Cargando…

Age and genetics are associated with ventricular fibrillation but not with monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in Brugada syndrome

FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION: Brugada syndrome (BrS) is associated with ventricular arrhythmias (VA) in macroscopically normal hearts. VA in BrS can be classified as ventricular fibrillation (VF) and monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (MVT). Altho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pannone, L, Osei, R, Gauthey, A, Sorgente, A, Della Rocca, D G, Overeinder, I, Bala, G, Almorad, A, Stroker, E, Sieira, J, La Meir, M, Brugada, P, Chierchia, G B, Van Dooren, S, De Asmundis, C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10207278/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.268
_version_ 1785046417533829120
author Pannone, L
Osei, R
Gauthey, A
Sorgente, A
Della Rocca, D G
Overeinder, I
Bala, G
Almorad, A
Stroker, E
Sieira, J
La Meir, M
Brugada, P
Chierchia, G B
Van Dooren, S
De Asmundis, C
author_facet Pannone, L
Osei, R
Gauthey, A
Sorgente, A
Della Rocca, D G
Overeinder, I
Bala, G
Almorad, A
Stroker, E
Sieira, J
La Meir, M
Brugada, P
Chierchia, G B
Van Dooren, S
De Asmundis, C
author_sort Pannone, L
collection PubMed
description FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION: Brugada syndrome (BrS) is associated with ventricular arrhythmias (VA) in macroscopically normal hearts. VA in BrS can be classified as ventricular fibrillation (VF) and monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (MVT). Although BrS has been initially described in association with VF, MVT is not rare, as it occurs in ≈30% of BrS patients. PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to correlate VF or MVT with the genetic background and other clinical variables. METHODS: All BrS patients, were prospectively enrolled in a monocentric registry between 1992 and 2022. Inclusion criteria for the study were: 1) BrS diagnosis; 2) Genetic analysis performed for SCN5A; 3) Classification of variants following ACMG guidelines. Patients with a pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variant in SCN5A were defined as (P+). Patients without a P/LP variant were defined as (P-). Primary endpoint was VA occurrence, defined as: documented arrhythmic SCD, documented arrhythmic aborted SCD, VF, sustained MVT or appropriate ICD intervention. All VA events were adjudicated as VF or MVT. RESULTS: A total of 500 BrS patients were analyzed. A P/LP variant in SCN5A was found in 104 patients (20.8%). After a mean follow-up of 110.9 months, 48 patients (9.6%) experienced a VA, adjudicated as MVT in 18 patients (37.5%) and VF in 30 patients (62.5%). At survival analysis, P- patients had higher VF free survival, compared with P+ patients (96.5% vs 84.6%, Log-Rank p<0.001) with no difference in MVT free survival (Log-Rank p=0.61), Figure 1. BrS patients > 30 years at diagnosis had higher VF free survival, compared with patients ≤ 30 years at diagnosis (95.5% vs 90.3%, Log-Rank p=0.041), with no difference in MVT free survival (Log-Rank p=0.9), Figure 2. Patients > 50 years at index event had higher VF free survival, compared with patients ≤ 50 years at index event (Log-Rank p=0.002), with no significant difference in MVT free survival (Log-Rank p=0.81). At Cox multivariate analysis independent predictors of VF occurrence were as follows: Age at index event ≤ 50 years (HR=2.57, CI 95% 1.01-6.6, p=0.04), P/LP variant in SCN5A (HR= 2.35, CI 95% 1.12-4.92, p=0.02), SND (HR= 2.67, CI 95% 1.01-7.04, p=0.044), history of syncope (HR= 2.14, CI 95% 1.02-4.51, p=0.047) and history of aborted SCD (HR= 18.66, CI 95% 8.87-39.27, p<0.001). Independent predictors of MVT occurrence were the following: history of syncope (HR= 2.71, CI 95% 1.26-5.80, p=0.01), history of aborted SCD (HR= 4.82, CI 95% 2.14-10.85, p<0.001), VA inducibility at EPS (HR= 3.71, CI 95% 1.66-8.31, p=0.001). CONCLUSION: In a large BrS cohort undergoing genetic analysis MVT occurred in 37.5% of patients and VF in 62.5% of patients. P/LP SCN5A carriers and younger BrS population had a higher incidence of VF with no difference in MVT incidence. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10207278
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102072782023-05-25 Age and genetics are associated with ventricular fibrillation but not with monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in Brugada syndrome Pannone, L Osei, R Gauthey, A Sorgente, A Della Rocca, D G Overeinder, I Bala, G Almorad, A Stroker, E Sieira, J La Meir, M Brugada, P Chierchia, G B Van Dooren, S De Asmundis, C Europace 13.2 - Epidemiology, Prognosis, Outcome FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION: Brugada syndrome (BrS) is associated with ventricular arrhythmias (VA) in macroscopically normal hearts. VA in BrS can be classified as ventricular fibrillation (VF) and monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (MVT). Although BrS has been initially described in association with VF, MVT is not rare, as it occurs in ≈30% of BrS patients. PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to correlate VF or MVT with the genetic background and other clinical variables. METHODS: All BrS patients, were prospectively enrolled in a monocentric registry between 1992 and 2022. Inclusion criteria for the study were: 1) BrS diagnosis; 2) Genetic analysis performed for SCN5A; 3) Classification of variants following ACMG guidelines. Patients with a pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variant in SCN5A were defined as (P+). Patients without a P/LP variant were defined as (P-). Primary endpoint was VA occurrence, defined as: documented arrhythmic SCD, documented arrhythmic aborted SCD, VF, sustained MVT or appropriate ICD intervention. All VA events were adjudicated as VF or MVT. RESULTS: A total of 500 BrS patients were analyzed. A P/LP variant in SCN5A was found in 104 patients (20.8%). After a mean follow-up of 110.9 months, 48 patients (9.6%) experienced a VA, adjudicated as MVT in 18 patients (37.5%) and VF in 30 patients (62.5%). At survival analysis, P- patients had higher VF free survival, compared with P+ patients (96.5% vs 84.6%, Log-Rank p<0.001) with no difference in MVT free survival (Log-Rank p=0.61), Figure 1. BrS patients > 30 years at diagnosis had higher VF free survival, compared with patients ≤ 30 years at diagnosis (95.5% vs 90.3%, Log-Rank p=0.041), with no difference in MVT free survival (Log-Rank p=0.9), Figure 2. Patients > 50 years at index event had higher VF free survival, compared with patients ≤ 50 years at index event (Log-Rank p=0.002), with no significant difference in MVT free survival (Log-Rank p=0.81). At Cox multivariate analysis independent predictors of VF occurrence were as follows: Age at index event ≤ 50 years (HR=2.57, CI 95% 1.01-6.6, p=0.04), P/LP variant in SCN5A (HR= 2.35, CI 95% 1.12-4.92, p=0.02), SND (HR= 2.67, CI 95% 1.01-7.04, p=0.044), history of syncope (HR= 2.14, CI 95% 1.02-4.51, p=0.047) and history of aborted SCD (HR= 18.66, CI 95% 8.87-39.27, p<0.001). Independent predictors of MVT occurrence were the following: history of syncope (HR= 2.71, CI 95% 1.26-5.80, p=0.01), history of aborted SCD (HR= 4.82, CI 95% 2.14-10.85, p<0.001), VA inducibility at EPS (HR= 3.71, CI 95% 1.66-8.31, p=0.001). CONCLUSION: In a large BrS cohort undergoing genetic analysis MVT occurred in 37.5% of patients and VF in 62.5% of patients. P/LP SCN5A carriers and younger BrS population had a higher incidence of VF with no difference in MVT incidence. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] Oxford University Press 2023-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10207278/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.268 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle 13.2 - Epidemiology, Prognosis, Outcome
Pannone, L
Osei, R
Gauthey, A
Sorgente, A
Della Rocca, D G
Overeinder, I
Bala, G
Almorad, A
Stroker, E
Sieira, J
La Meir, M
Brugada, P
Chierchia, G B
Van Dooren, S
De Asmundis, C
Age and genetics are associated with ventricular fibrillation but not with monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in Brugada syndrome
title Age and genetics are associated with ventricular fibrillation but not with monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in Brugada syndrome
title_full Age and genetics are associated with ventricular fibrillation but not with monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in Brugada syndrome
title_fullStr Age and genetics are associated with ventricular fibrillation but not with monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in Brugada syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Age and genetics are associated with ventricular fibrillation but not with monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in Brugada syndrome
title_short Age and genetics are associated with ventricular fibrillation but not with monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in Brugada syndrome
title_sort age and genetics are associated with ventricular fibrillation but not with monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in brugada syndrome
topic 13.2 - Epidemiology, Prognosis, Outcome
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10207278/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.268
work_keys_str_mv AT pannonel ageandgeneticsareassociatedwithventricularfibrillationbutnotwithmonomorphicventriculartachycardiainbrugadasyndrome
AT oseir ageandgeneticsareassociatedwithventricularfibrillationbutnotwithmonomorphicventriculartachycardiainbrugadasyndrome
AT gautheya ageandgeneticsareassociatedwithventricularfibrillationbutnotwithmonomorphicventriculartachycardiainbrugadasyndrome
AT sorgentea ageandgeneticsareassociatedwithventricularfibrillationbutnotwithmonomorphicventriculartachycardiainbrugadasyndrome
AT dellaroccadg ageandgeneticsareassociatedwithventricularfibrillationbutnotwithmonomorphicventriculartachycardiainbrugadasyndrome
AT overeinderi ageandgeneticsareassociatedwithventricularfibrillationbutnotwithmonomorphicventriculartachycardiainbrugadasyndrome
AT balag ageandgeneticsareassociatedwithventricularfibrillationbutnotwithmonomorphicventriculartachycardiainbrugadasyndrome
AT almorada ageandgeneticsareassociatedwithventricularfibrillationbutnotwithmonomorphicventriculartachycardiainbrugadasyndrome
AT strokere ageandgeneticsareassociatedwithventricularfibrillationbutnotwithmonomorphicventriculartachycardiainbrugadasyndrome
AT sieiraj ageandgeneticsareassociatedwithventricularfibrillationbutnotwithmonomorphicventriculartachycardiainbrugadasyndrome
AT lameirm ageandgeneticsareassociatedwithventricularfibrillationbutnotwithmonomorphicventriculartachycardiainbrugadasyndrome
AT brugadap ageandgeneticsareassociatedwithventricularfibrillationbutnotwithmonomorphicventriculartachycardiainbrugadasyndrome
AT chierchiagb ageandgeneticsareassociatedwithventricularfibrillationbutnotwithmonomorphicventriculartachycardiainbrugadasyndrome
AT vandoorens ageandgeneticsareassociatedwithventricularfibrillationbutnotwithmonomorphicventriculartachycardiainbrugadasyndrome
AT deasmundisc ageandgeneticsareassociatedwithventricularfibrillationbutnotwithmonomorphicventriculartachycardiainbrugadasyndrome