Cargando…

Are irrelevant items actively deleted from visual working memory?: No evidence from repulsion and attraction effects in dual-retrocue tasks

Some theories propose that working memory (WM) involves the active deletion of irrelevant information, including items that were retained in WM, but are no longer relevant for ongoing cognition. Considerable evidence suggests that active-deletion occurs for categorical representations, but whether i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rhilinger, Joshua P., Xu, Chenlingxi, Rose, Nathan S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10208559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37226042
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-023-02724-2
_version_ 1785046694861209600
author Rhilinger, Joshua P.
Xu, Chenlingxi
Rose, Nathan S.
author_facet Rhilinger, Joshua P.
Xu, Chenlingxi
Rose, Nathan S.
author_sort Rhilinger, Joshua P.
collection PubMed
description Some theories propose that working memory (WM) involves the active deletion of irrelevant information, including items that were retained in WM, but are no longer relevant for ongoing cognition. Considerable evidence suggests that active-deletion occurs for categorical representations, but whether it also occurs for recall of features that are typically bound together in an object, such as line orientations, is unclear. In two experiments, with or without binding instructions, healthy young adults maintained two orientations, focused attention to recall the orientation cued first, and then switched attention to recall the orientation cued second, at which point the uncued orientation was no longer relevant on the trial. In contrast to the active-deletion hypothesis, the results showed that the no-longer-relevant items exerted the strongest bias on participants’ recall, which was either repulsive or attractive depending on both the degree of difference between the target and nontarget orientations and the proximity to cardinal axes. We suggest that visual WM can bind features like line orientations into chunked representations, and an irrelevant feature of a chunked object cannot be actively deleted – it biases recall of the target feature. Models of WM need to be updated to explain this and related dynamic phenomena. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.3758/s13414-023-02724-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10208559
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102085592023-05-25 Are irrelevant items actively deleted from visual working memory?: No evidence from repulsion and attraction effects in dual-retrocue tasks Rhilinger, Joshua P. Xu, Chenlingxi Rose, Nathan S. Atten Percept Psychophys Article Some theories propose that working memory (WM) involves the active deletion of irrelevant information, including items that were retained in WM, but are no longer relevant for ongoing cognition. Considerable evidence suggests that active-deletion occurs for categorical representations, but whether it also occurs for recall of features that are typically bound together in an object, such as line orientations, is unclear. In two experiments, with or without binding instructions, healthy young adults maintained two orientations, focused attention to recall the orientation cued first, and then switched attention to recall the orientation cued second, at which point the uncued orientation was no longer relevant on the trial. In contrast to the active-deletion hypothesis, the results showed that the no-longer-relevant items exerted the strongest bias on participants’ recall, which was either repulsive or attractive depending on both the degree of difference between the target and nontarget orientations and the proximity to cardinal axes. We suggest that visual WM can bind features like line orientations into chunked representations, and an irrelevant feature of a chunked object cannot be actively deleted – it biases recall of the target feature. Models of WM need to be updated to explain this and related dynamic phenomena. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.3758/s13414-023-02724-2. Springer US 2023-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10208559/ /pubmed/37226042 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-023-02724-2 Text en © The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Rhilinger, Joshua P.
Xu, Chenlingxi
Rose, Nathan S.
Are irrelevant items actively deleted from visual working memory?: No evidence from repulsion and attraction effects in dual-retrocue tasks
title Are irrelevant items actively deleted from visual working memory?: No evidence from repulsion and attraction effects in dual-retrocue tasks
title_full Are irrelevant items actively deleted from visual working memory?: No evidence from repulsion and attraction effects in dual-retrocue tasks
title_fullStr Are irrelevant items actively deleted from visual working memory?: No evidence from repulsion and attraction effects in dual-retrocue tasks
title_full_unstemmed Are irrelevant items actively deleted from visual working memory?: No evidence from repulsion and attraction effects in dual-retrocue tasks
title_short Are irrelevant items actively deleted from visual working memory?: No evidence from repulsion and attraction effects in dual-retrocue tasks
title_sort are irrelevant items actively deleted from visual working memory?: no evidence from repulsion and attraction effects in dual-retrocue tasks
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10208559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37226042
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-023-02724-2
work_keys_str_mv AT rhilingerjoshuap areirrelevantitemsactivelydeletedfromvisualworkingmemorynoevidencefromrepulsionandattractioneffectsindualretrocuetasks
AT xuchenlingxi areirrelevantitemsactivelydeletedfromvisualworkingmemorynoevidencefromrepulsionandattractioneffectsindualretrocuetasks
AT rosenathans areirrelevantitemsactivelydeletedfromvisualworkingmemorynoevidencefromrepulsionandattractioneffectsindualretrocuetasks