Cargando…

Comparison of 1st and 2nd generation leadless pacemaker in sinus rhythm patients with chronic ventricular pacing for complete atrioventricular block

FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: Leadless pacemakers (LPMs) represent a seductive alternative to conventional pacing. First generation of Micra transcatheter pacing system was able to provide single-chamber VVI(R) pacing mode only, with a potential risk of pacemak...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clementy, N, Lenormand, T, Bodin, A, Bisson, A, Babuty, D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10206995/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.371
_version_ 1785046350698643456
author Clementy, N
Lenormand, T
Bodin, A
Bisson, A
Babuty, D
author_facet Clementy, N
Lenormand, T
Bodin, A
Bisson, A
Babuty, D
author_sort Clementy, N
collection PubMed
description FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: Leadless pacemakers (LPMs) represent a seductive alternative to conventional pacing. First generation of Micra transcatheter pacing system was able to provide single-chamber VVI(R) pacing mode only, with a potential risk of pacemaker syndrome in sinus rhythm patients. A 2nd generation system (AV) now provides atrioventricular synchrony through atrial mechanical sensing capability (VDD mode). PURPOSE: We sought to compare VR and AV systems in patients with sinus rhythm and chronic ventricular pacing for complete atrioventricular block. METHODS: All consecutive patients implanted with an LPM in our department for complete atrioventricular block were retrospectively screened. Patients with atrial fibrillation, sinus dysfunction, or ventricular pacing burden <20% at 1-month post-implantation were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 80 patients – 35 VR (2015-2020) and 45 AV (2020-2021) – were included. VR and AV patients had similar baseline characteristics, except for that VR patients being older (82±8 versus 77±9 years, p=0.01). Mean ventricular pacing burden was 75% in the VR and 79% in the AV group (p=0.63). In AV patients, median atrioventricular synchronous beats rate was 77%, 67% having a >66% rate. An E/A ratio <1 as measured on echocardiography was the only independent predictor of accurate atrial mechanical tracking (adjusted OR=13, p=0.006). One-year survival rate was 86% in the VR group and 95% in the AV group (adjusted p=0.21). Two patients in the VR and 0 in the AV group eventually developed pacemaker syndrome in the 1st year post-implantation (p=0.07). CONCLUSION: In sinus rhythm patients with chronic ventricular pacing for complete atrioventricular block implanted with an LPM, atrial mechanical sensing algorithm allowed significant atrioventricular synchrony in most patients, and was associated with no occurrence of – otherwise rare – pacemaker syndrome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10206995
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102069952023-05-25 Comparison of 1st and 2nd generation leadless pacemaker in sinus rhythm patients with chronic ventricular pacing for complete atrioventricular block Clementy, N Lenormand, T Bodin, A Bisson, A Babuty, D Europace 14.1 - Antibradycardia Pacing FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: Leadless pacemakers (LPMs) represent a seductive alternative to conventional pacing. First generation of Micra transcatheter pacing system was able to provide single-chamber VVI(R) pacing mode only, with a potential risk of pacemaker syndrome in sinus rhythm patients. A 2nd generation system (AV) now provides atrioventricular synchrony through atrial mechanical sensing capability (VDD mode). PURPOSE: We sought to compare VR and AV systems in patients with sinus rhythm and chronic ventricular pacing for complete atrioventricular block. METHODS: All consecutive patients implanted with an LPM in our department for complete atrioventricular block were retrospectively screened. Patients with atrial fibrillation, sinus dysfunction, or ventricular pacing burden <20% at 1-month post-implantation were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 80 patients – 35 VR (2015-2020) and 45 AV (2020-2021) – were included. VR and AV patients had similar baseline characteristics, except for that VR patients being older (82±8 versus 77±9 years, p=0.01). Mean ventricular pacing burden was 75% in the VR and 79% in the AV group (p=0.63). In AV patients, median atrioventricular synchronous beats rate was 77%, 67% having a >66% rate. An E/A ratio <1 as measured on echocardiography was the only independent predictor of accurate atrial mechanical tracking (adjusted OR=13, p=0.006). One-year survival rate was 86% in the VR group and 95% in the AV group (adjusted p=0.21). Two patients in the VR and 0 in the AV group eventually developed pacemaker syndrome in the 1st year post-implantation (p=0.07). CONCLUSION: In sinus rhythm patients with chronic ventricular pacing for complete atrioventricular block implanted with an LPM, atrial mechanical sensing algorithm allowed significant atrioventricular synchrony in most patients, and was associated with no occurrence of – otherwise rare – pacemaker syndrome. Oxford University Press 2023-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10206995/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.371 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle 14.1 - Antibradycardia Pacing
Clementy, N
Lenormand, T
Bodin, A
Bisson, A
Babuty, D
Comparison of 1st and 2nd generation leadless pacemaker in sinus rhythm patients with chronic ventricular pacing for complete atrioventricular block
title Comparison of 1st and 2nd generation leadless pacemaker in sinus rhythm patients with chronic ventricular pacing for complete atrioventricular block
title_full Comparison of 1st and 2nd generation leadless pacemaker in sinus rhythm patients with chronic ventricular pacing for complete atrioventricular block
title_fullStr Comparison of 1st and 2nd generation leadless pacemaker in sinus rhythm patients with chronic ventricular pacing for complete atrioventricular block
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of 1st and 2nd generation leadless pacemaker in sinus rhythm patients with chronic ventricular pacing for complete atrioventricular block
title_short Comparison of 1st and 2nd generation leadless pacemaker in sinus rhythm patients with chronic ventricular pacing for complete atrioventricular block
title_sort comparison of 1st and 2nd generation leadless pacemaker in sinus rhythm patients with chronic ventricular pacing for complete atrioventricular block
topic 14.1 - Antibradycardia Pacing
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10206995/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.371
work_keys_str_mv AT clementyn comparisonof1stand2ndgenerationleadlesspacemakerinsinusrhythmpatientswithchronicventricularpacingforcompleteatrioventricularblock
AT lenormandt comparisonof1stand2ndgenerationleadlesspacemakerinsinusrhythmpatientswithchronicventricularpacingforcompleteatrioventricularblock
AT bodina comparisonof1stand2ndgenerationleadlesspacemakerinsinusrhythmpatientswithchronicventricularpacingforcompleteatrioventricularblock
AT bissona comparisonof1stand2ndgenerationleadlesspacemakerinsinusrhythmpatientswithchronicventricularpacingforcompleteatrioventricularblock
AT babutyd comparisonof1stand2ndgenerationleadlesspacemakerinsinusrhythmpatientswithchronicventricularpacingforcompleteatrioventricularblock