Self-taught ultrasound-guided axillary vein access for pacemaker implantations - complication rates and outcomes

FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are the mainstream therapy for advanced atrioventricular block or sustained ventricular arrhythmia. EHRA survey (1) showed that cephalic vein dissection and blind subclavian vein puncture are the preferred techniques for the implantation of CIED leads in European centres. Ultrasound (US) guided axillary puncture has emerged as feasible alternative for safe and rapid venous access for lead implantation. However, insufficient evidence to support its widespread adoption. AIM: To compare the complication rates and clinical outcomes of CIED implantations utilising self-taught US guided axillary puncture versus non-US guided venous access (Subclavian puncture and fluroscopy guided axillary puncture). Assess the mean time to gain venous access and overall success rate in US guided technique. METHODS: Retrospective , observational study across two sites involving all CIED implantations of four experienced implanters over the year from January 2021 - June 2022. Patient's demographics, venous access time, complications and clinical outcomes were extracted from electronic database. US axillary access technique was self-taught. RESULTS AND OUTCOMES: Venous access was obtained by US Guided axillary puncture in 146 patients, non-US guided in 208 patients. Successful axillary venous access by ultrasound guidance is 97%(146/151) with mean time to venous access of 2.1 minutes. Baseline demographics (age, gender) and comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, cardiomyopathy, coronary artery disease, dyslipidemia, renal failure, oral steroid use, nicotine use) were similar between both US-guide and non-US guided groups, usage of oral anticoagulations (32.9% vs 39.4%,p=0.208) and antiplatelet agents(28.1% vs 35.1%,p=0.164) were not statistically different. Greater proportion of dual chamber pacemakers were implanted in US guided access group versus non-US guided (39.7% vs 27.9%,p=0.015). US Guided axillary access resulted in lower overall complication rate (2.1% vs 8.9%, p=0.0196): lower risk of pneumothorax (0% vs 3.8%,p=0.0236), lower risk of haemathoma (0% vs 3.4%,p=0.0448). No difference in short term pocket/lead infection or lead displacement. Severe vascular complications remains low in both groups. Stepwise binary regression analysis demonstrated US guidance as independent predictor of lower overall complication rate, odd-ratio 0.195 (95% CI 0.054 - 0.706). Summary: This multi-centered, retospective observational study demonstrated that US guided axillary access has high overall success rate, not time consuming and resulted in lower complication rates (especially pneumothorax and pocket haemathoma), despite the US access technique being self-taught and have greater proportion of dual chamber device implantations. US guided axillary access is demonstrated to be independently associated with 5-fold lower risk of complications.