Cargando…

Performance of deep learning algorithms to distinguish high-grade glioma from low-grade glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

This study aims to evaluate deep learning (DL) performance in differentiating low- and high-grade glioma. Search online database for studies continuously published from 1st January 2015 until 16th August 2022. The random-effects model was used for synthesis, based on pooled sensitivity (SE), specifi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Wanyi, Song, Cheng, Tang, Chao, Pan, Chenghao, Xue, Peng, Fan, Jinhu, Qiao, Youlin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10209541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37250800
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.106815
_version_ 1785046897912709120
author Sun, Wanyi
Song, Cheng
Tang, Chao
Pan, Chenghao
Xue, Peng
Fan, Jinhu
Qiao, Youlin
author_facet Sun, Wanyi
Song, Cheng
Tang, Chao
Pan, Chenghao
Xue, Peng
Fan, Jinhu
Qiao, Youlin
author_sort Sun, Wanyi
collection PubMed
description This study aims to evaluate deep learning (DL) performance in differentiating low- and high-grade glioma. Search online database for studies continuously published from 1st January 2015 until 16th August 2022. The random-effects model was used for synthesis, based on pooled sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), and area under the curve (AUC). Heterogeneity was estimated using the Higgins inconsistency index (I(2)). 33 were ultimately included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled SE and SP were 94% and 93%, with an AUC of 0.98. There was great heterogeneity in this field. Our evidence-based study shows DL achieves high accuracy in glioma grading. Subgroup analysis reveals several limitations in this field: 1) Diagnostic trials require standard method for data merging for AI; 2) small sample size; 3) poor-quality image preprocessing; 4) not standard algorithm development; 5) not standard data report; 6) different definition of HGG and LGG; and 7) poor extrapolation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10209541
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102095412023-05-26 Performance of deep learning algorithms to distinguish high-grade glioma from low-grade glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis Sun, Wanyi Song, Cheng Tang, Chao Pan, Chenghao Xue, Peng Fan, Jinhu Qiao, Youlin iScience Article This study aims to evaluate deep learning (DL) performance in differentiating low- and high-grade glioma. Search online database for studies continuously published from 1st January 2015 until 16th August 2022. The random-effects model was used for synthesis, based on pooled sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), and area under the curve (AUC). Heterogeneity was estimated using the Higgins inconsistency index (I(2)). 33 were ultimately included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled SE and SP were 94% and 93%, with an AUC of 0.98. There was great heterogeneity in this field. Our evidence-based study shows DL achieves high accuracy in glioma grading. Subgroup analysis reveals several limitations in this field: 1) Diagnostic trials require standard method for data merging for AI; 2) small sample size; 3) poor-quality image preprocessing; 4) not standard algorithm development; 5) not standard data report; 6) different definition of HGG and LGG; and 7) poor extrapolation. Elsevier 2023-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10209541/ /pubmed/37250800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.106815 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sun, Wanyi
Song, Cheng
Tang, Chao
Pan, Chenghao
Xue, Peng
Fan, Jinhu
Qiao, Youlin
Performance of deep learning algorithms to distinguish high-grade glioma from low-grade glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Performance of deep learning algorithms to distinguish high-grade glioma from low-grade glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Performance of deep learning algorithms to distinguish high-grade glioma from low-grade glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Performance of deep learning algorithms to distinguish high-grade glioma from low-grade glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Performance of deep learning algorithms to distinguish high-grade glioma from low-grade glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Performance of deep learning algorithms to distinguish high-grade glioma from low-grade glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort performance of deep learning algorithms to distinguish high-grade glioma from low-grade glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10209541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37250800
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.106815
work_keys_str_mv AT sunwanyi performanceofdeeplearningalgorithmstodistinguishhighgradegliomafromlowgradegliomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT songcheng performanceofdeeplearningalgorithmstodistinguishhighgradegliomafromlowgradegliomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tangchao performanceofdeeplearningalgorithmstodistinguishhighgradegliomafromlowgradegliomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT panchenghao performanceofdeeplearningalgorithmstodistinguishhighgradegliomafromlowgradegliomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xuepeng performanceofdeeplearningalgorithmstodistinguishhighgradegliomafromlowgradegliomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fanjinhu performanceofdeeplearningalgorithmstodistinguishhighgradegliomafromlowgradegliomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT qiaoyoulin performanceofdeeplearningalgorithmstodistinguishhighgradegliomafromlowgradegliomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis