High-Order Quantum-Mechanical Analysis of Hydrogen Bonding in Hachimoji and Natural DNA Base Pairs

[Image: see text] High-order quantum chemistry is applied to hydrogen-bonded natural DNA nucleobase pairs [adenine:thymine (A:T) and guanine:cytosine (G:C)] and non-natural Hachimoji nucleobase pairs [isoguanine:1-methylcytosine (B:S) and 2-aminoimidazo[1,2a][1,3,5]triazin-4(1H)-one:6-amino-5-nitropyridin-2-one (P:Z)] to see how the intermolecular interaction energies and their energetic components (electrostatics, exchange-repulsion, induction/polarization, and London dispersion interactions) vary among the base pairs. We examined the Hoogsteen (HG) geometries in addition to the traditional Watson–Crick (WC) geometries. Coupled-cluster theory through perturbative triples [CCSD(T)] extrapolated to the complete basis set (CBS) limit and high-order symmetry-adapted perturbation theory (SAPT) at the SAPT2+(3)(CCD)δMP2/aug-cc-pVTZ level are used to estimate highly accurate noncovalent interaction energies. Electrostatic interactions are the most attractive component of the interaction energies, but the sum of induction/polarization and London dispersion is nearly as large, for all base pairs and geometries considered. Interestingly, the non-natural Hachimoji base pairs interact more strongly than the corresponding natural base pairs, by −21.8 (B:S) and −0.3 (P:Z) kcal mol(–1) in the WC geometries, according to CCSD(T)/CBS. This is consistent with the H-bond distances being generally shorter in the non-natural base pairs. The natural base pairs are energetically more stabilized in their Hoogsteen geometries than in their WC geometries. The Hoogsteen geometry makes the A:T base pair slightly more stable, by −0.8 kcal mol(–1), and it greatly stabilizes the G:C(+) base pair, by −15.3 kcal mol(–1). The G:C(+) stabilization is mainly due to the fact that C has typically added a proton when found in Hoogsteen geometries. By contrast, Hoogsteen geometries are substantially less favorable than WC geometries for non-natural Hachimoji base pairs, by 17.3 (B:S) and 13.8 (P:Z) kcal mol(–1).