Cargando…
Pulsed-field ablation in patients with permanent pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator: Is it safe?
FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. AIMS: Pulse field ablation (PFA) is a novel catheter ablation technology with safety benefits due to its tissue selectivity. The risk of physical damage or electromagnetic interference (EMI) of PFA with cardiac implantable electronic devices (...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10207290/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.496 |
_version_ | 1785046419670827008 |
---|---|
author | Lennerz, C Oconnor, M Schaarschmidt, C Reents, T Bourier, F Lengauer, S Bahlke, F Krafft, H Knoll, K Englert, F Telishevska, M Hessling, G Kolb, C Deisenhofer, I Kottmaier, M |
author_facet | Lennerz, C Oconnor, M Schaarschmidt, C Reents, T Bourier, F Lengauer, S Bahlke, F Krafft, H Knoll, K Englert, F Telishevska, M Hessling, G Kolb, C Deisenhofer, I Kottmaier, M |
author_sort | Lennerz, C |
collection | PubMed |
description | FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. AIMS: Pulse field ablation (PFA) is a novel catheter ablation technology with safety benefits due to its tissue selectivity. The risk of physical damage or electromagnetic interference (EMI) of PFA with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is unknown. The aim of our study was to assess the risk of PFA for CIEDs. METHODS: PFA lesions (45 per CIED) were applied to CIEDs (<5cm from the lead tip and <15cm from the generator). All devices were checked before and after PFA application for sensing and pacing parameters as well as integrity of shock circuits in ICDs using a heart simulator. Devices were interrogated for any spontaneous reprogramming, mode switching or other EMI effects. RESULTS: In total, 44 CIEDs were tested (16 pacemaker, 21 ICDs, 7 CRT-P/D) with 1,980 PFA applications. There was no change in device settings, functionality, electrical parameters and there was no visible damage to the CIEDs or leads. The risk on a device-based analysis is 0/44 (95% CI 0%-8%) and on a PFA pulse-based analysis is 0/1,980 (95% CI 0%-0.2%). Clinically relevant EMI appeared with oversensing and pacing inhibition, but not tachycardia detection. CONCLUSIONS: Bipolar PFA appears safe and does not result in damage to CIEDs or leads. Clinically relevant EMI does occur, but appropriate peri-procedural programming may mitigate this. In-vivo studies are needed to confirm our findings. [Figure: see text] |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10207290 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102072902023-05-25 Pulsed-field ablation in patients with permanent pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator: Is it safe? Lennerz, C Oconnor, M Schaarschmidt, C Reents, T Bourier, F Lengauer, S Bahlke, F Krafft, H Knoll, K Englert, F Telishevska, M Hessling, G Kolb, C Deisenhofer, I Kottmaier, M Europace 14.5 - Device Complications and Lead Extraction FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. AIMS: Pulse field ablation (PFA) is a novel catheter ablation technology with safety benefits due to its tissue selectivity. The risk of physical damage or electromagnetic interference (EMI) of PFA with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is unknown. The aim of our study was to assess the risk of PFA for CIEDs. METHODS: PFA lesions (45 per CIED) were applied to CIEDs (<5cm from the lead tip and <15cm from the generator). All devices were checked before and after PFA application for sensing and pacing parameters as well as integrity of shock circuits in ICDs using a heart simulator. Devices were interrogated for any spontaneous reprogramming, mode switching or other EMI effects. RESULTS: In total, 44 CIEDs were tested (16 pacemaker, 21 ICDs, 7 CRT-P/D) with 1,980 PFA applications. There was no change in device settings, functionality, electrical parameters and there was no visible damage to the CIEDs or leads. The risk on a device-based analysis is 0/44 (95% CI 0%-8%) and on a PFA pulse-based analysis is 0/1,980 (95% CI 0%-0.2%). Clinically relevant EMI appeared with oversensing and pacing inhibition, but not tachycardia detection. CONCLUSIONS: Bipolar PFA appears safe and does not result in damage to CIEDs or leads. Clinically relevant EMI does occur, but appropriate peri-procedural programming may mitigate this. In-vivo studies are needed to confirm our findings. [Figure: see text] Oxford University Press 2023-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10207290/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.496 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | 14.5 - Device Complications and Lead Extraction Lennerz, C Oconnor, M Schaarschmidt, C Reents, T Bourier, F Lengauer, S Bahlke, F Krafft, H Knoll, K Englert, F Telishevska, M Hessling, G Kolb, C Deisenhofer, I Kottmaier, M Pulsed-field ablation in patients with permanent pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator: Is it safe? |
title | Pulsed-field ablation in patients with permanent pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator: Is it safe? |
title_full | Pulsed-field ablation in patients with permanent pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator: Is it safe? |
title_fullStr | Pulsed-field ablation in patients with permanent pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator: Is it safe? |
title_full_unstemmed | Pulsed-field ablation in patients with permanent pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator: Is it safe? |
title_short | Pulsed-field ablation in patients with permanent pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator: Is it safe? |
title_sort | pulsed-field ablation in patients with permanent pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator: is it safe? |
topic | 14.5 - Device Complications and Lead Extraction |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10207290/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.496 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lennerzc pulsedfieldablationinpatientswithpermanentpacemakerorimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorisitsafe AT oconnorm pulsedfieldablationinpatientswithpermanentpacemakerorimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorisitsafe AT schaarschmidtc pulsedfieldablationinpatientswithpermanentpacemakerorimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorisitsafe AT reentst pulsedfieldablationinpatientswithpermanentpacemakerorimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorisitsafe AT bourierf pulsedfieldablationinpatientswithpermanentpacemakerorimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorisitsafe AT lengauers pulsedfieldablationinpatientswithpermanentpacemakerorimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorisitsafe AT bahlkef pulsedfieldablationinpatientswithpermanentpacemakerorimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorisitsafe AT kraffth pulsedfieldablationinpatientswithpermanentpacemakerorimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorisitsafe AT knollk pulsedfieldablationinpatientswithpermanentpacemakerorimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorisitsafe AT englertf pulsedfieldablationinpatientswithpermanentpacemakerorimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorisitsafe AT telishevskam pulsedfieldablationinpatientswithpermanentpacemakerorimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorisitsafe AT hesslingg pulsedfieldablationinpatientswithpermanentpacemakerorimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorisitsafe AT kolbc pulsedfieldablationinpatientswithpermanentpacemakerorimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorisitsafe AT deisenhoferi pulsedfieldablationinpatientswithpermanentpacemakerorimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorisitsafe AT kottmaierm pulsedfieldablationinpatientswithpermanentpacemakerorimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorisitsafe |