Cargando…

Impact of left ventricular scar burden on response to two different modalities of conduction system CRT

FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): British Heart Foundation INTRODUCTION: Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) in the form of His bundle CRT and left bundle area CRT can be more effective than the gold standard, biventricular pacing (BVP). In BV...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ali, N A D I N E, Arnold, A D, Miyazawa, A A A, Keene, D, Chow, J J, Peters, N S, Kanagaratnam, P, Qureshi, N, Ng, F S, Lefroy, D, Francis, D P, Shun-Shin, M, Cole, G D, Whinnett, Z I
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10206847/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.465
_version_ 1785046316845367296
author Ali, N A D I N E
Arnold, A D
Miyazawa, A A A
Keene, D
Chow, J J
Peters, N S
Kanagaratnam, P
Qureshi, N
Ng, F S
Lefroy, D
Francis, D P
Shun-Shin, M
Cole, G D
Whinnett, Z I
author_facet Ali, N A D I N E
Arnold, A D
Miyazawa, A A A
Keene, D
Chow, J J
Peters, N S
Kanagaratnam, P
Qureshi, N
Ng, F S
Lefroy, D
Francis, D P
Shun-Shin, M
Cole, G D
Whinnett, Z I
author_sort Ali, N A D I N E
collection PubMed
description FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): British Heart Foundation INTRODUCTION: Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) in the form of His bundle CRT and left bundle area CRT can be more effective than the gold standard, biventricular pacing (BVP). In BVP scar burden is known to predict response whether this is true for these novel modalities is not known. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether left ventricular scar burden assessed using cardiac MRI can be used to predict the electrical and acute haemodynamic response to two novel CRT modalities. METHODS: Patients with standard CRT indications were recruited. They underwent a pre-procedure cardiac MRI, with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) to quantify scar. His bundle CRT (His CRT) and left bundle area CRT (LBA CRT) were attempted. The electrical response was measured using high precision non-invasive mapping ECGi (CardioInsight, Medtronic). The haemodynamic response was measured with a high precision protocol. We investigated the impact of scar and baseline electrical characteristic on ECGi and haemodynamic response. RESULTS: 26 patients were recruited (85% male, mean age 69 ± 10, with ischaemic cardiomyopathy in 35%). LGE was observed in 96% of cases and the mean (range 1-39%). We found a significant correlation between scar extent and the electrical response with both modalities. There was a significant correlation between a lower scar burden and better electrical response. For His CRT the reduction in left ventricular activation time was better with lower scar burden (R= 0.77, p < 0.01, Picture 1), for LBA CRT for reduction in left ventricular activation was also better with lower scar burden (R = 0.53, p = 0.05, Picture 2). With His CRT there was also a significant correlation between lower scar extent and better acute haemodynamic response ( R = 0.6, p = 0.002) but this was not observed with LBA CRT (R = 0.07, p = 0.77). CONCLUSION: Left ventricular myocardial scar can be used to predict the electrical response to two different conduction system CRT modalities. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10206847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102068472023-05-25 Impact of left ventricular scar burden on response to two different modalities of conduction system CRT Ali, N A D I N E Arnold, A D Miyazawa, A A A Keene, D Chow, J J Peters, N S Kanagaratnam, P Qureshi, N Ng, F S Lefroy, D Francis, D P Shun-Shin, M Cole, G D Whinnett, Z I Europace 14.3 - Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy (CRT) FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): British Heart Foundation INTRODUCTION: Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) in the form of His bundle CRT and left bundle area CRT can be more effective than the gold standard, biventricular pacing (BVP). In BVP scar burden is known to predict response whether this is true for these novel modalities is not known. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether left ventricular scar burden assessed using cardiac MRI can be used to predict the electrical and acute haemodynamic response to two novel CRT modalities. METHODS: Patients with standard CRT indications were recruited. They underwent a pre-procedure cardiac MRI, with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) to quantify scar. His bundle CRT (His CRT) and left bundle area CRT (LBA CRT) were attempted. The electrical response was measured using high precision non-invasive mapping ECGi (CardioInsight, Medtronic). The haemodynamic response was measured with a high precision protocol. We investigated the impact of scar and baseline electrical characteristic on ECGi and haemodynamic response. RESULTS: 26 patients were recruited (85% male, mean age 69 ± 10, with ischaemic cardiomyopathy in 35%). LGE was observed in 96% of cases and the mean (range 1-39%). We found a significant correlation between scar extent and the electrical response with both modalities. There was a significant correlation between a lower scar burden and better electrical response. For His CRT the reduction in left ventricular activation time was better with lower scar burden (R= 0.77, p < 0.01, Picture 1), for LBA CRT for reduction in left ventricular activation was also better with lower scar burden (R = 0.53, p = 0.05, Picture 2). With His CRT there was also a significant correlation between lower scar extent and better acute haemodynamic response ( R = 0.6, p = 0.002) but this was not observed with LBA CRT (R = 0.07, p = 0.77). CONCLUSION: Left ventricular myocardial scar can be used to predict the electrical response to two different conduction system CRT modalities. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] Oxford University Press 2023-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10206847/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.465 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle 14.3 - Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy (CRT)
Ali, N A D I N E
Arnold, A D
Miyazawa, A A A
Keene, D
Chow, J J
Peters, N S
Kanagaratnam, P
Qureshi, N
Ng, F S
Lefroy, D
Francis, D P
Shun-Shin, M
Cole, G D
Whinnett, Z I
Impact of left ventricular scar burden on response to two different modalities of conduction system CRT
title Impact of left ventricular scar burden on response to two different modalities of conduction system CRT
title_full Impact of left ventricular scar burden on response to two different modalities of conduction system CRT
title_fullStr Impact of left ventricular scar burden on response to two different modalities of conduction system CRT
title_full_unstemmed Impact of left ventricular scar burden on response to two different modalities of conduction system CRT
title_short Impact of left ventricular scar burden on response to two different modalities of conduction system CRT
title_sort impact of left ventricular scar burden on response to two different modalities of conduction system crt
topic 14.3 - Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy (CRT)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10206847/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.465
work_keys_str_mv AT alinadine impactofleftventricularscarburdenonresponsetotwodifferentmodalitiesofconductionsystemcrt
AT arnoldad impactofleftventricularscarburdenonresponsetotwodifferentmodalitiesofconductionsystemcrt
AT miyazawaaaa impactofleftventricularscarburdenonresponsetotwodifferentmodalitiesofconductionsystemcrt
AT keened impactofleftventricularscarburdenonresponsetotwodifferentmodalitiesofconductionsystemcrt
AT chowjj impactofleftventricularscarburdenonresponsetotwodifferentmodalitiesofconductionsystemcrt
AT petersns impactofleftventricularscarburdenonresponsetotwodifferentmodalitiesofconductionsystemcrt
AT kanagaratnamp impactofleftventricularscarburdenonresponsetotwodifferentmodalitiesofconductionsystemcrt
AT qureshin impactofleftventricularscarburdenonresponsetotwodifferentmodalitiesofconductionsystemcrt
AT ngfs impactofleftventricularscarburdenonresponsetotwodifferentmodalitiesofconductionsystemcrt
AT lefroyd impactofleftventricularscarburdenonresponsetotwodifferentmodalitiesofconductionsystemcrt
AT francisdp impactofleftventricularscarburdenonresponsetotwodifferentmodalitiesofconductionsystemcrt
AT shunshinm impactofleftventricularscarburdenonresponsetotwodifferentmodalitiesofconductionsystemcrt
AT colegd impactofleftventricularscarburdenonresponsetotwodifferentmodalitiesofconductionsystemcrt
AT whinnettzi impactofleftventricularscarburdenonresponsetotwodifferentmodalitiesofconductionsystemcrt