Cargando…

Evaluating the application of the 2009 Institute of Medicine gestational weight gain guidelines on pregnant Chinese women

BACKGROUND: The 2009 Institute of Medicine (IOM) gestational weight gain (GWG) guidelines were initially developed for pregnant women in the United States. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate whether the IOM guidelines were suitable for pregnant Chinese women. METHODS: A retrospective cohort...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiang, Haili, Jia, Yin, Wang, Xueying, Zhang, Chengyan, Li, Yue, Wang, Huili
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10208122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37220022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2023.2213494
_version_ 1785046604875563008
author Jiang, Haili
Jia, Yin
Wang, Xueying
Zhang, Chengyan
Li, Yue
Wang, Huili
author_facet Jiang, Haili
Jia, Yin
Wang, Xueying
Zhang, Chengyan
Li, Yue
Wang, Huili
author_sort Jiang, Haili
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The 2009 Institute of Medicine (IOM) gestational weight gain (GWG) guidelines were initially developed for pregnant women in the United States. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate whether the IOM guidelines were suitable for pregnant Chinese women. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study comprising 20,593 singleton pregnant women was conducted at the Beijing Obstetrics and Gynaecology Hospital (1 January 2018 to 31 December 2019). Applicability was evaluated by comparing the GWG corresponding to the lowest point of the predicted composite risk curve with the 2009 IOM GWG Guidelines. The IOM Guidelines serve as the standard for the GWG categories and the pre-pregnancy body mass index. An exponential function model was used to fit the weight gain during pregnancy and the probability of caesarean section, preterm birth, small for gestational age, and large for gestational age. A quadratic function model was used to fit the combined probability of the above-mentioned adverse pregnancy outcomes. The applicability of the IOM guidelines was evaluated by comparing the weights corresponding to the lowest predicted probability with the GWG range recommended by the IOM guidelines. RESULTS: According to the 2009 IOM GWG Guidelines, 43% of the women achieved adequate weight, almost 32% gained excessive weight, and 25% gained inadequate weight. The GWG range proposed by the IOM included the lowest predicted probability value for underweight women and exceeded the lowest predicted probability for normal weight, overweight, and obese women. CONCLUSIONS: The 2009 IOM guidelines were suitable for Chinese women whose pre-pregnancy body mass index was classified as underweight. The guidelines were not suitable for normal, overweight, or obese pre-pregnancy body mass index classifications. Therefore, based on the above evidence, the 2009 IOM guidelines are not suitable for all Chinese women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10208122
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102081222023-05-25 Evaluating the application of the 2009 Institute of Medicine gestational weight gain guidelines on pregnant Chinese women Jiang, Haili Jia, Yin Wang, Xueying Zhang, Chengyan Li, Yue Wang, Huili Glob Health Action Research Article BACKGROUND: The 2009 Institute of Medicine (IOM) gestational weight gain (GWG) guidelines were initially developed for pregnant women in the United States. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate whether the IOM guidelines were suitable for pregnant Chinese women. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study comprising 20,593 singleton pregnant women was conducted at the Beijing Obstetrics and Gynaecology Hospital (1 January 2018 to 31 December 2019). Applicability was evaluated by comparing the GWG corresponding to the lowest point of the predicted composite risk curve with the 2009 IOM GWG Guidelines. The IOM Guidelines serve as the standard for the GWG categories and the pre-pregnancy body mass index. An exponential function model was used to fit the weight gain during pregnancy and the probability of caesarean section, preterm birth, small for gestational age, and large for gestational age. A quadratic function model was used to fit the combined probability of the above-mentioned adverse pregnancy outcomes. The applicability of the IOM guidelines was evaluated by comparing the weights corresponding to the lowest predicted probability with the GWG range recommended by the IOM guidelines. RESULTS: According to the 2009 IOM GWG Guidelines, 43% of the women achieved adequate weight, almost 32% gained excessive weight, and 25% gained inadequate weight. The GWG range proposed by the IOM included the lowest predicted probability value for underweight women and exceeded the lowest predicted probability for normal weight, overweight, and obese women. CONCLUSIONS: The 2009 IOM guidelines were suitable for Chinese women whose pre-pregnancy body mass index was classified as underweight. The guidelines were not suitable for normal, overweight, or obese pre-pregnancy body mass index classifications. Therefore, based on the above evidence, the 2009 IOM guidelines are not suitable for all Chinese women. Taylor & Francis 2023-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10208122/ /pubmed/37220022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2023.2213494 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jiang, Haili
Jia, Yin
Wang, Xueying
Zhang, Chengyan
Li, Yue
Wang, Huili
Evaluating the application of the 2009 Institute of Medicine gestational weight gain guidelines on pregnant Chinese women
title Evaluating the application of the 2009 Institute of Medicine gestational weight gain guidelines on pregnant Chinese women
title_full Evaluating the application of the 2009 Institute of Medicine gestational weight gain guidelines on pregnant Chinese women
title_fullStr Evaluating the application of the 2009 Institute of Medicine gestational weight gain guidelines on pregnant Chinese women
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the application of the 2009 Institute of Medicine gestational weight gain guidelines on pregnant Chinese women
title_short Evaluating the application of the 2009 Institute of Medicine gestational weight gain guidelines on pregnant Chinese women
title_sort evaluating the application of the 2009 institute of medicine gestational weight gain guidelines on pregnant chinese women
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10208122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37220022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2023.2213494
work_keys_str_mv AT jianghaili evaluatingtheapplicationofthe2009instituteofmedicinegestationalweightgainguidelinesonpregnantchinesewomen
AT jiayin evaluatingtheapplicationofthe2009instituteofmedicinegestationalweightgainguidelinesonpregnantchinesewomen
AT wangxueying evaluatingtheapplicationofthe2009instituteofmedicinegestationalweightgainguidelinesonpregnantchinesewomen
AT zhangchengyan evaluatingtheapplicationofthe2009instituteofmedicinegestationalweightgainguidelinesonpregnantchinesewomen
AT liyue evaluatingtheapplicationofthe2009instituteofmedicinegestationalweightgainguidelinesonpregnantchinesewomen
AT wanghuili evaluatingtheapplicationofthe2009instituteofmedicinegestationalweightgainguidelinesonpregnantchinesewomen