Cargando…
Pulsed-field- vs. cryo- vs. radiofrequency ablation: one-year recurrence rates after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: A multipolar pulsed-field ablation (PFA) catheter has recently been introduced and showed favorable data in terms of safety and procedural efficiency of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF). Long-term outcome...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10206883/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.157 |
_version_ | 1785046323972538368 |
---|---|
author | Kueffer, T Madaffari, A Muehl, A Maurhofer, J Stefenova, A Seiler, J Thalmann, G Kozhuharov, N A Servatius, H Tanner, H Haeberlin, A Baldinger, S H Noti, F Roten, L Reichlin, T |
author_facet | Kueffer, T Madaffari, A Muehl, A Maurhofer, J Stefenova, A Seiler, J Thalmann, G Kozhuharov, N A Servatius, H Tanner, H Haeberlin, A Baldinger, S H Noti, F Roten, L Reichlin, T |
author_sort | Kueffer, T |
collection | PubMed |
description | FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: A multipolar pulsed-field ablation (PFA) catheter has recently been introduced and showed favorable data in terms of safety and procedural efficiency of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF). Long-term outcome data in comparison to other ablation modalities however is lacking. PURPOSE: To compare procedural and one-year recurrence data of patients with paroxysmal AF (paroxAF) undergoing a first PVI using PFA, cryoballoon ablation (Cryo), or radiofrequency (RFA). METHODS: Consecutive patients with paroxAF undergoing a first PVI with PFA at our institution from May to December 2021 were included. For comparison, patients with paroxAF undergoing a first PVI with Cryo or RFA between May 2020 and March 2021 were included. A 3-D electro-anatomical mapping system was used in PFA and RFA, but not in Cryo. The following ablation protocols were used to achieve acute PVI: In the PFA group, the standard 32-applications lesion-set and supplementary applications at the discretion of the operator. In the Cryo group, a time-to-effect plus two minutes strategy and in the RFA group following to the CLOSE protocol. Patients were followed with 7d-Holter ECGs 3, 6, and 12 months after ablation. The primary endpoint was recurrence of any atrial arrhythmias following a blanking period of 3 months. RESULTS: A total of 202 patients were included (PFA: 32; Cryo: 82; RF: 88). Age, gender, CHA2DS2-VASc score, LVEF and LAVI did not differ among the groups (Table). Median procedure times were shortest with Cryo (76 [interquartile range 60-95] min) followed by PFA (94 [82-110] min) and RFA (157 [126-211] min, p < 0.01). Fluoroscopy dose was lowest with RFA (1.4 [0.6-2.5] Gycm2) followed by PFA (4.8 [3.5-7.9] Gycm2) and Cryo (5.3 [2.8-10.2] Gycm2, p < 0.01). Median follow-up time in patients without recurrence was 12 [10-12] months for the PFA group, 12 [12-13] months for the Cryo group and 13 [12-13] months for the RFA group. There was a trend towards fewer recurrences of atrial arrhythmias with PFA compared to Cryo and RFA (PFA 7%, Cryo: 25%, RFA: 20%, p = 0.13, Figure). CONCLUSION: Recurrences of atrial arrhythmias 12 months after PFA PVI for paroxAF may be lower compared to Cryo and RFA. Larger prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm this initial experience. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10206883 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102068832023-05-25 Pulsed-field- vs. cryo- vs. radiofrequency ablation: one-year recurrence rates after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation Kueffer, T Madaffari, A Muehl, A Maurhofer, J Stefenova, A Seiler, J Thalmann, G Kozhuharov, N A Servatius, H Tanner, H Haeberlin, A Baldinger, S H Noti, F Roten, L Reichlin, T Europace 10.4.5 - Rhythm Control, Catheter Ablation FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: A multipolar pulsed-field ablation (PFA) catheter has recently been introduced and showed favorable data in terms of safety and procedural efficiency of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF). Long-term outcome data in comparison to other ablation modalities however is lacking. PURPOSE: To compare procedural and one-year recurrence data of patients with paroxysmal AF (paroxAF) undergoing a first PVI using PFA, cryoballoon ablation (Cryo), or radiofrequency (RFA). METHODS: Consecutive patients with paroxAF undergoing a first PVI with PFA at our institution from May to December 2021 were included. For comparison, patients with paroxAF undergoing a first PVI with Cryo or RFA between May 2020 and March 2021 were included. A 3-D electro-anatomical mapping system was used in PFA and RFA, but not in Cryo. The following ablation protocols were used to achieve acute PVI: In the PFA group, the standard 32-applications lesion-set and supplementary applications at the discretion of the operator. In the Cryo group, a time-to-effect plus two minutes strategy and in the RFA group following to the CLOSE protocol. Patients were followed with 7d-Holter ECGs 3, 6, and 12 months after ablation. The primary endpoint was recurrence of any atrial arrhythmias following a blanking period of 3 months. RESULTS: A total of 202 patients were included (PFA: 32; Cryo: 82; RF: 88). Age, gender, CHA2DS2-VASc score, LVEF and LAVI did not differ among the groups (Table). Median procedure times were shortest with Cryo (76 [interquartile range 60-95] min) followed by PFA (94 [82-110] min) and RFA (157 [126-211] min, p < 0.01). Fluoroscopy dose was lowest with RFA (1.4 [0.6-2.5] Gycm2) followed by PFA (4.8 [3.5-7.9] Gycm2) and Cryo (5.3 [2.8-10.2] Gycm2, p < 0.01). Median follow-up time in patients without recurrence was 12 [10-12] months for the PFA group, 12 [12-13] months for the Cryo group and 13 [12-13] months for the RFA group. There was a trend towards fewer recurrences of atrial arrhythmias with PFA compared to Cryo and RFA (PFA 7%, Cryo: 25%, RFA: 20%, p = 0.13, Figure). CONCLUSION: Recurrences of atrial arrhythmias 12 months after PFA PVI for paroxAF may be lower compared to Cryo and RFA. Larger prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm this initial experience. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] Oxford University Press 2023-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10206883/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.157 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | 10.4.5 - Rhythm Control, Catheter Ablation Kueffer, T Madaffari, A Muehl, A Maurhofer, J Stefenova, A Seiler, J Thalmann, G Kozhuharov, N A Servatius, H Tanner, H Haeberlin, A Baldinger, S H Noti, F Roten, L Reichlin, T Pulsed-field- vs. cryo- vs. radiofrequency ablation: one-year recurrence rates after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation |
title | Pulsed-field- vs. cryo- vs. radiofrequency ablation: one-year recurrence rates after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation |
title_full | Pulsed-field- vs. cryo- vs. radiofrequency ablation: one-year recurrence rates after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation |
title_fullStr | Pulsed-field- vs. cryo- vs. radiofrequency ablation: one-year recurrence rates after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation |
title_full_unstemmed | Pulsed-field- vs. cryo- vs. radiofrequency ablation: one-year recurrence rates after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation |
title_short | Pulsed-field- vs. cryo- vs. radiofrequency ablation: one-year recurrence rates after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation |
title_sort | pulsed-field- vs. cryo- vs. radiofrequency ablation: one-year recurrence rates after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation |
topic | 10.4.5 - Rhythm Control, Catheter Ablation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10206883/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.157 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kueffert pulsedfieldvscryovsradiofrequencyablationoneyearrecurrenceratesafterpulmonaryveinisolationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation AT madaffaria pulsedfieldvscryovsradiofrequencyablationoneyearrecurrenceratesafterpulmonaryveinisolationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation AT muehla pulsedfieldvscryovsradiofrequencyablationoneyearrecurrenceratesafterpulmonaryveinisolationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation AT maurhoferj pulsedfieldvscryovsradiofrequencyablationoneyearrecurrenceratesafterpulmonaryveinisolationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation AT stefenovaa pulsedfieldvscryovsradiofrequencyablationoneyearrecurrenceratesafterpulmonaryveinisolationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation AT seilerj pulsedfieldvscryovsradiofrequencyablationoneyearrecurrenceratesafterpulmonaryveinisolationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation AT thalmanng pulsedfieldvscryovsradiofrequencyablationoneyearrecurrenceratesafterpulmonaryveinisolationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation AT kozhuharovna pulsedfieldvscryovsradiofrequencyablationoneyearrecurrenceratesafterpulmonaryveinisolationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation AT servatiush pulsedfieldvscryovsradiofrequencyablationoneyearrecurrenceratesafterpulmonaryveinisolationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation AT tannerh pulsedfieldvscryovsradiofrequencyablationoneyearrecurrenceratesafterpulmonaryveinisolationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation AT haeberlina pulsedfieldvscryovsradiofrequencyablationoneyearrecurrenceratesafterpulmonaryveinisolationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation AT baldingersh pulsedfieldvscryovsradiofrequencyablationoneyearrecurrenceratesafterpulmonaryveinisolationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation AT notif pulsedfieldvscryovsradiofrequencyablationoneyearrecurrenceratesafterpulmonaryveinisolationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation AT rotenl pulsedfieldvscryovsradiofrequencyablationoneyearrecurrenceratesafterpulmonaryveinisolationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation AT reichlint pulsedfieldvscryovsradiofrequencyablationoneyearrecurrenceratesafterpulmonaryveinisolationinpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation |