Cargando…

Objective assessment of nasal obstruction

There are many methods and types of equipment for measuring the nasal airway, but there is no consensus regarding the results of various clinical studies on nasal obstruction. In this review, we discuss the two major methods of objectively assessing the nasal airway: rhinomanometry and acoustic rhin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naito, Kensei, Horibe, Seiji, Tanabe, Yosuke, Kato, Hisayuki, Yoshioka, Satoshi, Tateya, Ichiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Fujita Medical Society 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10206903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37234397
http://dx.doi.org/10.20407/fmj.2021-029
_version_ 1785046328890359808
author Naito, Kensei
Horibe, Seiji
Tanabe, Yosuke
Kato, Hisayuki
Yoshioka, Satoshi
Tateya, Ichiro
author_facet Naito, Kensei
Horibe, Seiji
Tanabe, Yosuke
Kato, Hisayuki
Yoshioka, Satoshi
Tateya, Ichiro
author_sort Naito, Kensei
collection PubMed
description There are many methods and types of equipment for measuring the nasal airway, but there is no consensus regarding the results of various clinical studies on nasal obstruction. In this review, we discuss the two major methods of objectively assessing the nasal airway: rhinomanometry and acoustic rhinometry. The Japanese standard of rhinomanometry in Japanese adults and children was established by the Japanese Standardization Committee on Rhinomanometry in 2001 and 2018, respectively. However, the International Standardization Committee has proposed different standards because of differences in race, equipment, and social health insurance systems. The standardization of acoustic rhinometry in Japanese adults is making progress in several Japanese institutes, but the international standardization of acoustic rhinometry has not yet begun. Rhinomanometry is the physiological expression of nasal airway breathing, whereas acoustic rhinometry is the anatomic expression. In this review, we introduce the history and methods of the objective assessment of nasal patency and the physiological and pathological issues regarding nasal obstruction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10206903
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Fujita Medical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102069032023-05-25 Objective assessment of nasal obstruction Naito, Kensei Horibe, Seiji Tanabe, Yosuke Kato, Hisayuki Yoshioka, Satoshi Tateya, Ichiro Fujita Med J Review There are many methods and types of equipment for measuring the nasal airway, but there is no consensus regarding the results of various clinical studies on nasal obstruction. In this review, we discuss the two major methods of objectively assessing the nasal airway: rhinomanometry and acoustic rhinometry. The Japanese standard of rhinomanometry in Japanese adults and children was established by the Japanese Standardization Committee on Rhinomanometry in 2001 and 2018, respectively. However, the International Standardization Committee has proposed different standards because of differences in race, equipment, and social health insurance systems. The standardization of acoustic rhinometry in Japanese adults is making progress in several Japanese institutes, but the international standardization of acoustic rhinometry has not yet begun. Rhinomanometry is the physiological expression of nasal airway breathing, whereas acoustic rhinometry is the anatomic expression. In this review, we introduce the history and methods of the objective assessment of nasal patency and the physiological and pathological issues regarding nasal obstruction. Fujita Medical Society 2023-05 2022-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10206903/ /pubmed/37234397 http://dx.doi.org/10.20407/fmj.2021-029 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open access article distributed under the Terms of Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Review
Naito, Kensei
Horibe, Seiji
Tanabe, Yosuke
Kato, Hisayuki
Yoshioka, Satoshi
Tateya, Ichiro
Objective assessment of nasal obstruction
title Objective assessment of nasal obstruction
title_full Objective assessment of nasal obstruction
title_fullStr Objective assessment of nasal obstruction
title_full_unstemmed Objective assessment of nasal obstruction
title_short Objective assessment of nasal obstruction
title_sort objective assessment of nasal obstruction
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10206903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37234397
http://dx.doi.org/10.20407/fmj.2021-029
work_keys_str_mv AT naitokensei objectiveassessmentofnasalobstruction
AT horibeseiji objectiveassessmentofnasalobstruction
AT tanabeyosuke objectiveassessmentofnasalobstruction
AT katohisayuki objectiveassessmentofnasalobstruction
AT yoshiokasatoshi objectiveassessmentofnasalobstruction
AT tateyaichiro objectiveassessmentofnasalobstruction