Cargando…

Two mechanisms for direction selectivity in a model of the primate starburst amacrine cell

In a recent study, visual signals were recorded for the first time in starburst amacrine cells of the macaque retina, and, as for mouse and rabbit, a directional bias observed in calcium signals was recorded from near the dendritic tips. Stimulus motion from the soma toward the tip generated a large...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Jiajia, Kim, Yeon Jin, Dacey, Dennis M., Troy, John B., Smith, Robert G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10207453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37218623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0952523823000019
_version_ 1785046457529663488
author Wu, Jiajia
Kim, Yeon Jin
Dacey, Dennis M.
Troy, John B.
Smith, Robert G.
author_facet Wu, Jiajia
Kim, Yeon Jin
Dacey, Dennis M.
Troy, John B.
Smith, Robert G.
author_sort Wu, Jiajia
collection PubMed
description In a recent study, visual signals were recorded for the first time in starburst amacrine cells of the macaque retina, and, as for mouse and rabbit, a directional bias observed in calcium signals was recorded from near the dendritic tips. Stimulus motion from the soma toward the tip generated a larger calcium signal than motion from the tip toward the soma. Two mechanisms affecting the spatiotemporal summation of excitatory postsynaptic currents have been proposed to contribute to directional signaling at the dendritic tips of starbursts: (1) a “morphological” mechanism in which electrotonic propagation of excitatory synaptic currents along a dendrite sums bipolar cell inputs at the dendritic tip preferentially for stimulus motion in the centrifugal direction; (2) a “space–time” mechanism that relies on differences in the time-courses of proximal and distal bipolar cell inputs to favor centrifugal stimulus motion. To explore the contributions of these two mechanisms in the primate, we developed a realistic computational model based on connectomic reconstruction of a macaque starburst cell and the distribution of its synaptic inputs from sustained and transient bipolar cell types. Our model suggests that both mechanisms can initiate direction selectivity in starburst dendrites, but their contributions differ depending on the spatiotemporal properties of the stimulus. Specifically, the morphological mechanism dominates when small visual objects are moving at high velocities, and the space–time mechanism contributes most for large visual objects moving at low velocities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10207453
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102074532023-05-27 Two mechanisms for direction selectivity in a model of the primate starburst amacrine cell Wu, Jiajia Kim, Yeon Jin Dacey, Dennis M. Troy, John B. Smith, Robert G. Vis Neurosci Research Article In a recent study, visual signals were recorded for the first time in starburst amacrine cells of the macaque retina, and, as for mouse and rabbit, a directional bias observed in calcium signals was recorded from near the dendritic tips. Stimulus motion from the soma toward the tip generated a larger calcium signal than motion from the tip toward the soma. Two mechanisms affecting the spatiotemporal summation of excitatory postsynaptic currents have been proposed to contribute to directional signaling at the dendritic tips of starbursts: (1) a “morphological” mechanism in which electrotonic propagation of excitatory synaptic currents along a dendrite sums bipolar cell inputs at the dendritic tip preferentially for stimulus motion in the centrifugal direction; (2) a “space–time” mechanism that relies on differences in the time-courses of proximal and distal bipolar cell inputs to favor centrifugal stimulus motion. To explore the contributions of these two mechanisms in the primate, we developed a realistic computational model based on connectomic reconstruction of a macaque starburst cell and the distribution of its synaptic inputs from sustained and transient bipolar cell types. Our model suggests that both mechanisms can initiate direction selectivity in starburst dendrites, but their contributions differ depending on the spatiotemporal properties of the stimulus. Specifically, the morphological mechanism dominates when small visual objects are moving at high velocities, and the space–time mechanism contributes most for large visual objects moving at low velocities. Cambridge University Press 2023-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10207453/ /pubmed/37218623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0952523823000019 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wu, Jiajia
Kim, Yeon Jin
Dacey, Dennis M.
Troy, John B.
Smith, Robert G.
Two mechanisms for direction selectivity in a model of the primate starburst amacrine cell
title Two mechanisms for direction selectivity in a model of the primate starburst amacrine cell
title_full Two mechanisms for direction selectivity in a model of the primate starburst amacrine cell
title_fullStr Two mechanisms for direction selectivity in a model of the primate starburst amacrine cell
title_full_unstemmed Two mechanisms for direction selectivity in a model of the primate starburst amacrine cell
title_short Two mechanisms for direction selectivity in a model of the primate starburst amacrine cell
title_sort two mechanisms for direction selectivity in a model of the primate starburst amacrine cell
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10207453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37218623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0952523823000019
work_keys_str_mv AT wujiajia twomechanismsfordirectionselectivityinamodeloftheprimatestarburstamacrinecell
AT kimyeonjin twomechanismsfordirectionselectivityinamodeloftheprimatestarburstamacrinecell
AT daceydennism twomechanismsfordirectionselectivityinamodeloftheprimatestarburstamacrinecell
AT troyjohnb twomechanismsfordirectionselectivityinamodeloftheprimatestarburstamacrinecell
AT smithrobertg twomechanismsfordirectionselectivityinamodeloftheprimatestarburstamacrinecell