Cargando…

Evaluation of insertable cardiac monitor placement and safety in the LUX-Dx PERFORM study

FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Boston Scientific Corporation BACKGROUND: The LUX-Dx PERFORM Study is designed to evaluate safety and performance of the LUX-Dx insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) in a general patient population. Enrollment and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Richards, M, Stolen, C, Simon, T, Stoltz, T, Manyam, H, Dukes, J W, Bavikati, V, Rosman, J, Rogers, J D, Garner, J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10207579/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.654
_version_ 1785046488523472896
author Richards, M
Stolen, C
Simon, T
Stoltz, T
Manyam, H
Dukes, J W
Bavikati, V
Rosman, J
Rogers, J D
Garner, J
author_facet Richards, M
Stolen, C
Simon, T
Stoltz, T
Manyam, H
Dukes, J W
Bavikati, V
Rosman, J
Rogers, J D
Garner, J
author_sort Richards, M
collection PubMed
description FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Boston Scientific Corporation BACKGROUND: The LUX-Dx PERFORM Study is designed to evaluate safety and performance of the LUX-Dx insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) in a general patient population. Enrollment and device insertions are complete, and all patients have completed 30 days of follow-up. This abstract describes the study population, characterizes device insertion, and reports on preliminary data for ICM system-related complications. METHODS: The LUX-Dx PERFORM study is a prospective, multi-center, single arm, post-market, observational study. The ICM system-related complication-free rate (CFR) at 30 days post-insertion was calculated using Kaplan-Meier methodology and the 97.5% one-side lower confidence limit (LCL) was compared to the prespecified performance target of 94%. All ICM system-related adverse events were adjudicated by independent physician reviewers. RESULTS: 727 patients were enrolled at 24 centers in the United States from March 2021 to May 2022. The study population was 49% male, 91% white and 66+/-14 years old. 717 patients had device insertions and were successfully registered in the LATITUDE Clarity data management system. There were 9 withdrawals prior to insertion and 1 aborted procedure due to deployment difficulty. ICM insertion was performed in-hospital 76% of the time (N=547) and in-clinic 24% of the time (N=171). 96% were de novo device insertions. A variety of closure techniques were used including surgical glue (62%), adhesive strips (45%), sutures (42%), and staples (9%). Median procedure time was 4 minutes (range 1 - 37). There were 4 ICM system-related complications in the first 30 days (CFR 99%, LCL 99%) which meets the acute safety performance goal. The system-related complications include 1 case of ICM deployment difficulty, 1 case of device expulsion three days post insertion, and 2 infections that were treated with oral antibiotics and resolved without further mitigation. CONCLUSION: The LUX-Dx ICM can be inserted quickly, in both hospital and clinic settings, with a very low complication rate. [Figure: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10207579
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102075792023-05-25 Evaluation of insertable cardiac monitor placement and safety in the LUX-Dx PERFORM study Richards, M Stolen, C Simon, T Stoltz, T Manyam, H Dukes, J W Bavikati, V Rosman, J Rogers, J D Garner, J Europace 9.3.8 - Invasive Diagnostic Methods FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Boston Scientific Corporation BACKGROUND: The LUX-Dx PERFORM Study is designed to evaluate safety and performance of the LUX-Dx insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) in a general patient population. Enrollment and device insertions are complete, and all patients have completed 30 days of follow-up. This abstract describes the study population, characterizes device insertion, and reports on preliminary data for ICM system-related complications. METHODS: The LUX-Dx PERFORM study is a prospective, multi-center, single arm, post-market, observational study. The ICM system-related complication-free rate (CFR) at 30 days post-insertion was calculated using Kaplan-Meier methodology and the 97.5% one-side lower confidence limit (LCL) was compared to the prespecified performance target of 94%. All ICM system-related adverse events were adjudicated by independent physician reviewers. RESULTS: 727 patients were enrolled at 24 centers in the United States from March 2021 to May 2022. The study population was 49% male, 91% white and 66+/-14 years old. 717 patients had device insertions and were successfully registered in the LATITUDE Clarity data management system. There were 9 withdrawals prior to insertion and 1 aborted procedure due to deployment difficulty. ICM insertion was performed in-hospital 76% of the time (N=547) and in-clinic 24% of the time (N=171). 96% were de novo device insertions. A variety of closure techniques were used including surgical glue (62%), adhesive strips (45%), sutures (42%), and staples (9%). Median procedure time was 4 minutes (range 1 - 37). There were 4 ICM system-related complications in the first 30 days (CFR 99%, LCL 99%) which meets the acute safety performance goal. The system-related complications include 1 case of ICM deployment difficulty, 1 case of device expulsion three days post insertion, and 2 infections that were treated with oral antibiotics and resolved without further mitigation. CONCLUSION: The LUX-Dx ICM can be inserted quickly, in both hospital and clinic settings, with a very low complication rate. [Figure: see text] Oxford University Press 2023-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10207579/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.654 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle 9.3.8 - Invasive Diagnostic Methods
Richards, M
Stolen, C
Simon, T
Stoltz, T
Manyam, H
Dukes, J W
Bavikati, V
Rosman, J
Rogers, J D
Garner, J
Evaluation of insertable cardiac monitor placement and safety in the LUX-Dx PERFORM study
title Evaluation of insertable cardiac monitor placement and safety in the LUX-Dx PERFORM study
title_full Evaluation of insertable cardiac monitor placement and safety in the LUX-Dx PERFORM study
title_fullStr Evaluation of insertable cardiac monitor placement and safety in the LUX-Dx PERFORM study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of insertable cardiac monitor placement and safety in the LUX-Dx PERFORM study
title_short Evaluation of insertable cardiac monitor placement and safety in the LUX-Dx PERFORM study
title_sort evaluation of insertable cardiac monitor placement and safety in the lux-dx perform study
topic 9.3.8 - Invasive Diagnostic Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10207579/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.654
work_keys_str_mv AT richardsm evaluationofinsertablecardiacmonitorplacementandsafetyintheluxdxperformstudy
AT stolenc evaluationofinsertablecardiacmonitorplacementandsafetyintheluxdxperformstudy
AT simont evaluationofinsertablecardiacmonitorplacementandsafetyintheluxdxperformstudy
AT stoltzt evaluationofinsertablecardiacmonitorplacementandsafetyintheluxdxperformstudy
AT manyamh evaluationofinsertablecardiacmonitorplacementandsafetyintheluxdxperformstudy
AT dukesjw evaluationofinsertablecardiacmonitorplacementandsafetyintheluxdxperformstudy
AT bavikativ evaluationofinsertablecardiacmonitorplacementandsafetyintheluxdxperformstudy
AT rosmanj evaluationofinsertablecardiacmonitorplacementandsafetyintheluxdxperformstudy
AT rogersjd evaluationofinsertablecardiacmonitorplacementandsafetyintheluxdxperformstudy
AT garnerj evaluationofinsertablecardiacmonitorplacementandsafetyintheluxdxperformstudy