Cargando…

Screw-in attempts and success rates in left bundle branch area pacing lead implantation

FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) represents a novel cardiac pacing approach that overcomes limitations of conventional right ventricular (septo-) apical pacing. Feasibility and early safety have been shown previously. However...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haeberlin, A, Seiler, J, Kozhuharov, N, Baldinger, S H, Servatius, H, Madaffari, A, Thalmann, G, Kueffer, T, Muehl, A, Tanner, H, Roten, L, Reichlin, T, Noti, F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10206938/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.385
_version_ 1785046337112244224
author Haeberlin, A
Seiler, J
Kozhuharov, N
Baldinger, S H
Servatius, H
Madaffari, A
Thalmann, G
Kueffer, T
Muehl, A
Tanner, H
Roten, L
Reichlin, T
Noti, F
author_facet Haeberlin, A
Seiler, J
Kozhuharov, N
Baldinger, S H
Servatius, H
Madaffari, A
Thalmann, G
Kueffer, T
Muehl, A
Tanner, H
Roten, L
Reichlin, T
Noti, F
author_sort Haeberlin, A
collection PubMed
description FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) represents a novel cardiac pacing approach that overcomes limitations of conventional right ventricular (septo-) apical pacing. Feasibility and early safety have been shown previously. However, technical limitations (non-dedicated leads, limited availability of suitable implantation sheats) still may preclude successful conduction system pacing (CSP) lead implantation. So-called drilling and entanglement effects can prevent lead implantation at a suitable site and multiple screw-in attempts may be required. However, lead implantation may ultimately still be unsuccessful. PURPOSE: To evaluate the number of total screw-in attempts until abandonment of LBBAP lead implantation during the procedure. METHODS: We prospectively assessed 170 consecutive LBBAP lead implantation attempts at our center from 09/2021 to 11/2022. All implanters had previous experience with His-bundle pacing lead implantation. Successful conduction system pacing was established according to standard criteria (R-wave peak time in V6, V1-V6-interpeak interval, programmed stimulation or visibility of a left bundle potential) and pacing thresholds <2V/0.5ms. The number of screw-in attempts and decision of LBBAP lead implantation abandonment was at the operator’s discretion. RESULTS: Patient baseline characteristics and procedural outcomes are shown in the table (percentages and median values with interquartile range in brackets). Overall CSP lead implantation success rate was 91%. Two patients (1%) experienced complications (one atrial lead dislodgement, one pneumothorax). Median number of screw-in attempts in all interventions was 2 (interquartile range [IQR] 1-4, maximum 12). If implantation was successful, a maximum of four attempts provided already 90% of the overall chance of success (figure). Additional lead implantation attempts rarely provided an additional benefit but prolonged overall implantation duration. CONCLUSION: To balance implantation success rates with procedure duration, the number of screw-in attempts during LBBAP lead implantation may be limited to 4-5 attempts. Bail-out strategies (implantation of a cardiac resynchronization pacemaker or a conventional pacemaker) may be considered if CSP lead implantation is unsuccessful after 4-5 attempts. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10206938
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102069382023-05-25 Screw-in attempts and success rates in left bundle branch area pacing lead implantation Haeberlin, A Seiler, J Kozhuharov, N Baldinger, S H Servatius, H Madaffari, A Thalmann, G Kueffer, T Muehl, A Tanner, H Roten, L Reichlin, T Noti, F Europace 14.1 - Antibradycardia Pacing FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) represents a novel cardiac pacing approach that overcomes limitations of conventional right ventricular (septo-) apical pacing. Feasibility and early safety have been shown previously. However, technical limitations (non-dedicated leads, limited availability of suitable implantation sheats) still may preclude successful conduction system pacing (CSP) lead implantation. So-called drilling and entanglement effects can prevent lead implantation at a suitable site and multiple screw-in attempts may be required. However, lead implantation may ultimately still be unsuccessful. PURPOSE: To evaluate the number of total screw-in attempts until abandonment of LBBAP lead implantation during the procedure. METHODS: We prospectively assessed 170 consecutive LBBAP lead implantation attempts at our center from 09/2021 to 11/2022. All implanters had previous experience with His-bundle pacing lead implantation. Successful conduction system pacing was established according to standard criteria (R-wave peak time in V6, V1-V6-interpeak interval, programmed stimulation or visibility of a left bundle potential) and pacing thresholds <2V/0.5ms. The number of screw-in attempts and decision of LBBAP lead implantation abandonment was at the operator’s discretion. RESULTS: Patient baseline characteristics and procedural outcomes are shown in the table (percentages and median values with interquartile range in brackets). Overall CSP lead implantation success rate was 91%. Two patients (1%) experienced complications (one atrial lead dislodgement, one pneumothorax). Median number of screw-in attempts in all interventions was 2 (interquartile range [IQR] 1-4, maximum 12). If implantation was successful, a maximum of four attempts provided already 90% of the overall chance of success (figure). Additional lead implantation attempts rarely provided an additional benefit but prolonged overall implantation duration. CONCLUSION: To balance implantation success rates with procedure duration, the number of screw-in attempts during LBBAP lead implantation may be limited to 4-5 attempts. Bail-out strategies (implantation of a cardiac resynchronization pacemaker or a conventional pacemaker) may be considered if CSP lead implantation is unsuccessful after 4-5 attempts. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] Oxford University Press 2023-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10206938/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.385 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle 14.1 - Antibradycardia Pacing
Haeberlin, A
Seiler, J
Kozhuharov, N
Baldinger, S H
Servatius, H
Madaffari, A
Thalmann, G
Kueffer, T
Muehl, A
Tanner, H
Roten, L
Reichlin, T
Noti, F
Screw-in attempts and success rates in left bundle branch area pacing lead implantation
title Screw-in attempts and success rates in left bundle branch area pacing lead implantation
title_full Screw-in attempts and success rates in left bundle branch area pacing lead implantation
title_fullStr Screw-in attempts and success rates in left bundle branch area pacing lead implantation
title_full_unstemmed Screw-in attempts and success rates in left bundle branch area pacing lead implantation
title_short Screw-in attempts and success rates in left bundle branch area pacing lead implantation
title_sort screw-in attempts and success rates in left bundle branch area pacing lead implantation
topic 14.1 - Antibradycardia Pacing
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10206938/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.385
work_keys_str_mv AT haeberlina screwinattemptsandsuccessratesinleftbundlebranchareapacingleadimplantation
AT seilerj screwinattemptsandsuccessratesinleftbundlebranchareapacingleadimplantation
AT kozhuharovn screwinattemptsandsuccessratesinleftbundlebranchareapacingleadimplantation
AT baldingersh screwinattemptsandsuccessratesinleftbundlebranchareapacingleadimplantation
AT servatiush screwinattemptsandsuccessratesinleftbundlebranchareapacingleadimplantation
AT madaffaria screwinattemptsandsuccessratesinleftbundlebranchareapacingleadimplantation
AT thalmanng screwinattemptsandsuccessratesinleftbundlebranchareapacingleadimplantation
AT kueffert screwinattemptsandsuccessratesinleftbundlebranchareapacingleadimplantation
AT muehla screwinattemptsandsuccessratesinleftbundlebranchareapacingleadimplantation
AT tannerh screwinattemptsandsuccessratesinleftbundlebranchareapacingleadimplantation
AT rotenl screwinattemptsandsuccessratesinleftbundlebranchareapacingleadimplantation
AT reichlint screwinattemptsandsuccessratesinleftbundlebranchareapacingleadimplantation
AT notif screwinattemptsandsuccessratesinleftbundlebranchareapacingleadimplantation