Cargando…

Pulsed-field- vs. cryo- vs. radiofrequency ablation: one-year recurrence rates after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: A multipolar pulsed-field ablation (PFA) catheter has recently been introduced and showed favorable data in terms of safety and procedural efficiency of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF). Long-term outcome...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kueffer, T, Madaffari, A, Muehl, A, Maurhofer, J, Stefenova, A, Seiler, J, Thalmann, G, Kozhuharov, N A, Servatius, H, Tanner, H, Haeberlin, A, Baldinger, S H, Noti, F, Roten, L, Reichlin, T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10206883/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.157
_version_ 1785046323972538368
author Kueffer, T
Madaffari, A
Muehl, A
Maurhofer, J
Stefenova, A
Seiler, J
Thalmann, G
Kozhuharov, N A
Servatius, H
Tanner, H
Haeberlin, A
Baldinger, S H
Noti, F
Roten, L
Reichlin, T
author_facet Kueffer, T
Madaffari, A
Muehl, A
Maurhofer, J
Stefenova, A
Seiler, J
Thalmann, G
Kozhuharov, N A
Servatius, H
Tanner, H
Haeberlin, A
Baldinger, S H
Noti, F
Roten, L
Reichlin, T
author_sort Kueffer, T
collection PubMed
description FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: A multipolar pulsed-field ablation (PFA) catheter has recently been introduced and showed favorable data in terms of safety and procedural efficiency of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF). Long-term outcome data in comparison to other ablation modalities however is lacking. PURPOSE: To compare procedural and one-year recurrence data of patients with paroxysmal AF (paroxAF) undergoing a first PVI using PFA, cryoballoon ablation (Cryo), or radiofrequency (RFA). METHODS: Consecutive patients with paroxAF undergoing a first PVI with PFA at our institution from May to December 2021 were included. For comparison, patients with paroxAF undergoing a first PVI with Cryo or RFA between May 2020 and March 2021 were included. A 3-D electro-anatomical mapping system was used in PFA and RFA, but not in Cryo. The following ablation protocols were used to achieve acute PVI: In the PFA group, the standard 32-applications lesion-set and supplementary applications at the discretion of the operator. In the Cryo group, a time-to-effect plus two minutes strategy and in the RFA group following to the CLOSE protocol. Patients were followed with 7d-Holter ECGs 3, 6, and 12 months after ablation. The primary endpoint was recurrence of any atrial arrhythmias following a blanking period of 3 months. RESULTS: A total of 202 patients were included (PFA: 32; Cryo: 82; RF: 88). Age, gender, CHA2DS2-VASc score, LVEF and LAVI did not differ among the groups (Table). Median procedure times were shortest with Cryo (76 [interquartile range 60-95] min) followed by PFA (94 [82-110] min) and RFA (157 [126-211] min, p < 0.01). Fluoroscopy dose was lowest with RFA (1.4 [0.6-2.5] Gycm2) followed by PFA (4.8 [3.5-7.9] Gycm2) and Cryo (5.3 [2.8-10.2] Gycm2, p < 0.01). Median follow-up time in patients without recurrence was 12 [10-12] months for the PFA group, 12 [12-13] months for the Cryo group and 13 [12-13] months for the RFA group. There was a trend towards fewer recurrences of atrial arrhythmias with PFA compared to Cryo and RFA (PFA 7%, Cryo: 25%, RFA: 20%, p = 0.13, Figure). CONCLUSION: Recurrences of atrial arrhythmias 12 months after PFA PVI for paroxAF may be lower compared to Cryo and RFA. Larger prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm this initial experience. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10206883
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102068832023-05-25 Pulsed-field- vs. cryo- vs. radiofrequency ablation: one-year recurrence rates after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation Kueffer, T Madaffari, A Muehl, A Maurhofer, J Stefenova, A Seiler, J Thalmann, G Kozhuharov, N A Servatius, H Tanner, H Haeberlin, A Baldinger, S H Noti, F Roten, L Reichlin, T Europace 10.4.5 - Rhythm Control, Catheter Ablation FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: A multipolar pulsed-field ablation (PFA) catheter has recently been introduced and showed favorable data in terms of safety and procedural efficiency of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF). Long-term outcome data in comparison to other ablation modalities however is lacking. PURPOSE: To compare procedural and one-year recurrence data of patients with paroxysmal AF (paroxAF) undergoing a first PVI using PFA, cryoballoon ablation (Cryo), or radiofrequency (RFA). METHODS: Consecutive patients with paroxAF undergoing a first PVI with PFA at our institution from May to December 2021 were included. For comparison, patients with paroxAF undergoing a first PVI with Cryo or RFA between May 2020 and March 2021 were included. A 3-D electro-anatomical mapping system was used in PFA and RFA, but not in Cryo. The following ablation protocols were used to achieve acute PVI: In the PFA group, the standard 32-applications lesion-set and supplementary applications at the discretion of the operator. In the Cryo group, a time-to-effect plus two minutes strategy and in the RFA group following to the CLOSE protocol. Patients were followed with 7d-Holter ECGs 3, 6, and 12 months after ablation. The primary endpoint was recurrence of any atrial arrhythmias following a blanking period of 3 months. RESULTS: A total of 202 patients were included (PFA: 32; Cryo: 82; RF: 88). Age, gender, CHA2DS2-VASc score, LVEF and LAVI did not differ among the groups (Table). Median procedure times were shortest with Cryo (76 [interquartile range 60-95] min) followed by PFA (94 [82-110] min) and RFA (157 [126-211] min, p < 0.01). Fluoroscopy dose was lowest with RFA (1.4 [0.6-2.5] Gycm2) followed by PFA (4.8 [3.5-7.9] Gycm2) and Cryo (5.3 [2.8-10.2] Gycm2, p < 0.01). Median follow-up time in patients without recurrence was 12 [10-12] months for the PFA group, 12 [12-13] months for the Cryo group and 13 [12-13] months for the RFA group. There was a trend towards fewer recurrences of atrial arrhythmias with PFA compared to Cryo and RFA (PFA 7%, Cryo: 25%, RFA: 20%, p = 0.13, Figure). CONCLUSION: Recurrences of atrial arrhythmias 12 months after PFA PVI for paroxAF may be lower compared to Cryo and RFA. Larger prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm this initial experience. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] Oxford University Press 2023-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10206883/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.157 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle 10.4.5 - Rhythm Control, Catheter Ablation
Kueffer, T
Madaffari, A
Muehl, A
Maurhofer, J
Stefenova, A
Seiler, J
Thalmann, G
Kozhuharov, N A
Servatius, H
Tanner, H
Haeberlin, A
Baldinger, S H
Noti, F
Roten, L
Reichlin, T
Pulsed-field- vs. cryo- vs. radiofrequency ablation: one-year recurrence rates after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
title Pulsed-field- vs. cryo- vs. radiofrequency ablation: one-year recurrence rates after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
title_full Pulsed-field- vs. cryo- vs. radiofrequency ablation: one-year recurrence rates after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
title_fullStr Pulsed-field- vs. cryo- vs. radiofrequency ablation: one-year recurrence rates after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
title_full_unstemmed Pulsed-field- vs. cryo- vs. radiofrequency ablation: one-year recurrence rates after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
title_short Pulsed-field- vs. cryo- vs. radiofrequency ablation: one-year recurrence rates after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
title_sort pulsed-field- vs. cryo- vs. radiofrequency ablation: one-year recurrence rates after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
topic 10.4.5 - Rhythm Control, Catheter Ablation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10206883/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.157
work_keys_str_mv AT kueffert pulsedfieldvscryovsradiofrequencyablationoneyearrecurrenceratesafterpulmonaryveinisolationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation
AT madaffaria pulsedfieldvscryovsradiofrequencyablationoneyearrecurrenceratesafterpulmonaryveinisolationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation
AT muehla pulsedfieldvscryovsradiofrequencyablationoneyearrecurrenceratesafterpulmonaryveinisolationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation
AT maurhoferj pulsedfieldvscryovsradiofrequencyablationoneyearrecurrenceratesafterpulmonaryveinisolationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation
AT stefenovaa pulsedfieldvscryovsradiofrequencyablationoneyearrecurrenceratesafterpulmonaryveinisolationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation
AT seilerj pulsedfieldvscryovsradiofrequencyablationoneyearrecurrenceratesafterpulmonaryveinisolationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation
AT thalmanng pulsedfieldvscryovsradiofrequencyablationoneyearrecurrenceratesafterpulmonaryveinisolationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation
AT kozhuharovna pulsedfieldvscryovsradiofrequencyablationoneyearrecurrenceratesafterpulmonaryveinisolationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation
AT servatiush pulsedfieldvscryovsradiofrequencyablationoneyearrecurrenceratesafterpulmonaryveinisolationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation
AT tannerh pulsedfieldvscryovsradiofrequencyablationoneyearrecurrenceratesafterpulmonaryveinisolationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation
AT haeberlina pulsedfieldvscryovsradiofrequencyablationoneyearrecurrenceratesafterpulmonaryveinisolationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation
AT baldingersh pulsedfieldvscryovsradiofrequencyablationoneyearrecurrenceratesafterpulmonaryveinisolationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation
AT notif pulsedfieldvscryovsradiofrequencyablationoneyearrecurrenceratesafterpulmonaryveinisolationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation
AT rotenl pulsedfieldvscryovsradiofrequencyablationoneyearrecurrenceratesafterpulmonaryveinisolationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation
AT reichlint pulsedfieldvscryovsradiofrequencyablationoneyearrecurrenceratesafterpulmonaryveinisolationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation