Cargando…
Split‐face evaluation: Gluconolactone plus oxybrasion versus gluconolactone plus microneedling. The effects on skin parameters
BACKGROUND: The application of polyhydroxy acids and alpha‐hydroxy acids to the skin is often used in cosmetology. To enhance the effect of gluconolactone chemical peeling, a combined method including water‐oxygen oxybrasion or microneedle mesotherapy can be used. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate skin parame...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10209840/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37357656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.13353 |
_version_ | 1785046962115969024 |
---|---|
author | Jarząbek‐Perz, Sylwia Dziedzic, Marta Kołodziejczak, Anna Rotsztejn, Helena |
author_facet | Jarząbek‐Perz, Sylwia Dziedzic, Marta Kołodziejczak, Anna Rotsztejn, Helena |
author_sort | Jarząbek‐Perz, Sylwia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The application of polyhydroxy acids and alpha‐hydroxy acids to the skin is often used in cosmetology. To enhance the effect of gluconolactone chemical peeling, a combined method including water‐oxygen oxybrasion or microneedle mesotherapy can be used. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate skin parameters such as hydration, sebum, pH and TEWL after application of a 10% gluconolactone chemical peel in combination with oxybrasion and microneedling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty‐one Caucasian women participated in the study. A series of three split face treatments was carried out at 1‐week intervals. Oxybrasion was performed on the right side of the face and micro‐needle mesotherapy on the left side. A 10% gluconolactone solution was applied to the entire face. Before the first and third treatments and 2 weeks after the last treatment, skin parameters were evaluated. Photographic documentation was also made before and after the treatment series. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Evaluation of skin parameters using Courage & Khazaka 580 Multi Probe Adapter probes (Courage + Khazaka electronic GmbH, Cologne, Germany) showed an increase in hydration and a decrease in sebum, pH and TEWL for both treatments. There were no statistically significant differences between the treatments. Combining chemical peeling of gluconolactone with oxybrasion and microneedle mesotherapy is a good method to seal the hydrolipid barrier and increase skin hydration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10209840 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102098402023-08-11 Split‐face evaluation: Gluconolactone plus oxybrasion versus gluconolactone plus microneedling. The effects on skin parameters Jarząbek‐Perz, Sylwia Dziedzic, Marta Kołodziejczak, Anna Rotsztejn, Helena Skin Res Technol Original Articles BACKGROUND: The application of polyhydroxy acids and alpha‐hydroxy acids to the skin is often used in cosmetology. To enhance the effect of gluconolactone chemical peeling, a combined method including water‐oxygen oxybrasion or microneedle mesotherapy can be used. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate skin parameters such as hydration, sebum, pH and TEWL after application of a 10% gluconolactone chemical peel in combination with oxybrasion and microneedling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty‐one Caucasian women participated in the study. A series of three split face treatments was carried out at 1‐week intervals. Oxybrasion was performed on the right side of the face and micro‐needle mesotherapy on the left side. A 10% gluconolactone solution was applied to the entire face. Before the first and third treatments and 2 weeks after the last treatment, skin parameters were evaluated. Photographic documentation was also made before and after the treatment series. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Evaluation of skin parameters using Courage & Khazaka 580 Multi Probe Adapter probes (Courage + Khazaka electronic GmbH, Cologne, Germany) showed an increase in hydration and a decrease in sebum, pH and TEWL for both treatments. There were no statistically significant differences between the treatments. Combining chemical peeling of gluconolactone with oxybrasion and microneedle mesotherapy is a good method to seal the hydrolipid barrier and increase skin hydration. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10209840/ /pubmed/37357656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.13353 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Skin Research and Technology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Jarząbek‐Perz, Sylwia Dziedzic, Marta Kołodziejczak, Anna Rotsztejn, Helena Split‐face evaluation: Gluconolactone plus oxybrasion versus gluconolactone plus microneedling. The effects on skin parameters |
title | Split‐face evaluation: Gluconolactone plus oxybrasion versus gluconolactone plus microneedling. The effects on skin parameters |
title_full | Split‐face evaluation: Gluconolactone plus oxybrasion versus gluconolactone plus microneedling. The effects on skin parameters |
title_fullStr | Split‐face evaluation: Gluconolactone plus oxybrasion versus gluconolactone plus microneedling. The effects on skin parameters |
title_full_unstemmed | Split‐face evaluation: Gluconolactone plus oxybrasion versus gluconolactone plus microneedling. The effects on skin parameters |
title_short | Split‐face evaluation: Gluconolactone plus oxybrasion versus gluconolactone plus microneedling. The effects on skin parameters |
title_sort | split‐face evaluation: gluconolactone plus oxybrasion versus gluconolactone plus microneedling. the effects on skin parameters |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10209840/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37357656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.13353 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jarzabekperzsylwia splitfaceevaluationgluconolactoneplusoxybrasionversusgluconolactoneplusmicroneedlingtheeffectsonskinparameters AT dziedzicmarta splitfaceevaluationgluconolactoneplusoxybrasionversusgluconolactoneplusmicroneedlingtheeffectsonskinparameters AT kołodziejczakanna splitfaceevaluationgluconolactoneplusoxybrasionversusgluconolactoneplusmicroneedlingtheeffectsonskinparameters AT rotsztejnhelena splitfaceevaluationgluconolactoneplusoxybrasionversusgluconolactoneplusmicroneedlingtheeffectsonskinparameters |