatrialfibrillationandhealthcarecostsamongpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevices
AT passmanrs associationbetweenatrialfibrillationandhealthcarecostsamongpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevices