Cargando…
Two mechanisms for direction selectivity in a model of the primate starburst amacrine cell
In a recent study, visual signals were recorded for the first time in starburst amacrine cells of the macaque retina, and, as for mouse and rabbit, a directional bias observed in calcium signals was recorded from near the dendritic tips. Stimulus motion from the soma toward the tip generated a large...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10207453/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37218623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0952523823000019 |
_version_ | 1785046457529663488 |
---|---|
author | Wu, Jiajia Kim, Yeon Jin Dacey, Dennis M. Troy, John B. Smith, Robert G. |
author_facet | Wu, Jiajia Kim, Yeon Jin Dacey, Dennis M. Troy, John B. Smith, Robert G. |
author_sort | Wu, Jiajia |
collection | PubMed |
description | In a recent study, visual signals were recorded for the first time in starburst amacrine cells of the macaque retina, and, as for mouse and rabbit, a directional bias observed in calcium signals was recorded from near the dendritic tips. Stimulus motion from the soma toward the tip generated a larger calcium signal than motion from the tip toward the soma. Two mechanisms affecting the spatiotemporal summation of excitatory postsynaptic currents have been proposed to contribute to directional signaling at the dendritic tips of starbursts: (1) a “morphological” mechanism in which electrotonic propagation of excitatory synaptic currents along a dendrite sums bipolar cell inputs at the dendritic tip preferentially for stimulus motion in the centrifugal direction; (2) a “space–time” mechanism that relies on differences in the time-courses of proximal and distal bipolar cell inputs to favor centrifugal stimulus motion. To explore the contributions of these two mechanisms in the primate, we developed a realistic computational model based on connectomic reconstruction of a macaque starburst cell and the distribution of its synaptic inputs from sustained and transient bipolar cell types. Our model suggests that both mechanisms can initiate direction selectivity in starburst dendrites, but their contributions differ depending on the spatiotemporal properties of the stimulus. Specifically, the morphological mechanism dominates when small visual objects are moving at high velocities, and the space–time mechanism contributes most for large visual objects moving at low velocities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10207453 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102074532023-05-27 Two mechanisms for direction selectivity in a model of the primate starburst amacrine cell Wu, Jiajia Kim, Yeon Jin Dacey, Dennis M. Troy, John B. Smith, Robert G. Vis Neurosci Research Article In a recent study, visual signals were recorded for the first time in starburst amacrine cells of the macaque retina, and, as for mouse and rabbit, a directional bias observed in calcium signals was recorded from near the dendritic tips. Stimulus motion from the soma toward the tip generated a larger calcium signal than motion from the tip toward the soma. Two mechanisms affecting the spatiotemporal summation of excitatory postsynaptic currents have been proposed to contribute to directional signaling at the dendritic tips of starbursts: (1) a “morphological” mechanism in which electrotonic propagation of excitatory synaptic currents along a dendrite sums bipolar cell inputs at the dendritic tip preferentially for stimulus motion in the centrifugal direction; (2) a “space–time” mechanism that relies on differences in the time-courses of proximal and distal bipolar cell inputs to favor centrifugal stimulus motion. To explore the contributions of these two mechanisms in the primate, we developed a realistic computational model based on connectomic reconstruction of a macaque starburst cell and the distribution of its synaptic inputs from sustained and transient bipolar cell types. Our model suggests that both mechanisms can initiate direction selectivity in starburst dendrites, but their contributions differ depending on the spatiotemporal properties of the stimulus. Specifically, the morphological mechanism dominates when small visual objects are moving at high velocities, and the space–time mechanism contributes most for large visual objects moving at low velocities. Cambridge University Press 2023-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10207453/ /pubmed/37218623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0952523823000019 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wu, Jiajia Kim, Yeon Jin Dacey, Dennis M. Troy, John B. Smith, Robert G. Two mechanisms for direction selectivity in a model of the primate starburst amacrine cell |
title | Two mechanisms for direction selectivity in a model of the primate starburst amacrine cell |
title_full | Two mechanisms for direction selectivity in a model of the primate starburst amacrine cell |
title_fullStr | Two mechanisms for direction selectivity in a model of the primate starburst amacrine cell |
title_full_unstemmed | Two mechanisms for direction selectivity in a model of the primate starburst amacrine cell |
title_short | Two mechanisms for direction selectivity in a model of the primate starburst amacrine cell |
title_sort | two mechanisms for direction selectivity in a model of the primate starburst amacrine cell |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10207453/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37218623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0952523823000019 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wujiajia twomechanismsfordirectionselectivityinamodeloftheprimatestarburstamacrinecell AT kimyeonjin twomechanismsfordirectionselectivityinamodeloftheprimatestarburstamacrinecell AT daceydennism twomechanismsfordirectionselectivityinamodeloftheprimatestarburstamacrinecell AT troyjohnb twomechanismsfordirectionselectivityinamodeloftheprimatestarburstamacrinecell AT smithrobertg twomechanismsfordirectionselectivityinamodeloftheprimatestarburstamacrinecell |