Pulsed-field ablation based pulmonary vein isolation: reconnection pattern and comparison to cryoballoon ablation

FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) integrated into a pentaspline catheter is a novel single shot device to perform pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). While initial data demonstrated high safety and efficacy, long-term PVI durability and reconnection patterns are unknown. Here, we analyzed findings from repeat ablation procedures after index PFA compared to cryoballoon ablation (CBA) based PVI. METHODS: We prospectively included consecutive patients with index PVI applying PFA (n=161) or CBA (n=302) who underwent repeat ablation due to symptomatic recurrence of AF or atrial tachycardia (AT) after a blanking period of 3 months. All repeat procedures were performed with a 3D mapping system and RF energy. RESULTS: We identified a total of 14 patients after previous PFA and 23 patients after previous CBA. PV reconnection was detected in 9/14 (64%) patients after PFA and in 16/23 (70%) after CBA (p=1.000). A total of 24/55 (44%) vs. 34/92 (37%) initially isolated PVs demonstrated electrical reconduction (p=0.487) after PFA and CB ablation. In both groups the right inferior PV was reconnected most frequently (9/24 (38%) patients after PFA and 10/34 (29%; p=0.578) patients after CBA). Distribution of conduction gaps is shown in figure 1. All PVs were successfully reisolated. Repeat procedures after index PFA and CBA showed similar duration (115±32 min vs. 114±49 min; p=0.785), fluoroscopy time (13±4 min vs. 14±8 min; p=0.558) and number of RF applications (38±23 vs. 36±34, p=0.738). CONCLUSION: During repeat AF/AT ablation after previous PFA- or CBA-based PVI a comparable incidence of PV reconduction gaps was found. Repeat procedure times and fluoroscopy exposure were similar. Randomized controlled trials and longer follow-up are necessary to draw further conclusions. [Figure: see text]