Cargando…

Pulsed-field ablation in patients with permanent pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator: Is it safe?

FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. AIMS: Pulse field ablation (PFA) is a novel catheter ablation technology with safety benefits due to its tissue selectivity. The risk of physical damage or electromagnetic interference (EMI) of PFA with cardiac implantable electronic devices (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lennerz, C, Oconnor, M, Schaarschmidt, C, Reents, T, Bourier, F, Lengauer, S, Bahlke, F, Krafft, H, Knoll, K, Englert, F, Telishevska, M, Hessling, G, Kolb, C, Deisenhofer, I, Kottmaier, M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10207290/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.496
_version_ 1785046419670827008
author Lennerz, C
Oconnor, M
Schaarschmidt, C
Reents, T
Bourier, F
Lengauer, S
Bahlke, F
Krafft, H
Knoll, K
Englert, F
Telishevska, M
Hessling, G
Kolb, C
Deisenhofer, I
Kottmaier, M
author_facet Lennerz, C
Oconnor, M
Schaarschmidt, C
Reents, T
Bourier, F
Lengauer, S
Bahlke, F
Krafft, H
Knoll, K
Englert, F
Telishevska, M
Hessling, G
Kolb, C
Deisenhofer, I
Kottmaier, M
author_sort Lennerz, C
collection PubMed
description FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. AIMS: Pulse field ablation (PFA) is a novel catheter ablation technology with safety benefits due to its tissue selectivity. The risk of physical damage or electromagnetic interference (EMI) of PFA with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is unknown. The aim of our study was to assess the risk of PFA for CIEDs. METHODS: PFA lesions (45 per CIED) were applied to CIEDs (<5cm from the lead tip and <15cm from the generator). All devices were checked before and after PFA application for sensing and pacing parameters as well as integrity of shock circuits in ICDs using a heart simulator. Devices were interrogated for any spontaneous reprogramming, mode switching or other EMI effects. RESULTS: In total, 44 CIEDs were tested (16 pacemaker, 21 ICDs, 7 CRT-P/D) with 1,980 PFA applications. There was no change in device settings, functionality, electrical parameters and there was no visible damage to the CIEDs or leads. The risk on a device-based analysis is 0/44 (95% CI 0%-8%) and on a PFA pulse-based analysis is 0/1,980 (95% CI 0%-0.2%). Clinically relevant EMI appeared with oversensing and pacing inhibition, but not tachycardia detection. CONCLUSIONS: Bipolar PFA appears safe and does not result in damage to CIEDs or leads. Clinically relevant EMI does occur, but appropriate peri-procedural programming may mitigate this. In-vivo studies are needed to confirm our findings. [Figure: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10207290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102072902023-05-25 Pulsed-field ablation in patients with permanent pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator: Is it safe? Lennerz, C Oconnor, M Schaarschmidt, C Reents, T Bourier, F Lengauer, S Bahlke, F Krafft, H Knoll, K Englert, F Telishevska, M Hessling, G Kolb, C Deisenhofer, I Kottmaier, M Europace 14.5 - Device Complications and Lead Extraction FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. AIMS: Pulse field ablation (PFA) is a novel catheter ablation technology with safety benefits due to its tissue selectivity. The risk of physical damage or electromagnetic interference (EMI) of PFA with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is unknown. The aim of our study was to assess the risk of PFA for CIEDs. METHODS: PFA lesions (45 per CIED) were applied to CIEDs (<5cm from the lead tip and <15cm from the generator). All devices were checked before and after PFA application for sensing and pacing parameters as well as integrity of shock circuits in ICDs using a heart simulator. Devices were interrogated for any spontaneous reprogramming, mode switching or other EMI effects. RESULTS: In total, 44 CIEDs were tested (16 pacemaker, 21 ICDs, 7 CRT-P/D) with 1,980 PFA applications. There was no change in device settings, functionality, electrical parameters and there was no visible damage to the CIEDs or leads. The risk on a device-based analysis is 0/44 (95% CI 0%-8%) and on a PFA pulse-based analysis is 0/1,980 (95% CI 0%-0.2%). Clinically relevant EMI appeared with oversensing and pacing inhibition, but not tachycardia detection. CONCLUSIONS: Bipolar PFA appears safe and does not result in damage to CIEDs or leads. Clinically relevant EMI does occur, but appropriate peri-procedural programming may mitigate this. In-vivo studies are needed to confirm our findings. [Figure: see text] Oxford University Press 2023-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10207290/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.496 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle 14.5 - Device Complications and Lead Extraction
Lennerz, C
Oconnor, M
Schaarschmidt, C
Reents, T
Bourier, F
Lengauer, S
Bahlke, F
Krafft, H
Knoll, K
Englert, F
Telishevska, M
Hessling, G
Kolb, C
Deisenhofer, I
Kottmaier, M
Pulsed-field ablation in patients with permanent pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator: Is it safe?
title Pulsed-field ablation in patients with permanent pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator: Is it safe?
title_full Pulsed-field ablation in patients with permanent pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator: Is it safe?
title_fullStr Pulsed-field ablation in patients with permanent pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator: Is it safe?
title_full_unstemmed Pulsed-field ablation in patients with permanent pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator: Is it safe?
title_short Pulsed-field ablation in patients with permanent pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator: Is it safe?
title_sort pulsed-field ablation in patients with permanent pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator: is it safe?
topic 14.5 - Device Complications and Lead Extraction
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10207290/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.496
work_keys_str_mv AT lennerzc pulsedfieldablationinpatientswithpermanentpacemakerorimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorisitsafe
AT oconnorm pulsedfieldablationinpatientswithpermanentpacemakerorimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorisitsafe
AT schaarschmidtc pulsedfieldablationinpatientswithpermanentpacemakerorimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorisitsafe
AT reentst pulsedfieldablationinpatientswithpermanentpacemakerorimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorisitsafe
AT bourierf pulsedfieldablationinpatientswithpermanentpacemakerorimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorisitsafe
AT lengauers pulsedfieldablationinpatientswithpermanentpacemakerorimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorisitsafe
AT bahlkef pulsedfieldablationinpatientswithpermanentpacemakerorimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorisitsafe
AT kraffth pulsedfieldablationinpatientswithpermanentpacemakerorimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorisitsafe
AT knollk pulsedfieldablationinpatientswithpermanentpacemakerorimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorisitsafe
AT englertf pulsedfieldablationinpatientswithpermanentpacemakerorimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorisitsafe
AT telishevskam pulsedfieldablationinpatientswithpermanentpacemakerorimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorisitsafe
AT hesslingg pulsedfieldablationinpatientswithpermanentpacemakerorimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorisitsafe
AT kolbc pulsedfieldablationinpatientswithpermanentpacemakerorimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorisitsafe
AT deisenhoferi pulsedfieldablationinpatientswithpermanentpacemakerorimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorisitsafe
AT kottmaierm pulsedfieldablationinpatientswithpermanentpacemakerorimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorisitsafe