Cargando…

Diverse approaches to nature recovery are needed to meet the varied needs of people and nature

Conservation and restoration projects often fail to engage local communities during the planning and implementation stage. In addition, when considering urban boundary ecosystems, there exists a wide range of stakeholders that must be involved in the planning process to ensure social equity in land...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dunn-Capper, Rowan, Quintero-Uribe, Laura C., Pereira, Henrique M., Sandom, Christopher J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Japan 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10209942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37363315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01337-w
_version_ 1785046972868067328
author Dunn-Capper, Rowan
Quintero-Uribe, Laura C.
Pereira, Henrique M.
Sandom, Christopher J.
author_facet Dunn-Capper, Rowan
Quintero-Uribe, Laura C.
Pereira, Henrique M.
Sandom, Christopher J.
author_sort Dunn-Capper, Rowan
collection PubMed
description Conservation and restoration projects often fail to engage local communities during the planning and implementation stage. In addition, when considering urban boundary ecosystems, there exists a wide range of stakeholders that must be involved in the planning process to ensure social equity in land management outcomes. Traditional methods for assessing future landscape change scenarios have been critiqued for their inability to adequately incorporate the diverse range of stakeholder values. This paper presents a multicriteria mapping study, incorporating a novel application of the Nature Futures Framework, to assess nature recovery scenarios on Brighton and Hove’s Downland Estate—an urban boundary landscape surrounding the city of Brighton and Hove in Sussex, South East England. We focus on two key research outcomes. First, we assess the perceived performance of alternative nature recovery options across Nature Future value perspectives and between contrasting stakeholder groups. Second, by mapping stakeholder values from our multicriteria mapping study, we demonstrate that the Nature Futures Framework provides a robust framework within which to assess the diverse values stakeholders hold for land use change. We propose that utilizing the Nature Futures Framework, in combination with the multicriteria mapping interview technique, can form a valuable tool to elicit stakeholder values that may have been hidden, or underrepresented in traditional assessment methods, and to compare the perceived performance of alternative nature recovery scenarios between stakeholder groups. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11625-023-01337-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10209942
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Japan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102099422023-05-26 Diverse approaches to nature recovery are needed to meet the varied needs of people and nature Dunn-Capper, Rowan Quintero-Uribe, Laura C. Pereira, Henrique M. Sandom, Christopher J. Sustain Sci Special Feature: Original Article Conservation and restoration projects often fail to engage local communities during the planning and implementation stage. In addition, when considering urban boundary ecosystems, there exists a wide range of stakeholders that must be involved in the planning process to ensure social equity in land management outcomes. Traditional methods for assessing future landscape change scenarios have been critiqued for their inability to adequately incorporate the diverse range of stakeholder values. This paper presents a multicriteria mapping study, incorporating a novel application of the Nature Futures Framework, to assess nature recovery scenarios on Brighton and Hove’s Downland Estate—an urban boundary landscape surrounding the city of Brighton and Hove in Sussex, South East England. We focus on two key research outcomes. First, we assess the perceived performance of alternative nature recovery options across Nature Future value perspectives and between contrasting stakeholder groups. Second, by mapping stakeholder values from our multicriteria mapping study, we demonstrate that the Nature Futures Framework provides a robust framework within which to assess the diverse values stakeholders hold for land use change. We propose that utilizing the Nature Futures Framework, in combination with the multicriteria mapping interview technique, can form a valuable tool to elicit stakeholder values that may have been hidden, or underrepresented in traditional assessment methods, and to compare the perceived performance of alternative nature recovery scenarios between stakeholder groups. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11625-023-01337-w. Springer Japan 2023-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10209942/ /pubmed/37363315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01337-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Special Feature: Original Article
Dunn-Capper, Rowan
Quintero-Uribe, Laura C.
Pereira, Henrique M.
Sandom, Christopher J.
Diverse approaches to nature recovery are needed to meet the varied needs of people and nature
title Diverse approaches to nature recovery are needed to meet the varied needs of people and nature
title_full Diverse approaches to nature recovery are needed to meet the varied needs of people and nature
title_fullStr Diverse approaches to nature recovery are needed to meet the varied needs of people and nature
title_full_unstemmed Diverse approaches to nature recovery are needed to meet the varied needs of people and nature
title_short Diverse approaches to nature recovery are needed to meet the varied needs of people and nature
title_sort diverse approaches to nature recovery are needed to meet the varied needs of people and nature
topic Special Feature: Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10209942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37363315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01337-w
work_keys_str_mv AT dunncapperrowan diverseapproachestonaturerecoveryareneededtomeetthevariedneedsofpeopleandnature
AT quinterouribelaurac diverseapproachestonaturerecoveryareneededtomeetthevariedneedsofpeopleandnature
AT pereirahenriquem diverseapproachestonaturerecoveryareneededtomeetthevariedneedsofpeopleandnature
AT sandomchristopherj diverseapproachestonaturerecoveryareneededtomeetthevariedneedsofpeopleandnature