Cargando…

Expert opinion on optimal programming strategy to increase AV synchrony in different profiles of patients implanted with leadless ventricular pacemaker

FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Medtronic BACKGROUND: Recently published real-world data showed that Micra leadless pacemaker implanted in the right ventricle can provide atrioventricular (AV) synchronous pacing by accelerometer-based mecha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garweg, C, Breitenstein, A, Brock Johansen, J, Clementy, N, De Asmundis, C, Iacopino, S, Sharman, D, Theis, C, Vinolas, X, Winter, S, Reichlin, T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10207035/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.363
_version_ 1785046359839080448
author Garweg, C
Breitenstein, A
Brock Johansen, J
Clementy, N
De Asmundis, C
Iacopino, S
Sharman, D
Theis, C
Vinolas, X
Winter, S
Reichlin, T
author_facet Garweg, C
Breitenstein, A
Brock Johansen, J
Clementy, N
De Asmundis, C
Iacopino, S
Sharman, D
Theis, C
Vinolas, X
Winter, S
Reichlin, T
author_sort Garweg, C
collection PubMed
description FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Medtronic BACKGROUND: Recently published real-world data showed that Micra leadless pacemaker implanted in the right ventricle can provide atrioventricular (AV) synchronous pacing by accelerometer-based mechanically sensing atrial contractions in patients with a high pacing burden (1). Routinely performed programming optimization of several novel parameters (particularly concerning the A3 and A4 windows) is key to improving AV synchrony (AVS). PURPOSE: This project aims to define optimal programming recommendations for defined patient profiles. METHODS: An Experts Panel (ExpP), made up of 11 electrophysiologists from high-volume centers (37±17 Micra AV procedures/year) contributing to the Medtronic Micra AV prospective Post Approval Registry (PAR), was assembled to share their opinion about the optimal programming strategy to improve AVS in patients with: 1) slow sinus rhythm and high degree AV block, 2) fast sinus rhythm and high degree AV block, 3) intermittent AV-block. The following steps were followed: - Data from Micra AV PAR database were retrospectively analyzed and shared with ExpP. - An online survey was completed by the ExpP to evaluate their current programming strategy, based on PAR data. - After a face-to-face meeting to discuss the survey results, a second survey round was completed to reach consensus on the optimal programming strategy. Agreement was considered reached when >75% of responders did not disagree. RESULTS: Specific detailed programming recommendations have been developed for the three different patient profiles (Figure 1). Most importantly, it was agreed that Auto A3 Threshold and tracking check should be turned off in all patients, AV conduction mode switch should be turned off in all patients with high degree AVB, and the lower rate should be programmed in general to 50bpm. In addition, the following general recommendations were agreed on by the ExpP: - A pre-implant echocardiogram with a particular focus on diastolic function should always be performed to identify patients who may benefit from Micra AV implantation. - Micra AV auto-setup should always be performed at implant. - Before discharge, basic adjustments based on results of the Manual Atrial. Mechanical (MAM) test, patient activity level, and age should be performed. - At each follow-up visit, fine-tuning programming based on patient feedback, device data (in particular %AM-VP) and performance of a MAM Test. CONCLUSIONS: An ExpP of Micra AV implanters agreed on general recommendations for Micra AV patients’ management before implant and during follow-up. Specific programming recommendations for patients with slow sinus rhythm and high degree AV block, fast sinus rhythm and high degree AV block, and intermittent AV block have been developed. A validation phase will show if the application of these indications in clinical practice may improve AVS. [Figure: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10207035
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102070352023-05-25 Expert opinion on optimal programming strategy to increase AV synchrony in different profiles of patients implanted with leadless ventricular pacemaker Garweg, C Breitenstein, A Brock Johansen, J Clementy, N De Asmundis, C Iacopino, S Sharman, D Theis, C Vinolas, X Winter, S Reichlin, T Europace 14.1 - Antibradycardia Pacing FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Medtronic BACKGROUND: Recently published real-world data showed that Micra leadless pacemaker implanted in the right ventricle can provide atrioventricular (AV) synchronous pacing by accelerometer-based mechanically sensing atrial contractions in patients with a high pacing burden (1). Routinely performed programming optimization of several novel parameters (particularly concerning the A3 and A4 windows) is key to improving AV synchrony (AVS). PURPOSE: This project aims to define optimal programming recommendations for defined patient profiles. METHODS: An Experts Panel (ExpP), made up of 11 electrophysiologists from high-volume centers (37±17 Micra AV procedures/year) contributing to the Medtronic Micra AV prospective Post Approval Registry (PAR), was assembled to share their opinion about the optimal programming strategy to improve AVS in patients with: 1) slow sinus rhythm and high degree AV block, 2) fast sinus rhythm and high degree AV block, 3) intermittent AV-block. The following steps were followed: - Data from Micra AV PAR database were retrospectively analyzed and shared with ExpP. - An online survey was completed by the ExpP to evaluate their current programming strategy, based on PAR data. - After a face-to-face meeting to discuss the survey results, a second survey round was completed to reach consensus on the optimal programming strategy. Agreement was considered reached when >75% of responders did not disagree. RESULTS: Specific detailed programming recommendations have been developed for the three different patient profiles (Figure 1). Most importantly, it was agreed that Auto A3 Threshold and tracking check should be turned off in all patients, AV conduction mode switch should be turned off in all patients with high degree AVB, and the lower rate should be programmed in general to 50bpm. In addition, the following general recommendations were agreed on by the ExpP: - A pre-implant echocardiogram with a particular focus on diastolic function should always be performed to identify patients who may benefit from Micra AV implantation. - Micra AV auto-setup should always be performed at implant. - Before discharge, basic adjustments based on results of the Manual Atrial. Mechanical (MAM) test, patient activity level, and age should be performed. - At each follow-up visit, fine-tuning programming based on patient feedback, device data (in particular %AM-VP) and performance of a MAM Test. CONCLUSIONS: An ExpP of Micra AV implanters agreed on general recommendations for Micra AV patients’ management before implant and during follow-up. Specific programming recommendations for patients with slow sinus rhythm and high degree AV block, fast sinus rhythm and high degree AV block, and intermittent AV block have been developed. A validation phase will show if the application of these indications in clinical practice may improve AVS. [Figure: see text] Oxford University Press 2023-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10207035/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.363 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle 14.1 - Antibradycardia Pacing
Garweg, C
Breitenstein, A
Brock Johansen, J
Clementy, N
De Asmundis, C
Iacopino, S
Sharman, D
Theis, C
Vinolas, X
Winter, S
Reichlin, T
Expert opinion on optimal programming strategy to increase AV synchrony in different profiles of patients implanted with leadless ventricular pacemaker
title Expert opinion on optimal programming strategy to increase AV synchrony in different profiles of patients implanted with leadless ventricular pacemaker
title_full Expert opinion on optimal programming strategy to increase AV synchrony in different profiles of patients implanted with leadless ventricular pacemaker
title_fullStr Expert opinion on optimal programming strategy to increase AV synchrony in different profiles of patients implanted with leadless ventricular pacemaker
title_full_unstemmed Expert opinion on optimal programming strategy to increase AV synchrony in different profiles of patients implanted with leadless ventricular pacemaker
title_short Expert opinion on optimal programming strategy to increase AV synchrony in different profiles of patients implanted with leadless ventricular pacemaker
title_sort expert opinion on optimal programming strategy to increase av synchrony in different profiles of patients implanted with leadless ventricular pacemaker
topic 14.1 - Antibradycardia Pacing
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10207035/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.363
work_keys_str_mv AT garwegc expertopiniononoptimalprogrammingstrategytoincreaseavsynchronyindifferentprofilesofpatientsimplantedwithleadlessventricularpacemaker
AT breitensteina expertopiniononoptimalprogrammingstrategytoincreaseavsynchronyindifferentprofilesofpatientsimplantedwithleadlessventricularpacemaker
AT brockjohansenj expertopiniononoptimalprogrammingstrategytoincreaseavsynchronyindifferentprofilesofpatientsimplantedwithleadlessventricularpacemaker
AT clementyn expertopiniononoptimalprogrammingstrategytoincreaseavsynchronyindifferentprofilesofpatientsimplantedwithleadlessventricularpacemaker
AT deasmundisc expertopiniononoptimalprogrammingstrategytoincreaseavsynchronyindifferentprofilesofpatientsimplantedwithleadlessventricularpacemaker
AT iacopinos expertopiniononoptimalprogrammingstrategytoincreaseavsynchronyindifferentprofilesofpatientsimplantedwithleadlessventricularpacemaker
AT sharmand expertopiniononoptimalprogrammingstrategytoincreaseavsynchronyindifferentprofilesofpatientsimplantedwithleadlessventricularpacemaker
AT theisc expertopiniononoptimalprogrammingstrategytoincreaseavsynchronyindifferentprofilesofpatientsimplantedwithleadlessventricularpacemaker
AT vinolasx expertopiniononoptimalprogrammingstrategytoincreaseavsynchronyindifferentprofilesofpatientsimplantedwithleadlessventricularpacemaker
AT winters expertopiniononoptimalprogrammingstrategytoincreaseavsynchronyindifferentprofilesofpatientsimplantedwithleadlessventricularpacemaker
AT reichlint expertopiniononoptimalprogrammingstrategytoincreaseavsynchronyindifferentprofilesofpatientsimplantedwithleadlessventricularpacemaker