Cargando…

Impact of left ventricular scar burden on response to two different modalities of conduction system CRT

FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): British Heart Foundation INTRODUCTION: Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) in the form of His bundle CRT and left bundle area CRT can be more effective than the gold standard, biventricular pacing (BVP). In BV...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ali, N A D I N E, Arnold, A D, Miyazawa, A A A, Keene, D, Chow, J J, Peters, N S, Kanagaratnam, P, Qureshi, N, Ng, F S, Lefroy, D, Francis, D P, Shun-Shin, M, Cole, G D, Whinnett, Z I
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10206847/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.465
Descripción
Sumario:FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): British Heart Foundation INTRODUCTION: Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) in the form of His bundle CRT and left bundle area CRT can be more effective than the gold standard, biventricular pacing (BVP). In BVP scar burden is known to predict response whether this is true for these novel modalities is not known. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether left ventricular scar burden assessed using cardiac MRI can be used to predict the electrical and acute haemodynamic response to two novel CRT modalities. METHODS: Patients with standard CRT indications were recruited. They underwent a pre-procedure cardiac MRI, with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) to quantify scar. His bundle CRT (His CRT) and left bundle area CRT (LBA CRT) were attempted. The electrical response was measured using high precision non-invasive mapping ECGi (CardioInsight, Medtronic). The haemodynamic response was measured with a high precision protocol. We investigated the impact of scar and baseline electrical characteristic on ECGi and haemodynamic response. RESULTS: 26 patients were recruited (85% male, mean age 69 ± 10, with ischaemic cardiomyopathy in 35%). LGE was observed in 96% of cases and the mean (range 1-39%). We found a significant correlation between scar extent and the electrical response with both modalities. There was a significant correlation between a lower scar burden and better electrical response. For His CRT the reduction in left ventricular activation time was better with lower scar burden (R= 0.77, p < 0.01, Picture 1), for LBA CRT for reduction in left ventricular activation was also better with lower scar burden (R = 0.53, p = 0.05, Picture 2). With His CRT there was also a significant correlation between lower scar extent and better acute haemodynamic response ( R = 0.6, p = 0.002) but this was not observed with LBA CRT (R = 0.07, p = 0.77). CONCLUSION: Left ventricular myocardial scar can be used to predict the electrical response to two different conduction system CRT modalities. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text]