Cargando…

Split‐face evaluation: Gluconolactone plus oxybrasion versus gluconolactone plus microneedling. The effects on skin parameters

BACKGROUND: The application of polyhydroxy acids and alpha‐hydroxy acids to the skin is often used in cosmetology. To enhance the effect of gluconolactone chemical peeling, a combined method including water‐oxygen oxybrasion or microneedle mesotherapy can be used. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate skin parame...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jarząbek‐Perz, Sylwia, Dziedzic, Marta, Kołodziejczak, Anna, Rotsztejn, Helena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10209840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37357656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.13353
_version_ 1785046962115969024
author Jarząbek‐Perz, Sylwia
Dziedzic, Marta
Kołodziejczak, Anna
Rotsztejn, Helena
author_facet Jarząbek‐Perz, Sylwia
Dziedzic, Marta
Kołodziejczak, Anna
Rotsztejn, Helena
author_sort Jarząbek‐Perz, Sylwia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The application of polyhydroxy acids and alpha‐hydroxy acids to the skin is often used in cosmetology. To enhance the effect of gluconolactone chemical peeling, a combined method including water‐oxygen oxybrasion or microneedle mesotherapy can be used. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate skin parameters such as hydration, sebum, pH and TEWL after application of a 10% gluconolactone chemical peel in combination with oxybrasion and microneedling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty‐one Caucasian women participated in the study. A series of three split face treatments was carried out at 1‐week intervals. Oxybrasion was performed on the right side of the face and micro‐needle mesotherapy on the left side. A 10% gluconolactone solution was applied to the entire face. Before the first and third treatments and 2 weeks after the last treatment, skin parameters were evaluated. Photographic documentation was also made before and after the treatment series. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Evaluation of skin parameters using Courage & Khazaka 580 Multi Probe Adapter probes (Courage + Khazaka electronic GmbH, Cologne, Germany) showed an increase in hydration and a decrease in sebum, pH and TEWL for both treatments. There were no statistically significant differences between the treatments. Combining chemical peeling of gluconolactone with oxybrasion and microneedle mesotherapy is a good method to seal the hydrolipid barrier and increase skin hydration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10209840
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102098402023-08-11 Split‐face evaluation: Gluconolactone plus oxybrasion versus gluconolactone plus microneedling. The effects on skin parameters Jarząbek‐Perz, Sylwia Dziedzic, Marta Kołodziejczak, Anna Rotsztejn, Helena Skin Res Technol Original Articles BACKGROUND: The application of polyhydroxy acids and alpha‐hydroxy acids to the skin is often used in cosmetology. To enhance the effect of gluconolactone chemical peeling, a combined method including water‐oxygen oxybrasion or microneedle mesotherapy can be used. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate skin parameters such as hydration, sebum, pH and TEWL after application of a 10% gluconolactone chemical peel in combination with oxybrasion and microneedling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty‐one Caucasian women participated in the study. A series of three split face treatments was carried out at 1‐week intervals. Oxybrasion was performed on the right side of the face and micro‐needle mesotherapy on the left side. A 10% gluconolactone solution was applied to the entire face. Before the first and third treatments and 2 weeks after the last treatment, skin parameters were evaluated. Photographic documentation was also made before and after the treatment series. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Evaluation of skin parameters using Courage & Khazaka 580 Multi Probe Adapter probes (Courage + Khazaka electronic GmbH, Cologne, Germany) showed an increase in hydration and a decrease in sebum, pH and TEWL for both treatments. There were no statistically significant differences between the treatments. Combining chemical peeling of gluconolactone with oxybrasion and microneedle mesotherapy is a good method to seal the hydrolipid barrier and increase skin hydration. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10209840/ /pubmed/37357656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.13353 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Skin Research and Technology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Jarząbek‐Perz, Sylwia
Dziedzic, Marta
Kołodziejczak, Anna
Rotsztejn, Helena
Split‐face evaluation: Gluconolactone plus oxybrasion versus gluconolactone plus microneedling. The effects on skin parameters
title Split‐face evaluation: Gluconolactone plus oxybrasion versus gluconolactone plus microneedling. The effects on skin parameters
title_full Split‐face evaluation: Gluconolactone plus oxybrasion versus gluconolactone plus microneedling. The effects on skin parameters
title_fullStr Split‐face evaluation: Gluconolactone plus oxybrasion versus gluconolactone plus microneedling. The effects on skin parameters
title_full_unstemmed Split‐face evaluation: Gluconolactone plus oxybrasion versus gluconolactone plus microneedling. The effects on skin parameters
title_short Split‐face evaluation: Gluconolactone plus oxybrasion versus gluconolactone plus microneedling. The effects on skin parameters
title_sort split‐face evaluation: gluconolactone plus oxybrasion versus gluconolactone plus microneedling. the effects on skin parameters
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10209840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37357656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.13353
work_keys_str_mv AT jarzabekperzsylwia splitfaceevaluationgluconolactoneplusoxybrasionversusgluconolactoneplusmicroneedlingtheeffectsonskinparameters
AT dziedzicmarta splitfaceevaluationgluconolactoneplusoxybrasionversusgluconolactoneplusmicroneedlingtheeffectsonskinparameters
AT kołodziejczakanna splitfaceevaluationgluconolactoneplusoxybrasionversusgluconolactoneplusmicroneedlingtheeffectsonskinparameters
AT rotsztejnhelena splitfaceevaluationgluconolactoneplusoxybrasionversusgluconolactoneplusmicroneedlingtheeffectsonskinparameters