Cargando…

Analysis of the threshold image contrast obtained with the CDMAM 3.4 and CDMAM 4.0 phantoms

Quality control in mammography is a very important element. One of the parameters indicating the appropriate image quality is the threshold image contrast. The CDMAM phantom is used to measure this parameter. It is currently available in two versions 3.4 and 4.0. The aim of this work is to compare t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Biegała, Michał, Jakubowska, Teresa, Stępińska, Anna, Woźniak, Piotr
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10209289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37185808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13246-023-01264-1
_version_ 1785046845704110080
author Biegała, Michał
Jakubowska, Teresa
Stępińska, Anna
Woźniak, Piotr
author_facet Biegała, Michał
Jakubowska, Teresa
Stępińska, Anna
Woźniak, Piotr
author_sort Biegała, Michał
collection PubMed
description Quality control in mammography is a very important element. One of the parameters indicating the appropriate image quality is the threshold image contrast. The CDMAM phantom is used to measure this parameter. It is currently available in two versions 3.4 and 4.0. The aim of this work is to compare the threshold image contrast readings obtained with the CDMAM 3.4 and CDMAM 4.0 phantoms. In the measurements, 9 CDMAM 4.0 phantoms were used to check the difference in indications of individual copies. The phantom whose readings were closest to the average of all readings was used for comparative measurements with the CDMAM 3.4 phantom. Measurements were made on 40 mammography devices. The obtained images were read with the software provided by the phantom manufacturer and the CDMAM Analysis v2.3.0 (NCCPM) software. The average percentage difference between the minimum and maximum values indicated by the CDMAM 4.0 phantoms was 10.09%. Using the CDMAM Analysis v2.3.0 (NCCPM) software, the average difference in readings between the CDMAM 3.4 and CDMAM 4.0 phantoms is 7.93%, and when using the software provided by the phantom manufacturer, it is as much as 60.15%. The obtained results of the threshold image contrast are affected by the type of software used for reading and the accuracy of the execution of individual elements of the phantom. It is recommended to use CDMAM Analysis v2.3.0 (NCCPM) software or the latest software provided by the phantom manufacturer to read the phantom images.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10209289
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102092892023-05-26 Analysis of the threshold image contrast obtained with the CDMAM 3.4 and CDMAM 4.0 phantoms Biegała, Michał Jakubowska, Teresa Stępińska, Anna Woźniak, Piotr Phys Eng Sci Med Scientific Paper Quality control in mammography is a very important element. One of the parameters indicating the appropriate image quality is the threshold image contrast. The CDMAM phantom is used to measure this parameter. It is currently available in two versions 3.4 and 4.0. The aim of this work is to compare the threshold image contrast readings obtained with the CDMAM 3.4 and CDMAM 4.0 phantoms. In the measurements, 9 CDMAM 4.0 phantoms were used to check the difference in indications of individual copies. The phantom whose readings were closest to the average of all readings was used for comparative measurements with the CDMAM 3.4 phantom. Measurements were made on 40 mammography devices. The obtained images were read with the software provided by the phantom manufacturer and the CDMAM Analysis v2.3.0 (NCCPM) software. The average percentage difference between the minimum and maximum values indicated by the CDMAM 4.0 phantoms was 10.09%. Using the CDMAM Analysis v2.3.0 (NCCPM) software, the average difference in readings between the CDMAM 3.4 and CDMAM 4.0 phantoms is 7.93%, and when using the software provided by the phantom manufacturer, it is as much as 60.15%. The obtained results of the threshold image contrast are affected by the type of software used for reading and the accuracy of the execution of individual elements of the phantom. It is recommended to use CDMAM Analysis v2.3.0 (NCCPM) software or the latest software provided by the phantom manufacturer to read the phantom images. Springer International Publishing 2023-04-25 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10209289/ /pubmed/37185808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13246-023-01264-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Scientific Paper
Biegała, Michał
Jakubowska, Teresa
Stępińska, Anna
Woźniak, Piotr
Analysis of the threshold image contrast obtained with the CDMAM 3.4 and CDMAM 4.0 phantoms
title Analysis of the threshold image contrast obtained with the CDMAM 3.4 and CDMAM 4.0 phantoms
title_full Analysis of the threshold image contrast obtained with the CDMAM 3.4 and CDMAM 4.0 phantoms
title_fullStr Analysis of the threshold image contrast obtained with the CDMAM 3.4 and CDMAM 4.0 phantoms
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the threshold image contrast obtained with the CDMAM 3.4 and CDMAM 4.0 phantoms
title_short Analysis of the threshold image contrast obtained with the CDMAM 3.4 and CDMAM 4.0 phantoms
title_sort analysis of the threshold image contrast obtained with the cdmam 3.4 and cdmam 4.0 phantoms
topic Scientific Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10209289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37185808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13246-023-01264-1
work_keys_str_mv AT biegałamichał analysisofthethresholdimagecontrastobtainedwiththecdmam34andcdmam40phantoms
AT jakubowskateresa analysisofthethresholdimagecontrastobtainedwiththecdmam34andcdmam40phantoms
AT stepinskaanna analysisofthethresholdimagecontrastobtainedwiththecdmam34andcdmam40phantoms
AT wozniakpiotr analysisofthethresholdimagecontrastobtainedwiththecdmam34andcdmam40phantoms