Electroanatomical voltage mapping with a force-sensing technology catheter for diagnosis of Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy (ARVC)

FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. INTRODUCTION: Invasive three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping (EAM) can be helpful to diagnose arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). Contact force sensing catheters (CFSC) represent the gold standard to verify adequate tissue contact during EAM. However, normal reference values for right ventricular (RV) EAM as well as substrate characterization in patients with ARVC using CFSC have not been systematically investigated, which was the aim of this prospective study. METHODS: EAM of the RV during sinus rhythm was performed with the Thermocool SmartTouch catheter via a long sheath in the CARTO3 system in 11 patients with definite ARVC and 5 age- and gender-matched control subjects without structural heart disease. Only points with a mean contact force of ≥4G were analyzed. To account for differences due to RV anatomy, it was divided into 5 segments: RV outflow tract (RVOT), septum, free wall, sub-tricuspid region and apex. Endocardial bipolar and unipolar voltages, signal characteristics and signal duration were analyzed. The impact of catheter orientation on endocardial signals was also assessed. RESULTS: A median of 227 (IQR:120-364) endocardial RV points were analyzed. Median bipolar voltage in healthy controls was 3.8mV (range 3.6-4.6, IQR 2.7-5.4), with lower values in the RVOT and higher values in the RV septum. ARVC patients showed significantly lower bipolar voltages as compared to controls (repeated measures ANOVA; between-subjects effect: F=6.443,p=0.024), showing significantly lower bipolar voltage values in the sub-tricuspid region (1.8±1.9vs.4.6±2.9mV,p=0.031) and in the RV apex (2.9±1.4vs.7.2±5.2mV,p=0.024), Figure 1c. Bipolar voltage values in all RV regions yielded a high sensitivity and specificity for ARVC diagnosis (AUC62-78%,p<0.001 for all), with the highest performance for the sub-tricuspid region (AUC78%,95%CI0.75-0.81,p<0.001). A bipolar voltage value <1.5mV in the sub-tricuspid region yielded a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 53% for ARVC diagnosis (Figure 1a-b, showing the typical RV free wall "C-scar" in ARVC and normal values for the RV apex in less advanced disease stages). A positive correlation between bipolar voltage values and an orthogonal catheter orientation (46°-90°: r=0.106,p<0.001) as well as a higher catheter contact force (r=0.054,p=0.008), and a negative correlation between bipolar voltage values and QRS duration (r=-0.370,p<0.001) was found. CONCLUSIONS: For the first time a systematic analysis of RV endocardial low voltage areas in ARVC patients as compared to controls by using CFSC was performed, and confirmed that RV voltages are generally lower in ARVC as compared to controls, with the sub-tricuspid area showing the lowest values and highest discriminatory power vs controls. [Figure: see text]