Cargando…

Management of decontamination in chemical accidents: a laboratory model

Rapid and efficient decontamination of the skin is a major task for emergency rescue services in the event of a chemical accident involving humans. While rinsing the skin with water (and soap) has been the standard procedure, some skepticism has developed in recent years regarding the situational su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hundhammer, Tobias, Lindner, Regina, Caccia, Leopold, Langbehn, Hannes, Petermichl, Walter, Dittmar, Michael, Gruber, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10209179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37225760
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35248-8
_version_ 1785046821639290880
author Hundhammer, Tobias
Lindner, Regina
Caccia, Leopold
Langbehn, Hannes
Petermichl, Walter
Dittmar, Michael
Gruber, Michael
author_facet Hundhammer, Tobias
Lindner, Regina
Caccia, Leopold
Langbehn, Hannes
Petermichl, Walter
Dittmar, Michael
Gruber, Michael
author_sort Hundhammer, Tobias
collection PubMed
description Rapid and efficient decontamination of the skin is a major task for emergency rescue services in the event of a chemical accident involving humans. While rinsing the skin with water (and soap) has been the standard procedure, some skepticism has developed in recent years regarding the situational suitability of this method. The efficacy of three different decontamination materials/techniques (Easyderm® cleaning cloth, water-soaked all-purpose sponge, rinsing with water) in removing Capsaicin, Bromadiolone, Paraquat and 2,2′-dichlorodiethylether (DCEE) from porcine skin was compared. Different cleaning motions (wiping, twisting, pressing) with the Easyderm® were evaluated for their effectiveness in removing Capsaicin from porcine skin. Finally, the impact of different exposure times of the skin to Capsaicin on the decontamination process were investigated. Contaminant recovery rates (CRRs) were analysed in the skin and in each decontamination material using high-performance-liquid-chromatography (HPLC; used for Capsaicin, Bromadiolone, Paraquat) or gas chromatography (GC; used for DCEE). Wiping the skin with the amphiphilic Easyderm® was most effective for decontamination of Capsaicin and DCEE, while the water rinsing method gave the best results for removing Paraquat and Bromadiolone. Both wiping with the Easyderm® and rotating the Easyderm® were significantly more effective in cleaning Capsaicin-contaminated skin than pressing the Easyderm® on the contamination area alone. Prolonged exposure times of the porcine skin to Capsaicin were associated with a decrease in efficacy of the following decontamination. Emergency rescue services should have materials available that can remove both hydrophilic and hydrophobic substances from skin. Since not all of our results for comparing different decontamination materials were as distinct as we expected, there are likely several other factors determining the efficacy of skin decontamination in some cases. Time is key; therefore, first responders should try to begin the decontamination process as soon as possible after arriving at the scene.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10209179
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102091792023-05-26 Management of decontamination in chemical accidents: a laboratory model Hundhammer, Tobias Lindner, Regina Caccia, Leopold Langbehn, Hannes Petermichl, Walter Dittmar, Michael Gruber, Michael Sci Rep Article Rapid and efficient decontamination of the skin is a major task for emergency rescue services in the event of a chemical accident involving humans. While rinsing the skin with water (and soap) has been the standard procedure, some skepticism has developed in recent years regarding the situational suitability of this method. The efficacy of three different decontamination materials/techniques (Easyderm® cleaning cloth, water-soaked all-purpose sponge, rinsing with water) in removing Capsaicin, Bromadiolone, Paraquat and 2,2′-dichlorodiethylether (DCEE) from porcine skin was compared. Different cleaning motions (wiping, twisting, pressing) with the Easyderm® were evaluated for their effectiveness in removing Capsaicin from porcine skin. Finally, the impact of different exposure times of the skin to Capsaicin on the decontamination process were investigated. Contaminant recovery rates (CRRs) were analysed in the skin and in each decontamination material using high-performance-liquid-chromatography (HPLC; used for Capsaicin, Bromadiolone, Paraquat) or gas chromatography (GC; used for DCEE). Wiping the skin with the amphiphilic Easyderm® was most effective for decontamination of Capsaicin and DCEE, while the water rinsing method gave the best results for removing Paraquat and Bromadiolone. Both wiping with the Easyderm® and rotating the Easyderm® were significantly more effective in cleaning Capsaicin-contaminated skin than pressing the Easyderm® on the contamination area alone. Prolonged exposure times of the porcine skin to Capsaicin were associated with a decrease in efficacy of the following decontamination. Emergency rescue services should have materials available that can remove both hydrophilic and hydrophobic substances from skin. Since not all of our results for comparing different decontamination materials were as distinct as we expected, there are likely several other factors determining the efficacy of skin decontamination in some cases. Time is key; therefore, first responders should try to begin the decontamination process as soon as possible after arriving at the scene. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10209179/ /pubmed/37225760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35248-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Hundhammer, Tobias
Lindner, Regina
Caccia, Leopold
Langbehn, Hannes
Petermichl, Walter
Dittmar, Michael
Gruber, Michael
Management of decontamination in chemical accidents: a laboratory model
title Management of decontamination in chemical accidents: a laboratory model
title_full Management of decontamination in chemical accidents: a laboratory model
title_fullStr Management of decontamination in chemical accidents: a laboratory model
title_full_unstemmed Management of decontamination in chemical accidents: a laboratory model
title_short Management of decontamination in chemical accidents: a laboratory model
title_sort management of decontamination in chemical accidents: a laboratory model
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10209179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37225760
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35248-8
work_keys_str_mv AT hundhammertobias managementofdecontaminationinchemicalaccidentsalaboratorymodel
AT lindnerregina managementofdecontaminationinchemicalaccidentsalaboratorymodel
AT caccialeopold managementofdecontaminationinchemicalaccidentsalaboratorymodel
AT langbehnhannes managementofdecontaminationinchemicalaccidentsalaboratorymodel
AT petermichlwalter managementofdecontaminationinchemicalaccidentsalaboratorymodel
AT dittmarmichael managementofdecontaminationinchemicalaccidentsalaboratorymodel
AT grubermichael managementofdecontaminationinchemicalaccidentsalaboratorymodel