Cargando…

Pulmonary vein reconnection rates and lesion regression during repeat procedures in patients with recurrent arrhythmias after pulsed field ablation pulmonary vein isolation

FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: A novel multipolar pulsed-field ablation (PFA) catheter has recently been introduced for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Pre-market data showed high rates for PVI-durability during mandatory remapping studies 90 days after the firs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kueffer, T, Madaffari, A, Muehl, A, Seiler, J, Thalmann, G, Servatius, H, Kozhuharov, N A, Tanner, H, Haeberlin, A, Noti, A, Baldinger, S H, Roten, L, Reichlin, T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10207565/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.735
_version_ 1785046485208924160
author Kueffer, T
Madaffari, A
Muehl, A
Seiler, J
Thalmann, G
Servatius, H
Kozhuharov, N A
Tanner, H
Haeberlin, A
Noti, A
Baldinger, S H
Roten, L
Reichlin, T
author_facet Kueffer, T
Madaffari, A
Muehl, A
Seiler, J
Thalmann, G
Servatius, H
Kozhuharov, N A
Tanner, H
Haeberlin, A
Noti, A
Baldinger, S H
Roten, L
Reichlin, T
author_sort Kueffer, T
collection PubMed
description FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: A novel multipolar pulsed-field ablation (PFA) catheter has recently been introduced for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Pre-market data showed high rates for PVI-durability during mandatory remapping studies 90 days after the first procedure. Post-market data on PVI durability and lesion regression, particularly in patients with recurrent atrial arrhythmias, are limited. PURPOSE: To characterize the findings on redo cases after previous PFA procedures. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing a redo procedure after an index PFA PVI between May 2021 and October 2022 were included. 3-D electro-anatomical maps (3D-EAM) were acquired in sinus rhythm at the beginning of the redo procedure and compared to the 3D-EAM acquired after ablation during the index procedure. PV-reconnection was assessed on a per-vein and per-patient level and the sites of reconnections were identified. Furthermore, lesions extent was compared between the two maps. RESULTS: Of 265 patients undergoing their first PFA PVI between May 2021 and August 2022, 26 (9.8%) patients with recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia underwent a redo ablation. The phenotype prior to the first PVI was paroxysmal AF in three patients (12%), persistent AF in 85 patients (85%), and left atrial flutter in one (4%) patient. A 31 mm device was used in 81% of the patients. Posterior wall ablation in addition to PVI was performed in three patients. At the end of the first PFA procedure, 100/102 veins (98%, two common ostia) were isolated as evidenced by post ablation 3D-EAM (two LIPV’s could not be isolated). The recurring arrhythmias were AF, atypical flutter, both, and atrial tachycardia in 14 patients (54%), 5 patients (19%), 6 patients (23%) and 1 (4%) respectively. High-density 3D-EAM identified 65/100 (65%) PVs with persistent isolation. In 7 (27%) patients, all PVs were isolated. Reconnection occurred most frequently in the right inferior PV (11, 42%) followed by the left superior PV (9, 36%), the right superior PV (8, 31%), the left inferior PV (6, 27%), and the left common ostium (1, 50%). The predominant reconnection sites were located anterior of the superior veins, and on the inferior aspect of the right inferior PV (Figure). On the posterior wall, the distance between the lesions of the left pulmonary veins and the right pulmonary veins increased by a median of 5 mm [0, 10] between the index and Redo procedure. CONCLUSION: In patients with recurrent atrial arrhythmias after PFA PVI, PV reconnections were found in 73% of the patients and in 35% of the veins. The reconnections were most prevalent on the anterior aspects of the upper veins, as well as on the inferior aspect of the right inferior vein. [Figure: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10207565
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102075652023-05-25 Pulmonary vein reconnection rates and lesion regression during repeat procedures in patients with recurrent arrhythmias after pulsed field ablation pulmonary vein isolation Kueffer, T Madaffari, A Muehl, A Seiler, J Thalmann, G Servatius, H Kozhuharov, N A Tanner, H Haeberlin, A Noti, A Baldinger, S H Roten, L Reichlin, T Europace 9.4.4 - Catheter Ablation of Arrhythmias FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: A novel multipolar pulsed-field ablation (PFA) catheter has recently been introduced for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Pre-market data showed high rates for PVI-durability during mandatory remapping studies 90 days after the first procedure. Post-market data on PVI durability and lesion regression, particularly in patients with recurrent atrial arrhythmias, are limited. PURPOSE: To characterize the findings on redo cases after previous PFA procedures. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing a redo procedure after an index PFA PVI between May 2021 and October 2022 were included. 3-D electro-anatomical maps (3D-EAM) were acquired in sinus rhythm at the beginning of the redo procedure and compared to the 3D-EAM acquired after ablation during the index procedure. PV-reconnection was assessed on a per-vein and per-patient level and the sites of reconnections were identified. Furthermore, lesions extent was compared between the two maps. RESULTS: Of 265 patients undergoing their first PFA PVI between May 2021 and August 2022, 26 (9.8%) patients with recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia underwent a redo ablation. The phenotype prior to the first PVI was paroxysmal AF in three patients (12%), persistent AF in 85 patients (85%), and left atrial flutter in one (4%) patient. A 31 mm device was used in 81% of the patients. Posterior wall ablation in addition to PVI was performed in three patients. At the end of the first PFA procedure, 100/102 veins (98%, two common ostia) were isolated as evidenced by post ablation 3D-EAM (two LIPV’s could not be isolated). The recurring arrhythmias were AF, atypical flutter, both, and atrial tachycardia in 14 patients (54%), 5 patients (19%), 6 patients (23%) and 1 (4%) respectively. High-density 3D-EAM identified 65/100 (65%) PVs with persistent isolation. In 7 (27%) patients, all PVs were isolated. Reconnection occurred most frequently in the right inferior PV (11, 42%) followed by the left superior PV (9, 36%), the right superior PV (8, 31%), the left inferior PV (6, 27%), and the left common ostium (1, 50%). The predominant reconnection sites were located anterior of the superior veins, and on the inferior aspect of the right inferior PV (Figure). On the posterior wall, the distance between the lesions of the left pulmonary veins and the right pulmonary veins increased by a median of 5 mm [0, 10] between the index and Redo procedure. CONCLUSION: In patients with recurrent atrial arrhythmias after PFA PVI, PV reconnections were found in 73% of the patients and in 35% of the veins. The reconnections were most prevalent on the anterior aspects of the upper veins, as well as on the inferior aspect of the right inferior vein. [Figure: see text] Oxford University Press 2023-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10207565/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.735 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle 9.4.4 - Catheter Ablation of Arrhythmias
Kueffer, T
Madaffari, A
Muehl, A
Seiler, J
Thalmann, G
Servatius, H
Kozhuharov, N A
Tanner, H
Haeberlin, A
Noti, A
Baldinger, S H
Roten, L
Reichlin, T
Pulmonary vein reconnection rates and lesion regression during repeat procedures in patients with recurrent arrhythmias after pulsed field ablation pulmonary vein isolation
title Pulmonary vein reconnection rates and lesion regression during repeat procedures in patients with recurrent arrhythmias after pulsed field ablation pulmonary vein isolation
title_full Pulmonary vein reconnection rates and lesion regression during repeat procedures in patients with recurrent arrhythmias after pulsed field ablation pulmonary vein isolation
title_fullStr Pulmonary vein reconnection rates and lesion regression during repeat procedures in patients with recurrent arrhythmias after pulsed field ablation pulmonary vein isolation
title_full_unstemmed Pulmonary vein reconnection rates and lesion regression during repeat procedures in patients with recurrent arrhythmias after pulsed field ablation pulmonary vein isolation
title_short Pulmonary vein reconnection rates and lesion regression during repeat procedures in patients with recurrent arrhythmias after pulsed field ablation pulmonary vein isolation
title_sort pulmonary vein reconnection rates and lesion regression during repeat procedures in patients with recurrent arrhythmias after pulsed field ablation pulmonary vein isolation
topic 9.4.4 - Catheter Ablation of Arrhythmias
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10207565/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.735
work_keys_str_mv AT kueffert pulmonaryveinreconnectionratesandlesionregressionduringrepeatproceduresinpatientswithrecurrentarrhythmiasafterpulsedfieldablationpulmonaryveinisolation
AT madaffaria pulmonaryveinreconnectionratesandlesionregressionduringrepeatproceduresinpatientswithrecurrentarrhythmiasafterpulsedfieldablationpulmonaryveinisolation
AT muehla pulmonaryveinreconnectionratesandlesionregressionduringrepeatproceduresinpatientswithrecurrentarrhythmiasafterpulsedfieldablationpulmonaryveinisolation
AT seilerj pulmonaryveinreconnectionratesandlesionregressionduringrepeatproceduresinpatientswithrecurrentarrhythmiasafterpulsedfieldablationpulmonaryveinisolation
AT thalmanng pulmonaryveinreconnectionratesandlesionregressionduringrepeatproceduresinpatientswithrecurrentarrhythmiasafterpulsedfieldablationpulmonaryveinisolation
AT servatiush pulmonaryveinreconnectionratesandlesionregressionduringrepeatproceduresinpatientswithrecurrentarrhythmiasafterpulsedfieldablationpulmonaryveinisolation
AT kozhuharovna pulmonaryveinreconnectionratesandlesionregressionduringrepeatproceduresinpatientswithrecurrentarrhythmiasafterpulsedfieldablationpulmonaryveinisolation
AT tannerh pulmonaryveinreconnectionratesandlesionregressionduringrepeatproceduresinpatientswithrecurrentarrhythmiasafterpulsedfieldablationpulmonaryveinisolation
AT haeberlina pulmonaryveinreconnectionratesandlesionregressionduringrepeatproceduresinpatientswithrecurrentarrhythmiasafterpulsedfieldablationpulmonaryveinisolation
AT notia pulmonaryveinreconnectionratesandlesionregressionduringrepeatproceduresinpatientswithrecurrentarrhythmiasafterpulsedfieldablationpulmonaryveinisolation
AT baldingersh pulmonaryveinreconnectionratesandlesionregressionduringrepeatproceduresinpatientswithrecurrentarrhythmiasafterpulsedfieldablationpulmonaryveinisolation
AT rotenl pulmonaryveinreconnectionratesandlesionregressionduringrepeatproceduresinpatientswithrecurrentarrhythmiasafterpulsedfieldablationpulmonaryveinisolation
AT reichlint pulmonaryveinreconnectionratesandlesionregressionduringrepeatproceduresinpatientswithrecurrentarrhythmiasafterpulsedfieldablationpulmonaryveinisolation