Cargando…

Capsulectomy: a safe and effective way to lower shock impedance in S-ICD replacement procedures

FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) has been proven in various clinical trials. Due to intermuscular device placement, higher shock energy is required for effective treatment o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wuerfel, S, Fastenrath, F, Liebe, V, Akin, I, Borggrefe, M, Duerschmied, D, Kuschyk, J, Rudic, B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10207548/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.422
_version_ 1785046481040834560
author Wuerfel, S
Fastenrath, F
Liebe, V
Akin, I
Borggrefe, M
Duerschmied, D
Kuschyk, J
Rudic, B
author_facet Wuerfel, S
Fastenrath, F
Liebe, V
Akin, I
Borggrefe, M
Duerschmied, D
Kuschyk, J
Rudic, B
author_sort Wuerfel, S
collection PubMed
description FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) has been proven in various clinical trials. Due to intermuscular device placement, higher shock energy is required for effective treatment of ventricular tachyarrhythmia. High shock impedance is a risk marker for ineffective defibrillation. Previous studies have shown reduced shock efficacy in device replacement procedures, possibly due to fibrous encapsulation of the device associated with dwelling time of the system. Therefore, in case of significant capsulation, capsulectomy became part of device replacement procedure in our center. In this study we analyzed the results of intraoperative testing before and after capsulectomy measured by results of high-voltage impedance. PURPOSE: Aim of our study was to show that removal of the fibrous capsulation can help to reduce high voltage impedance without relevant perioperative adverse events at the device replacement procedure. METHODS: Between January 2018 and November 2022, a total of 68 consecutive patients underwent S-ICD device replacement in our center. Pre-operative high-voltage impedance was determined either through recent therapy deliveries or by a 10J test shock immediately before device replacement. Device replacement was performed according to international standards. In case of significant capsulation, additional capsulectomy was performed. Defibrillation testing was routinely performed by the end of the procedure in the absence of contraindications. RESULTS: Of 68 patients, 81% were male, mean age at device replacement was 55 ± 17 years. Most patients were implanted for primary prevention (69%). Defibrillation testing with 65 J at initial device implantation was successful in 87% of patients. Mean dwelling time of the S-ICD System was 61 months (±19 months). Shock impedance increased significantly to 98±33 Ω vs. 80±20 Ω (p=0.013) at initial implantation. Capsulectomy of the S-ICD pocket resulted in a significant decrease of high-voltage impedance to 83±23 Ω as compared to measurement prior to replacement (p=0.03). Defibrillation testing was successful in all patients. First shock efficacy with 65 J was 92%. No acute complications (defined as significant bleeding, prolongation of hospital stay, etc.) were observed in short term follow-up and patients could be discharged as planned. CONCLUSION: Capsulectomy of S-ICD pocket appears to be a safe and effective way to reduce shock impedance which has proven to be a predictor of successful defibrillation in testing as well as in spontaneous episodes. Despite the additional step during device replacement, no complications were observed in our study. Randomized trials regarding defibrillation testing during first implantation are ongoing. Trials addressing the optimal device replacement strategy however are warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10207548
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102075482023-05-25 Capsulectomy: a safe and effective way to lower shock impedance in S-ICD replacement procedures Wuerfel, S Fastenrath, F Liebe, V Akin, I Borggrefe, M Duerschmied, D Kuschyk, J Rudic, B Europace 14.2 - Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) has been proven in various clinical trials. Due to intermuscular device placement, higher shock energy is required for effective treatment of ventricular tachyarrhythmia. High shock impedance is a risk marker for ineffective defibrillation. Previous studies have shown reduced shock efficacy in device replacement procedures, possibly due to fibrous encapsulation of the device associated with dwelling time of the system. Therefore, in case of significant capsulation, capsulectomy became part of device replacement procedure in our center. In this study we analyzed the results of intraoperative testing before and after capsulectomy measured by results of high-voltage impedance. PURPOSE: Aim of our study was to show that removal of the fibrous capsulation can help to reduce high voltage impedance without relevant perioperative adverse events at the device replacement procedure. METHODS: Between January 2018 and November 2022, a total of 68 consecutive patients underwent S-ICD device replacement in our center. Pre-operative high-voltage impedance was determined either through recent therapy deliveries or by a 10J test shock immediately before device replacement. Device replacement was performed according to international standards. In case of significant capsulation, additional capsulectomy was performed. Defibrillation testing was routinely performed by the end of the procedure in the absence of contraindications. RESULTS: Of 68 patients, 81% were male, mean age at device replacement was 55 ± 17 years. Most patients were implanted for primary prevention (69%). Defibrillation testing with 65 J at initial device implantation was successful in 87% of patients. Mean dwelling time of the S-ICD System was 61 months (±19 months). Shock impedance increased significantly to 98±33 Ω vs. 80±20 Ω (p=0.013) at initial implantation. Capsulectomy of the S-ICD pocket resulted in a significant decrease of high-voltage impedance to 83±23 Ω as compared to measurement prior to replacement (p=0.03). Defibrillation testing was successful in all patients. First shock efficacy with 65 J was 92%. No acute complications (defined as significant bleeding, prolongation of hospital stay, etc.) were observed in short term follow-up and patients could be discharged as planned. CONCLUSION: Capsulectomy of S-ICD pocket appears to be a safe and effective way to reduce shock impedance which has proven to be a predictor of successful defibrillation in testing as well as in spontaneous episodes. Despite the additional step during device replacement, no complications were observed in our study. Randomized trials regarding defibrillation testing during first implantation are ongoing. Trials addressing the optimal device replacement strategy however are warranted. Oxford University Press 2023-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10207548/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.422 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle 14.2 - Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD)
Wuerfel, S
Fastenrath, F
Liebe, V
Akin, I
Borggrefe, M
Duerschmied, D
Kuschyk, J
Rudic, B
Capsulectomy: a safe and effective way to lower shock impedance in S-ICD replacement procedures
title Capsulectomy: a safe and effective way to lower shock impedance in S-ICD replacement procedures
title_full Capsulectomy: a safe and effective way to lower shock impedance in S-ICD replacement procedures
title_fullStr Capsulectomy: a safe and effective way to lower shock impedance in S-ICD replacement procedures
title_full_unstemmed Capsulectomy: a safe and effective way to lower shock impedance in S-ICD replacement procedures
title_short Capsulectomy: a safe and effective way to lower shock impedance in S-ICD replacement procedures
title_sort capsulectomy: a safe and effective way to lower shock impedance in s-icd replacement procedures
topic 14.2 - Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10207548/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.422
work_keys_str_mv AT wuerfels capsulectomyasafeandeffectivewaytolowershockimpedanceinsicdreplacementprocedures
AT fastenrathf capsulectomyasafeandeffectivewaytolowershockimpedanceinsicdreplacementprocedures
AT liebev capsulectomyasafeandeffectivewaytolowershockimpedanceinsicdreplacementprocedures
AT akini capsulectomyasafeandeffectivewaytolowershockimpedanceinsicdreplacementprocedures
AT borggrefem capsulectomyasafeandeffectivewaytolowershockimpedanceinsicdreplacementprocedures
AT duerschmiedd capsulectomyasafeandeffectivewaytolowershockimpedanceinsicdreplacementprocedures
AT kuschykj capsulectomyasafeandeffectivewaytolowershockimpedanceinsicdreplacementprocedures
AT rudicb capsulectomyasafeandeffectivewaytolowershockimpedanceinsicdreplacementprocedures