Cargando…
Device-related infection in a large tertiary center-Benefit of the antibacterial envelope
FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection carry a high morbidity and mortality. According to current data, the risk for a device-related infection is in a range of 0.6-3.4 % due to the latest EHRA consensus practical g...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10207573/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.494 |
_version_ | 1785046487121526784 |
---|---|
author | Hofer, D Avdi, D Ruegg, P Saguner, A M Molitor, N Breitenstein, A |
author_facet | Hofer, D Avdi, D Ruegg, P Saguner, A M Molitor, N Breitenstein, A |
author_sort | Hofer, D |
collection | PubMed |
description | FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection carry a high morbidity and mortality. According to current data, the risk for a device-related infection is in a range of 0.6-3.4 % due to the latest EHRA consensus practical guide (reference 1). The use of an antibacterial envelope was associated with a reduced risk for infection in a large randomized trial (reference 2). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the one-year risk of device-related infections in a large tertiary center in Switzerland during the time period of 2014-2019 (period A where the antibacterial envelope used only occasionally) in comparison to the risk of infection during the year 2020 (Period B, one year where in all device-interventions an antibacterial envelope was used). The presence of a local or systemic, device-related infection was counted as an infection event. RESULTS: In this retrospective analysis from two large Swiss implantation centres, a total of 1776 patients were included from the time period 2014-2020. 1’457 derived from period A (2014-2019) where the antibacterial envelope was only used in 2.6 % of the interventions compared to period B with 319 patients where in all interventions the envelope was present. There were no demographic or baseline characteristic differences between the two groups (table 1) except for the presence of a larger population of patients suffering from valvular heart disease (30.3 % during period A versus 10.8 % during period B) but without an relevant difference in the use of anticoagulation. The risk for device-related infection during period A was 0.96 % (N=14) versus only 0.63 % (N=2) during time period B which equals a relative risk reduction of 34.8 %. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the antibacterial envelope during device-interventions was associated with a 34.5% relative risk reduction in a large tertiary Swiss center. Keeping in mind the potential additional burden of device-infection related treatment, it is of paramount importance to reduce the risk for device-associated infections. [Figure: see text] |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10207573 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102075732023-05-25 Device-related infection in a large tertiary center-Benefit of the antibacterial envelope Hofer, D Avdi, D Ruegg, P Saguner, A M Molitor, N Breitenstein, A Europace 14.5 - Device Complications and Lead Extraction FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection carry a high morbidity and mortality. According to current data, the risk for a device-related infection is in a range of 0.6-3.4 % due to the latest EHRA consensus practical guide (reference 1). The use of an antibacterial envelope was associated with a reduced risk for infection in a large randomized trial (reference 2). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the one-year risk of device-related infections in a large tertiary center in Switzerland during the time period of 2014-2019 (period A where the antibacterial envelope used only occasionally) in comparison to the risk of infection during the year 2020 (Period B, one year where in all device-interventions an antibacterial envelope was used). The presence of a local or systemic, device-related infection was counted as an infection event. RESULTS: In this retrospective analysis from two large Swiss implantation centres, a total of 1776 patients were included from the time period 2014-2020. 1’457 derived from period A (2014-2019) where the antibacterial envelope was only used in 2.6 % of the interventions compared to period B with 319 patients where in all interventions the envelope was present. There were no demographic or baseline characteristic differences between the two groups (table 1) except for the presence of a larger population of patients suffering from valvular heart disease (30.3 % during period A versus 10.8 % during period B) but without an relevant difference in the use of anticoagulation. The risk for device-related infection during period A was 0.96 % (N=14) versus only 0.63 % (N=2) during time period B which equals a relative risk reduction of 34.8 %. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the antibacterial envelope during device-interventions was associated with a 34.5% relative risk reduction in a large tertiary Swiss center. Keeping in mind the potential additional burden of device-infection related treatment, it is of paramount importance to reduce the risk for device-associated infections. [Figure: see text] Oxford University Press 2023-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10207573/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.494 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | 14.5 - Device Complications and Lead Extraction Hofer, D Avdi, D Ruegg, P Saguner, A M Molitor, N Breitenstein, A Device-related infection in a large tertiary center-Benefit of the antibacterial envelope |
title | Device-related infection in a large tertiary center-Benefit of the antibacterial envelope |
title_full | Device-related infection in a large tertiary center-Benefit of the antibacterial envelope |
title_fullStr | Device-related infection in a large tertiary center-Benefit of the antibacterial envelope |
title_full_unstemmed | Device-related infection in a large tertiary center-Benefit of the antibacterial envelope |
title_short | Device-related infection in a large tertiary center-Benefit of the antibacterial envelope |
title_sort | device-related infection in a large tertiary center-benefit of the antibacterial envelope |
topic | 14.5 - Device Complications and Lead Extraction |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10207573/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.494 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hoferd devicerelatedinfectioninalargetertiarycenterbenefitoftheantibacterialenvelope AT avdid devicerelatedinfectioninalargetertiarycenterbenefitoftheantibacterialenvelope AT rueggp devicerelatedinfectioninalargetertiarycenterbenefitoftheantibacterialenvelope AT saguneram devicerelatedinfectioninalargetertiarycenterbenefitoftheantibacterialenvelope AT molitorn devicerelatedinfectioninalargetertiarycenterbenefitoftheantibacterialenvelope AT breitensteina devicerelatedinfectioninalargetertiarycenterbenefitoftheantibacterialenvelope |