Cargando…

Correction factors for commissioning and patient specific quality assurance of stereotactic fields in a Monte Carlo based treatment planning system: TPS correction factors

Validation of small field dosimetry is crucial for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Accurate and considered measurement of linear accelerator dose must be compared to precise and accurate calculation by the treatment planning system (TPS). Monte Carlo calcul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goodall, Simon K., Rowshanfarzad, Pejman, Ebert, Martin A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10209265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37022612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13246-023-01246-3
_version_ 1785046840006148096
author Goodall, Simon K.
Rowshanfarzad, Pejman
Ebert, Martin A.
author_facet Goodall, Simon K.
Rowshanfarzad, Pejman
Ebert, Martin A.
author_sort Goodall, Simon K.
collection PubMed
description Validation of small field dosimetry is crucial for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Accurate and considered measurement of linear accelerator dose must be compared to precise and accurate calculation by the treatment planning system (TPS). Monte Carlo calculated distributions contain statistical noise, reducing the reliance that should be given to single voxel doses. The average dose to a small volume of interest (VOI) can minimise the influence of noise, but for small fields introduces significant volume averaging. Similar challenges present during measurement of composite dose from clinical plans when a small volume ionisation chamber is used. This study derived correction factors for VOI averaged TPS doses calculated for small fields, allowing correction to an isocentre dose following account for statistical noise. These factors were used to determine an optimal VOI to represent small volume ionisation chambers during patient specific quality assurance (PSQA). A retrospective comparison of 82 SRS and 28 SBRT PSQA measurements to TPS calculated doses from varying VOI was completed to evaluate the determined volumes. Small field commissioning correction factors of under 5% were obtained for field sizes of 8 mm and larger. Optimal spherical VOI with radius between 1.5 and 1.8 mm and 2.5 to 2.9 mm were determined for IBA CC01 and CC04 ionisation chambers respectively. Review of PSQA confirmed an optimal agreement between CC01 measured doses and a volume of 1.5 to 1.8 mm while CC04 measured doses showed no variation with VOI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10209265
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102092652023-05-26 Correction factors for commissioning and patient specific quality assurance of stereotactic fields in a Monte Carlo based treatment planning system: TPS correction factors Goodall, Simon K. Rowshanfarzad, Pejman Ebert, Martin A. Phys Eng Sci Med Scientific Paper Validation of small field dosimetry is crucial for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Accurate and considered measurement of linear accelerator dose must be compared to precise and accurate calculation by the treatment planning system (TPS). Monte Carlo calculated distributions contain statistical noise, reducing the reliance that should be given to single voxel doses. The average dose to a small volume of interest (VOI) can minimise the influence of noise, but for small fields introduces significant volume averaging. Similar challenges present during measurement of composite dose from clinical plans when a small volume ionisation chamber is used. This study derived correction factors for VOI averaged TPS doses calculated for small fields, allowing correction to an isocentre dose following account for statistical noise. These factors were used to determine an optimal VOI to represent small volume ionisation chambers during patient specific quality assurance (PSQA). A retrospective comparison of 82 SRS and 28 SBRT PSQA measurements to TPS calculated doses from varying VOI was completed to evaluate the determined volumes. Small field commissioning correction factors of under 5% were obtained for field sizes of 8 mm and larger. Optimal spherical VOI with radius between 1.5 and 1.8 mm and 2.5 to 2.9 mm were determined for IBA CC01 and CC04 ionisation chambers respectively. Review of PSQA confirmed an optimal agreement between CC01 measured doses and a volume of 1.5 to 1.8 mm while CC04 measured doses showed no variation with VOI. Springer International Publishing 2023-04-06 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10209265/ /pubmed/37022612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13246-023-01246-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Scientific Paper
Goodall, Simon K.
Rowshanfarzad, Pejman
Ebert, Martin A.
Correction factors for commissioning and patient specific quality assurance of stereotactic fields in a Monte Carlo based treatment planning system: TPS correction factors
title Correction factors for commissioning and patient specific quality assurance of stereotactic fields in a Monte Carlo based treatment planning system: TPS correction factors
title_full Correction factors for commissioning and patient specific quality assurance of stereotactic fields in a Monte Carlo based treatment planning system: TPS correction factors
title_fullStr Correction factors for commissioning and patient specific quality assurance of stereotactic fields in a Monte Carlo based treatment planning system: TPS correction factors
title_full_unstemmed Correction factors for commissioning and patient specific quality assurance of stereotactic fields in a Monte Carlo based treatment planning system: TPS correction factors
title_short Correction factors for commissioning and patient specific quality assurance of stereotactic fields in a Monte Carlo based treatment planning system: TPS correction factors
title_sort correction factors for commissioning and patient specific quality assurance of stereotactic fields in a monte carlo based treatment planning system: tps correction factors
topic Scientific Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10209265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37022612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13246-023-01246-3
work_keys_str_mv AT goodallsimonk correctionfactorsforcommissioningandpatientspecificqualityassuranceofstereotacticfieldsinamontecarlobasedtreatmentplanningsystemtpscorrectionfactors
AT rowshanfarzadpejman correctionfactorsforcommissioningandpatientspecificqualityassuranceofstereotacticfieldsinamontecarlobasedtreatmentplanningsystemtpscorrectionfactors
AT ebertmartina correctionfactorsforcommissioningandpatientspecificqualityassuranceofstereotacticfieldsinamontecarlobasedtreatmentplanningsystemtpscorrectionfactors