Cargando…
Interim evaluation of insertable cardiac monitor signal quality in the LUX-Dx PERFORM study
FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Boston Scientific Corporation BACKGROUND: The LUX-Dx PERFORM Study is designed to evaluate safety and performance of the LUX-Dx Insertable Cardiac Monitor (ICM) in a general patient population. Although follo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10207394/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.612 |
_version_ | 1785046443171512320 |
---|---|
author | Richards, M Mahajan, D Simon, T Kupfer, M Rajan, A Herrmann, K Rogers, J D Garner, J Pokorney, S |
author_facet | Richards, M Mahajan, D Simon, T Kupfer, M Rajan, A Herrmann, K Rogers, J D Garner, J Pokorney, S |
author_sort | Richards, M |
collection | PubMed |
description | FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Boston Scientific Corporation BACKGROUND: The LUX-Dx PERFORM Study is designed to evaluate safety and performance of the LUX-Dx Insertable Cardiac Monitor (ICM) in a general patient population. Although follow-up is ongoing, enrollment is complete, and at least half of the patients have completed 180 days of follow-up. The visibility (or absence) of P-waves in the ICM-recorded S-ECG is an important feature in the diagnosis of atrial arrhythmias. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the visibility of P-waves in patients enrolled in the LUX-Dx PERFORM study. METHODS: P-wave visibility was evaluated from the first 356 patients enrolled in the LUX-Dx PERFORM study. The daily presenting S-ECGs (10 second rhythm) nearest to Day 7 (+/- 1) and Day 180 (+/- 7) after implant were blindly adjudicated by independent electrophysiologists to calculate the percentage of beats with clearly visible P-waves. RESULTS: Of 636 reviewed S-ECGs, 24 (3.7%) were excluded from analysis for presence of AF rhythm (11), or unavailable data (8 with insufficient adjudication and 5 with no detected R-waves from which to calculate the percentage of beats with visible P-waves). Figure 1 shows an example of a presenting S-ECG rhythm with clearly visible P-waves from the patient management system LATITUDE Clarity. The P-waves were found to be clearly visible in 89.1% of the total heart cycles (Day 7: 90.4%, Day 180: 87.8%). The average difference in percent visibility between Day 7 and Day 180 was approximately 2.2% (p=.248). At a patient level, 88% of patients had visible P-waves in at least one presenting ECG for more than 90% of beats, as shown in Figure 2. In addition, 69% of patients had visible P-waves in both presenting ECGs (Day 7 and Day 180) for at least 90% of beats. CONCLUSION: The LUX-Dx showed consistent visibility of P-waves in the first half of patients enrolled in the LUX-Dx PERFORM study, which represents a general patient population. Adequate P-wave visibility is an important clinical feature in diagnosing atrial arrhythmias and may aid in analysis and clinic workflow efficiency. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10207394 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102073942023-05-25 Interim evaluation of insertable cardiac monitor signal quality in the LUX-Dx PERFORM study Richards, M Mahajan, D Simon, T Kupfer, M Rajan, A Herrmann, K Rogers, J D Garner, J Pokorney, S Europace 9.3 - Diagnostic Methods FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Boston Scientific Corporation BACKGROUND: The LUX-Dx PERFORM Study is designed to evaluate safety and performance of the LUX-Dx Insertable Cardiac Monitor (ICM) in a general patient population. Although follow-up is ongoing, enrollment is complete, and at least half of the patients have completed 180 days of follow-up. The visibility (or absence) of P-waves in the ICM-recorded S-ECG is an important feature in the diagnosis of atrial arrhythmias. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the visibility of P-waves in patients enrolled in the LUX-Dx PERFORM study. METHODS: P-wave visibility was evaluated from the first 356 patients enrolled in the LUX-Dx PERFORM study. The daily presenting S-ECGs (10 second rhythm) nearest to Day 7 (+/- 1) and Day 180 (+/- 7) after implant were blindly adjudicated by independent electrophysiologists to calculate the percentage of beats with clearly visible P-waves. RESULTS: Of 636 reviewed S-ECGs, 24 (3.7%) were excluded from analysis for presence of AF rhythm (11), or unavailable data (8 with insufficient adjudication and 5 with no detected R-waves from which to calculate the percentage of beats with visible P-waves). Figure 1 shows an example of a presenting S-ECG rhythm with clearly visible P-waves from the patient management system LATITUDE Clarity. The P-waves were found to be clearly visible in 89.1% of the total heart cycles (Day 7: 90.4%, Day 180: 87.8%). The average difference in percent visibility between Day 7 and Day 180 was approximately 2.2% (p=.248). At a patient level, 88% of patients had visible P-waves in at least one presenting ECG for more than 90% of beats, as shown in Figure 2. In addition, 69% of patients had visible P-waves in both presenting ECGs (Day 7 and Day 180) for at least 90% of beats. CONCLUSION: The LUX-Dx showed consistent visibility of P-waves in the first half of patients enrolled in the LUX-Dx PERFORM study, which represents a general patient population. Adequate P-wave visibility is an important clinical feature in diagnosing atrial arrhythmias and may aid in analysis and clinic workflow efficiency. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] Oxford University Press 2023-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10207394/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.612 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | 9.3 - Diagnostic Methods Richards, M Mahajan, D Simon, T Kupfer, M Rajan, A Herrmann, K Rogers, J D Garner, J Pokorney, S Interim evaluation of insertable cardiac monitor signal quality in the LUX-Dx PERFORM study |
title | Interim evaluation of insertable cardiac monitor signal quality in the LUX-Dx PERFORM study |
title_full | Interim evaluation of insertable cardiac monitor signal quality in the LUX-Dx PERFORM study |
title_fullStr | Interim evaluation of insertable cardiac monitor signal quality in the LUX-Dx PERFORM study |
title_full_unstemmed | Interim evaluation of insertable cardiac monitor signal quality in the LUX-Dx PERFORM study |
title_short | Interim evaluation of insertable cardiac monitor signal quality in the LUX-Dx PERFORM study |
title_sort | interim evaluation of insertable cardiac monitor signal quality in the lux-dx perform study |
topic | 9.3 - Diagnostic Methods |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10207394/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.612 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT richardsm interimevaluationofinsertablecardiacmonitorsignalqualityintheluxdxperformstudy AT mahajand interimevaluationofinsertablecardiacmonitorsignalqualityintheluxdxperformstudy AT simont interimevaluationofinsertablecardiacmonitorsignalqualityintheluxdxperformstudy AT kupferm interimevaluationofinsertablecardiacmonitorsignalqualityintheluxdxperformstudy AT rajana interimevaluationofinsertablecardiacmonitorsignalqualityintheluxdxperformstudy AT herrmannk interimevaluationofinsertablecardiacmonitorsignalqualityintheluxdxperformstudy AT rogersjd interimevaluationofinsertablecardiacmonitorsignalqualityintheluxdxperformstudy AT garnerj interimevaluationofinsertablecardiacmonitorsignalqualityintheluxdxperformstudy AT pokorneys interimevaluationofinsertablecardiacmonitorsignalqualityintheluxdxperformstudy |