Case series of catheter-based arrhythmia ablation in pregnant women

FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: Antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) should be used with caution in treating arrhythmias during pregnancy because of side effects, but catheter ablation is a rarely used procedure. AIM: To investigate the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation in cardiac arrhythmias during pregnancy. METHODS: A double-center retrospective case series study was performed. We studied a population of patients undergoing catheter ablation for cardiac arrhythmias during pregnancy between April 2014 and September 2021 in two cardiovascular centers in Hungary. RESULTS: 14 procedures [14 electrophysiology studies (EPS), 13 ablations] performed on 13 gravid women (age 30.3±5.2 years, primipara n=6) were studied. The mean gestation period was 24.0 (20.0-27.0) weeks at the time of intervention, and the mean duration of arrhythmia was 44.0±53.0 months. Of the pregnant women 38.5% had comorbidities and 15.4% had structural heart disease. During EPS, 12 patients had inducible arrhythmias. Focal atrial tachycardia was confirmed in 3, AVRT via manifest accessory pathway (AP) in 3 (WPW syndrome) AVRT via counceled AP in 1 case. AVNRT was confirmed in 3, sustained ventricular tachycardia in 2 cases (25-25-8.3-25-16.6%). 11 radiofrequency ablations (RFA) (84.6%) and 2 cryoablations (15.4%) were performed. The electroanatomical mapping system was CARTO in 11 cases (84.6%) and NavX-EnSite in 2 cases (15.4%). Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) was used in 5 cases (38.5%). Transseptal puncture was performed in 2 cases (15.4%) due to left lateral AP. The average procedure time was 76.0±33.0 min. All the procedures (100.0%) were performed without fluoroscopy. No complications occurred during the procedures. In the long term, arrhythmia-free survival was achieved in all cases (100.0%), but in two patients, we used AADs to achieve freedom of arrhythmia. With AADs, the mean birth weight was lower than that of fetuses of gravidas not taking drugs (2110±1314 vs. 3253±458 g). APGAR was within the normal range in all cases [9.0/10.0 (IQR) (9.0-10.0/9.3-10.0)]. CONCLUSIONS: Zero-fluoroscopic catheter ablation during pregnancy is an effective and safe treatment method when needed. Catheter ablation for persistent maternal arrhythmias has a more beneficial effect on fetal development than the use of AADs. Indeed, long-term outcome and safety need to be investigated in a larger patient population.