Cargando…
Utilization of Electrodeionization for Lithium Removal
[Image: see text] In this work, usage of a hybrid polymeric ion exchange resin and a polymeric ion exchange membrane in the same unit to remove Li(+) from aqueous solutions was reported. The effects of the applied potential difference to the electrodes, the flow rate of the Li-containing solution, t...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10210215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37251165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c08095 |
_version_ | 1785047022706884608 |
---|---|
author | Demir, Gülseren Mert, Ayşe Nur Arar, Özgür |
author_facet | Demir, Gülseren Mert, Ayşe Nur Arar, Özgür |
author_sort | Demir, Gülseren |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] In this work, usage of a hybrid polymeric ion exchange resin and a polymeric ion exchange membrane in the same unit to remove Li(+) from aqueous solutions was reported. The effects of the applied potential difference to the electrodes, the flow rate of the Li-containing solution, the presence of coexisting ions (Na(+), K(+), Ca(2+), Ba(2+), and Mg(2+)), and the influence of the electrolyte concentration in the anode and cathode chambers on Li(+) removal were investigated. At 20 V, 99% of Li(+) was removed from the Li-containing solution. In addition, a decrease in the flow rate of the Li-containing solution from 2 to 1 L/h resulted in a decrease in the removal rate from 99 to 94%. Similar results were obtained when the concentration of Na(2)SO(4) was decreased from 0.01 to 0.005 M. The selectivity test showed that the simultaneous presence of monovalent ions such as Na(+) and K(+) did not change the removal rate of Li(+). However, the presence of divalent ions, Ca(2+), Mg(2+), and Ba(2+), reduced the removal rate of Li(+). Under optimal conditions, the mass transport coefficient of Li(+) was found as 5.39 × 10(–4) m/s, and the specific energy consumption was found as 106.2 W h/g LiCl. Electrodeionization provided stable performance in terms of the removal rate and transport of Li(+) from the central compartment to the cathode compartment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10210215 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102102152023-05-26 Utilization of Electrodeionization for Lithium Removal Demir, Gülseren Mert, Ayşe Nur Arar, Özgür ACS Omega [Image: see text] In this work, usage of a hybrid polymeric ion exchange resin and a polymeric ion exchange membrane in the same unit to remove Li(+) from aqueous solutions was reported. The effects of the applied potential difference to the electrodes, the flow rate of the Li-containing solution, the presence of coexisting ions (Na(+), K(+), Ca(2+), Ba(2+), and Mg(2+)), and the influence of the electrolyte concentration in the anode and cathode chambers on Li(+) removal were investigated. At 20 V, 99% of Li(+) was removed from the Li-containing solution. In addition, a decrease in the flow rate of the Li-containing solution from 2 to 1 L/h resulted in a decrease in the removal rate from 99 to 94%. Similar results were obtained when the concentration of Na(2)SO(4) was decreased from 0.01 to 0.005 M. The selectivity test showed that the simultaneous presence of monovalent ions such as Na(+) and K(+) did not change the removal rate of Li(+). However, the presence of divalent ions, Ca(2+), Mg(2+), and Ba(2+), reduced the removal rate of Li(+). Under optimal conditions, the mass transport coefficient of Li(+) was found as 5.39 × 10(–4) m/s, and the specific energy consumption was found as 106.2 W h/g LiCl. Electrodeionization provided stable performance in terms of the removal rate and transport of Li(+) from the central compartment to the cathode compartment. American Chemical Society 2023-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10210215/ /pubmed/37251165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c08095 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Demir, Gülseren Mert, Ayşe Nur Arar, Özgür Utilization of Electrodeionization for Lithium Removal |
title | Utilization of Electrodeionization for Lithium Removal |
title_full | Utilization of Electrodeionization for Lithium Removal |
title_fullStr | Utilization of Electrodeionization for Lithium Removal |
title_full_unstemmed | Utilization of Electrodeionization for Lithium Removal |
title_short | Utilization of Electrodeionization for Lithium Removal |
title_sort | utilization of electrodeionization for lithium removal |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10210215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37251165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c08095 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT demirgulseren utilizationofelectrodeionizationforlithiumremoval AT mertaysenur utilizationofelectrodeionizationforlithiumremoval AT ararozgur utilizationofelectrodeionizationforlithiumremoval |