Cargando…

Utilization of Electrodeionization for Lithium Removal

[Image: see text] In this work, usage of a hybrid polymeric ion exchange resin and a polymeric ion exchange membrane in the same unit to remove Li(+) from aqueous solutions was reported. The effects of the applied potential difference to the electrodes, the flow rate of the Li-containing solution, t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Demir, Gülseren, Mert, Ayşe Nur, Arar, Özgür
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10210215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37251165
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c08095
_version_ 1785047022706884608
author Demir, Gülseren
Mert, Ayşe Nur
Arar, Özgür
author_facet Demir, Gülseren
Mert, Ayşe Nur
Arar, Özgür
author_sort Demir, Gülseren
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] In this work, usage of a hybrid polymeric ion exchange resin and a polymeric ion exchange membrane in the same unit to remove Li(+) from aqueous solutions was reported. The effects of the applied potential difference to the electrodes, the flow rate of the Li-containing solution, the presence of coexisting ions (Na(+), K(+), Ca(2+), Ba(2+), and Mg(2+)), and the influence of the electrolyte concentration in the anode and cathode chambers on Li(+) removal were investigated. At 20 V, 99% of Li(+) was removed from the Li-containing solution. In addition, a decrease in the flow rate of the Li-containing solution from 2 to 1 L/h resulted in a decrease in the removal rate from 99 to 94%. Similar results were obtained when the concentration of Na(2)SO(4) was decreased from 0.01 to 0.005 M. The selectivity test showed that the simultaneous presence of monovalent ions such as Na(+) and K(+) did not change the removal rate of Li(+). However, the presence of divalent ions, Ca(2+), Mg(2+), and Ba(2+), reduced the removal rate of Li(+). Under optimal conditions, the mass transport coefficient of Li(+) was found as 5.39 × 10(–4) m/s, and the specific energy consumption was found as 106.2 W h/g LiCl. Electrodeionization provided stable performance in terms of the removal rate and transport of Li(+) from the central compartment to the cathode compartment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10210215
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102102152023-05-26 Utilization of Electrodeionization for Lithium Removal Demir, Gülseren Mert, Ayşe Nur Arar, Özgür ACS Omega [Image: see text] In this work, usage of a hybrid polymeric ion exchange resin and a polymeric ion exchange membrane in the same unit to remove Li(+) from aqueous solutions was reported. The effects of the applied potential difference to the electrodes, the flow rate of the Li-containing solution, the presence of coexisting ions (Na(+), K(+), Ca(2+), Ba(2+), and Mg(2+)), and the influence of the electrolyte concentration in the anode and cathode chambers on Li(+) removal were investigated. At 20 V, 99% of Li(+) was removed from the Li-containing solution. In addition, a decrease in the flow rate of the Li-containing solution from 2 to 1 L/h resulted in a decrease in the removal rate from 99 to 94%. Similar results were obtained when the concentration of Na(2)SO(4) was decreased from 0.01 to 0.005 M. The selectivity test showed that the simultaneous presence of monovalent ions such as Na(+) and K(+) did not change the removal rate of Li(+). However, the presence of divalent ions, Ca(2+), Mg(2+), and Ba(2+), reduced the removal rate of Li(+). Under optimal conditions, the mass transport coefficient of Li(+) was found as 5.39 × 10(–4) m/s, and the specific energy consumption was found as 106.2 W h/g LiCl. Electrodeionization provided stable performance in terms of the removal rate and transport of Li(+) from the central compartment to the cathode compartment. American Chemical Society 2023-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10210215/ /pubmed/37251165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c08095 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Demir, Gülseren
Mert, Ayşe Nur
Arar, Özgür
Utilization of Electrodeionization for Lithium Removal
title Utilization of Electrodeionization for Lithium Removal
title_full Utilization of Electrodeionization for Lithium Removal
title_fullStr Utilization of Electrodeionization for Lithium Removal
title_full_unstemmed Utilization of Electrodeionization for Lithium Removal
title_short Utilization of Electrodeionization for Lithium Removal
title_sort utilization of electrodeionization for lithium removal
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10210215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37251165
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c08095
work_keys_str_mv AT demirgulseren utilizationofelectrodeionizationforlithiumremoval
AT mertaysenur utilizationofelectrodeionizationforlithiumremoval
AT ararozgur utilizationofelectrodeionizationforlithiumremoval