Cargando…
Impact of left ventricular scar burden on response to two different modalities of conduction system CRT
FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): British Heart Foundation INTRODUCTION: Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) in the form of His bundle CRT and left bundle area CRT can be more effective than the gold standard, biventricular pacing (BVP). In BV...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10206847/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.465 |
_version_ | 1785046316845367296 |
---|---|
author | Ali, N A D I N E Arnold, A D Miyazawa, A A A Keene, D Chow, J J Peters, N S Kanagaratnam, P Qureshi, N Ng, F S Lefroy, D Francis, D P Shun-Shin, M Cole, G D Whinnett, Z I |
author_facet | Ali, N A D I N E Arnold, A D Miyazawa, A A A Keene, D Chow, J J Peters, N S Kanagaratnam, P Qureshi, N Ng, F S Lefroy, D Francis, D P Shun-Shin, M Cole, G D Whinnett, Z I |
author_sort | Ali, N A D I N E |
collection | PubMed |
description | FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): British Heart Foundation INTRODUCTION: Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) in the form of His bundle CRT and left bundle area CRT can be more effective than the gold standard, biventricular pacing (BVP). In BVP scar burden is known to predict response whether this is true for these novel modalities is not known. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether left ventricular scar burden assessed using cardiac MRI can be used to predict the electrical and acute haemodynamic response to two novel CRT modalities. METHODS: Patients with standard CRT indications were recruited. They underwent a pre-procedure cardiac MRI, with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) to quantify scar. His bundle CRT (His CRT) and left bundle area CRT (LBA CRT) were attempted. The electrical response was measured using high precision non-invasive mapping ECGi (CardioInsight, Medtronic). The haemodynamic response was measured with a high precision protocol. We investigated the impact of scar and baseline electrical characteristic on ECGi and haemodynamic response. RESULTS: 26 patients were recruited (85% male, mean age 69 ± 10, with ischaemic cardiomyopathy in 35%). LGE was observed in 96% of cases and the mean (range 1-39%). We found a significant correlation between scar extent and the electrical response with both modalities. There was a significant correlation between a lower scar burden and better electrical response. For His CRT the reduction in left ventricular activation time was better with lower scar burden (R= 0.77, p < 0.01, Picture 1), for LBA CRT for reduction in left ventricular activation was also better with lower scar burden (R = 0.53, p = 0.05, Picture 2). With His CRT there was also a significant correlation between lower scar extent and better acute haemodynamic response ( R = 0.6, p = 0.002) but this was not observed with LBA CRT (R = 0.07, p = 0.77). CONCLUSION: Left ventricular myocardial scar can be used to predict the electrical response to two different conduction system CRT modalities. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10206847 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102068472023-05-25 Impact of left ventricular scar burden on response to two different modalities of conduction system CRT Ali, N A D I N E Arnold, A D Miyazawa, A A A Keene, D Chow, J J Peters, N S Kanagaratnam, P Qureshi, N Ng, F S Lefroy, D Francis, D P Shun-Shin, M Cole, G D Whinnett, Z I Europace 14.3 - Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy (CRT) FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): British Heart Foundation INTRODUCTION: Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) in the form of His bundle CRT and left bundle area CRT can be more effective than the gold standard, biventricular pacing (BVP). In BVP scar burden is known to predict response whether this is true for these novel modalities is not known. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether left ventricular scar burden assessed using cardiac MRI can be used to predict the electrical and acute haemodynamic response to two novel CRT modalities. METHODS: Patients with standard CRT indications were recruited. They underwent a pre-procedure cardiac MRI, with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) to quantify scar. His bundle CRT (His CRT) and left bundle area CRT (LBA CRT) were attempted. The electrical response was measured using high precision non-invasive mapping ECGi (CardioInsight, Medtronic). The haemodynamic response was measured with a high precision protocol. We investigated the impact of scar and baseline electrical characteristic on ECGi and haemodynamic response. RESULTS: 26 patients were recruited (85% male, mean age 69 ± 10, with ischaemic cardiomyopathy in 35%). LGE was observed in 96% of cases and the mean (range 1-39%). We found a significant correlation between scar extent and the electrical response with both modalities. There was a significant correlation between a lower scar burden and better electrical response. For His CRT the reduction in left ventricular activation time was better with lower scar burden (R= 0.77, p < 0.01, Picture 1), for LBA CRT for reduction in left ventricular activation was also better with lower scar burden (R = 0.53, p = 0.05, Picture 2). With His CRT there was also a significant correlation between lower scar extent and better acute haemodynamic response ( R = 0.6, p = 0.002) but this was not observed with LBA CRT (R = 0.07, p = 0.77). CONCLUSION: Left ventricular myocardial scar can be used to predict the electrical response to two different conduction system CRT modalities. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] Oxford University Press 2023-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10206847/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.465 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | 14.3 - Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy (CRT) Ali, N A D I N E Arnold, A D Miyazawa, A A A Keene, D Chow, J J Peters, N S Kanagaratnam, P Qureshi, N Ng, F S Lefroy, D Francis, D P Shun-Shin, M Cole, G D Whinnett, Z I Impact of left ventricular scar burden on response to two different modalities of conduction system CRT |
title | Impact of left ventricular scar burden on response to two different modalities of conduction system CRT |
title_full | Impact of left ventricular scar burden on response to two different modalities of conduction system CRT |
title_fullStr | Impact of left ventricular scar burden on response to two different modalities of conduction system CRT |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of left ventricular scar burden on response to two different modalities of conduction system CRT |
title_short | Impact of left ventricular scar burden on response to two different modalities of conduction system CRT |
title_sort | impact of left ventricular scar burden on response to two different modalities of conduction system crt |
topic | 14.3 - Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy (CRT) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10206847/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.465 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alinadine impactofleftventricularscarburdenonresponsetotwodifferentmodalitiesofconductionsystemcrt AT arnoldad impactofleftventricularscarburdenonresponsetotwodifferentmodalitiesofconductionsystemcrt AT miyazawaaaa impactofleftventricularscarburdenonresponsetotwodifferentmodalitiesofconductionsystemcrt AT keened impactofleftventricularscarburdenonresponsetotwodifferentmodalitiesofconductionsystemcrt AT chowjj impactofleftventricularscarburdenonresponsetotwodifferentmodalitiesofconductionsystemcrt AT petersns impactofleftventricularscarburdenonresponsetotwodifferentmodalitiesofconductionsystemcrt AT kanagaratnamp impactofleftventricularscarburdenonresponsetotwodifferentmodalitiesofconductionsystemcrt AT qureshin impactofleftventricularscarburdenonresponsetotwodifferentmodalitiesofconductionsystemcrt AT ngfs impactofleftventricularscarburdenonresponsetotwodifferentmodalitiesofconductionsystemcrt AT lefroyd impactofleftventricularscarburdenonresponsetotwodifferentmodalitiesofconductionsystemcrt AT francisdp impactofleftventricularscarburdenonresponsetotwodifferentmodalitiesofconductionsystemcrt AT shunshinm impactofleftventricularscarburdenonresponsetotwodifferentmodalitiesofconductionsystemcrt AT colegd impactofleftventricularscarburdenonresponsetotwodifferentmodalitiesofconductionsystemcrt AT whinnettzi impactofleftventricularscarburdenonresponsetotwodifferentmodalitiesofconductionsystemcrt |