Cargando…

Morphometry around Cochleostomy Site to Aid Safe Cochlear Implantation

INTRODUCTION: In morphologically normal-appearing inner ears, measurements of the distance between the round window and carotid canal (RCD), the maximum diameter of the basal turn of the cochlea next to the round window (BD), and the thickness of the promontory (PT) just lateral to the basal turn ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kavitha, Yellur, Joish, Upendra Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10209812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37251294
http://dx.doi.org/10.22038/IJORL.2023.65579.3249
_version_ 1785046958032814080
author Kavitha, Yellur
Joish, Upendra Kumar
author_facet Kavitha, Yellur
Joish, Upendra Kumar
author_sort Kavitha, Yellur
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In morphologically normal-appearing inner ears, measurements of the distance between the round window and carotid canal (RCD), the maximum diameter of the basal turn of the cochlea next to the round window (BD), and the thickness of the promontory (PT) just lateral to the basal turn may be used as guide for safe cochleostomy and implant placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January to March 2022, a cross-sectional observational study was carried out in a tertiary care hospital. The round window to carotid canal distance (RCD), the largest diameter of the cochlea's basal turn next to the round window (BD), and the thickness of the promontory immediately lateral to the basal turn (PT) were measured using CT temporal bone images of 150 persons without cochlear abnormalities. The values obtained were compared using Paired T-test for significance of difference between both genders and sides. RESULTS: A total of 150 participants—75 men and 75 women—with a mean age of 37.5 years were enrolled in the study. With a range of 7.18 mm to 10.52 mm, the mean RCD was 8.84 mm (SD 0.8 mm). The mean BD was 2.27 mm (SD 0.4 mm), while the mean PT was 1.15 mm (SD 0. mm). The values obtained did not differ significantly in both the genders and the right and left sides (p = 0.37 and 0.24, respectively). CONCLUSION: The present study has defined and calculated pertinent measures at cochleostomy site that will aid safe electrode insertion and prevent misplacement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10209812
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102098122023-05-26 Morphometry around Cochleostomy Site to Aid Safe Cochlear Implantation Kavitha, Yellur Joish, Upendra Kumar Iran J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article INTRODUCTION: In morphologically normal-appearing inner ears, measurements of the distance between the round window and carotid canal (RCD), the maximum diameter of the basal turn of the cochlea next to the round window (BD), and the thickness of the promontory (PT) just lateral to the basal turn may be used as guide for safe cochleostomy and implant placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January to March 2022, a cross-sectional observational study was carried out in a tertiary care hospital. The round window to carotid canal distance (RCD), the largest diameter of the cochlea's basal turn next to the round window (BD), and the thickness of the promontory immediately lateral to the basal turn (PT) were measured using CT temporal bone images of 150 persons without cochlear abnormalities. The values obtained were compared using Paired T-test for significance of difference between both genders and sides. RESULTS: A total of 150 participants—75 men and 75 women—with a mean age of 37.5 years were enrolled in the study. With a range of 7.18 mm to 10.52 mm, the mean RCD was 8.84 mm (SD 0.8 mm). The mean BD was 2.27 mm (SD 0.4 mm), while the mean PT was 1.15 mm (SD 0. mm). The values obtained did not differ significantly in both the genders and the right and left sides (p = 0.37 and 0.24, respectively). CONCLUSION: The present study has defined and calculated pertinent measures at cochleostomy site that will aid safe electrode insertion and prevent misplacement. Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 2023-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10209812/ /pubmed/37251294 http://dx.doi.org/10.22038/IJORL.2023.65579.3249 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) ) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kavitha, Yellur
Joish, Upendra Kumar
Morphometry around Cochleostomy Site to Aid Safe Cochlear Implantation
title Morphometry around Cochleostomy Site to Aid Safe Cochlear Implantation
title_full Morphometry around Cochleostomy Site to Aid Safe Cochlear Implantation
title_fullStr Morphometry around Cochleostomy Site to Aid Safe Cochlear Implantation
title_full_unstemmed Morphometry around Cochleostomy Site to Aid Safe Cochlear Implantation
title_short Morphometry around Cochleostomy Site to Aid Safe Cochlear Implantation
title_sort morphometry around cochleostomy site to aid safe cochlear implantation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10209812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37251294
http://dx.doi.org/10.22038/IJORL.2023.65579.3249
work_keys_str_mv AT kavithayellur morphometryaroundcochleostomysitetoaidsafecochlearimplantation
AT joishupendrakumar morphometryaroundcochleostomysitetoaidsafecochlearimplantation