Cargando…

Therapeutic options for syncope: a meta-analysis of trials with and without placebo control

FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: 8% of the population suffer recurrent episodes of syncope which can cause physical injury and psychological morbidity. The extent to which therapeutic options effectively reduce syncope recurrence beyond placebo remain unclear. MET...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaza, N, Sorbini, M, Johal, M, Liu, Z, Porter, B, Nowbar, A, Levy, S, Dani, M, Taraborelli, P, Eardley, P, Whinnett, Z I, Francis, D P, Shun-Shin, M, Lim, P B, Keene, D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10207421/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.255
_version_ 1785046449582505984
author Kaza, N
Sorbini, M
Johal, M
Liu, Z
Porter, B
Nowbar, A
Levy, S
Dani, M
Taraborelli, P
Eardley, P
Whinnett, Z I
Francis, D P
Shun-Shin, M
Lim, P B
Keene, D
author_facet Kaza, N
Sorbini, M
Johal, M
Liu, Z
Porter, B
Nowbar, A
Levy, S
Dani, M
Taraborelli, P
Eardley, P
Whinnett, Z I
Francis, D P
Shun-Shin, M
Lim, P B
Keene, D
author_sort Kaza, N
collection PubMed
description FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: 8% of the population suffer recurrent episodes of syncope which can cause physical injury and psychological morbidity. The extent to which therapeutic options effectively reduce syncope recurrence beyond placebo remain unclear. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of randomised trials including pharmacological, cardiac pacing and physical interventions for syncope. We assessed the effect of these therapeutic interventions on clinical syncope recurrence. We stratified the trials by use of placebo control. RESULTS: There were 50 eligible trials: 22 pacing, 19 pharmacological and 9 of physical interventions including 3,975 patients. Trials assessing syncope recurrence with placebo control were neutral for Beta-Blockers (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.45, p=0.36), Fludrocortisone, (RR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.63 to 1.11 p=0.83) and conventional dual-chamber pacing (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.09 p=0.287). However, they were favourable for Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors [SSRIs] (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.63 p<0.001), Midodrine (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.94, p=0.016) and Closed-Loop-Stimulation (CLS) pacing (RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.34, p < 0.001). Non-placebo-controlled trials reported significant benefit for every category of therapy including conventional dual-chamber pacing, medicines (Beta-Blockers, Midodrine and Oral rehydration salts) and physical interventions including tilt-training. Three categories of therapy have been trialled with and without placebo control: the non-placebo-controlled studies showed significantly different results from their placebo-controlled counterparts (beta-blockers p=0.024, midodrine p=0.006, dual-chamber pacing p=0.017) (figure 2). CONCLUSION: Under placebo-controlled conditions, CLS pacing reduces risk of syncope recurrence by ~75%, whereas conventional pacing does not. SSRIs and midodrine also show significant efficacy under placebo-controlled conditions. Without placebo control, trials consistently show artefactually larger benefits. Future non-placebo-controlled trials for syncope should not be conducted. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10207421
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102074212023-05-25 Therapeutic options for syncope: a meta-analysis of trials with and without placebo control Kaza, N Sorbini, M Johal, M Liu, Z Porter, B Nowbar, A Levy, S Dani, M Taraborelli, P Eardley, P Whinnett, Z I Francis, D P Shun-Shin, M Lim, P B Keene, D Europace 12.4 - Treatment FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: 8% of the population suffer recurrent episodes of syncope which can cause physical injury and psychological morbidity. The extent to which therapeutic options effectively reduce syncope recurrence beyond placebo remain unclear. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of randomised trials including pharmacological, cardiac pacing and physical interventions for syncope. We assessed the effect of these therapeutic interventions on clinical syncope recurrence. We stratified the trials by use of placebo control. RESULTS: There were 50 eligible trials: 22 pacing, 19 pharmacological and 9 of physical interventions including 3,975 patients. Trials assessing syncope recurrence with placebo control were neutral for Beta-Blockers (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.45, p=0.36), Fludrocortisone, (RR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.63 to 1.11 p=0.83) and conventional dual-chamber pacing (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.09 p=0.287). However, they were favourable for Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors [SSRIs] (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.63 p<0.001), Midodrine (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.94, p=0.016) and Closed-Loop-Stimulation (CLS) pacing (RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.34, p < 0.001). Non-placebo-controlled trials reported significant benefit for every category of therapy including conventional dual-chamber pacing, medicines (Beta-Blockers, Midodrine and Oral rehydration salts) and physical interventions including tilt-training. Three categories of therapy have been trialled with and without placebo control: the non-placebo-controlled studies showed significantly different results from their placebo-controlled counterparts (beta-blockers p=0.024, midodrine p=0.006, dual-chamber pacing p=0.017) (figure 2). CONCLUSION: Under placebo-controlled conditions, CLS pacing reduces risk of syncope recurrence by ~75%, whereas conventional pacing does not. SSRIs and midodrine also show significant efficacy under placebo-controlled conditions. Without placebo control, trials consistently show artefactually larger benefits. Future non-placebo-controlled trials for syncope should not be conducted. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] Oxford University Press 2023-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10207421/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.255 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle 12.4 - Treatment
Kaza, N
Sorbini, M
Johal, M
Liu, Z
Porter, B
Nowbar, A
Levy, S
Dani, M
Taraborelli, P
Eardley, P
Whinnett, Z I
Francis, D P
Shun-Shin, M
Lim, P B
Keene, D
Therapeutic options for syncope: a meta-analysis of trials with and without placebo control
title Therapeutic options for syncope: a meta-analysis of trials with and without placebo control
title_full Therapeutic options for syncope: a meta-analysis of trials with and without placebo control
title_fullStr Therapeutic options for syncope: a meta-analysis of trials with and without placebo control
title_full_unstemmed Therapeutic options for syncope: a meta-analysis of trials with and without placebo control
title_short Therapeutic options for syncope: a meta-analysis of trials with and without placebo control
title_sort therapeutic options for syncope: a meta-analysis of trials with and without placebo control
topic 12.4 - Treatment
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10207421/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.255
work_keys_str_mv AT kazan therapeuticoptionsforsyncopeametaanalysisoftrialswithandwithoutplacebocontrol
AT sorbinim therapeuticoptionsforsyncopeametaanalysisoftrialswithandwithoutplacebocontrol
AT johalm therapeuticoptionsforsyncopeametaanalysisoftrialswithandwithoutplacebocontrol
AT liuz therapeuticoptionsforsyncopeametaanalysisoftrialswithandwithoutplacebocontrol
AT porterb therapeuticoptionsforsyncopeametaanalysisoftrialswithandwithoutplacebocontrol
AT nowbara therapeuticoptionsforsyncopeametaanalysisoftrialswithandwithoutplacebocontrol
AT levys therapeuticoptionsforsyncopeametaanalysisoftrialswithandwithoutplacebocontrol
AT danim therapeuticoptionsforsyncopeametaanalysisoftrialswithandwithoutplacebocontrol
AT taraborellip therapeuticoptionsforsyncopeametaanalysisoftrialswithandwithoutplacebocontrol
AT eardleyp therapeuticoptionsforsyncopeametaanalysisoftrialswithandwithoutplacebocontrol
AT whinnettzi therapeuticoptionsforsyncopeametaanalysisoftrialswithandwithoutplacebocontrol
AT francisdp therapeuticoptionsforsyncopeametaanalysisoftrialswithandwithoutplacebocontrol
AT shunshinm therapeuticoptionsforsyncopeametaanalysisoftrialswithandwithoutplacebocontrol
AT limpb therapeuticoptionsforsyncopeametaanalysisoftrialswithandwithoutplacebocontrol
AT keened therapeuticoptionsforsyncopeametaanalysisoftrialswithandwithoutplacebocontrol