Cargando…
Brain‐oscillation-synchronized stimulation to enhance motor recovery in early subacute stroke: a randomized controlled double‐blind three‐ arm parallel‐group exploratory trial comparing personalized, non‐ personalized and sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (Acronym: BOSS-STROKE)
BACKGROUND: Stroke is a major cause of death and the most frequent cause of permanent disability in western countries. Repetitive transcranial brain stimulation (rTMS) has been used to enhance neuronal plasticity after stroke, yet with only moderate effect sizes. Here we will apply a highly innovati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10210305/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37231390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-023-03235-1 |
_version_ | 1785047042045771776 |
---|---|
author | Lieb, Anne Zrenner, Brigitte Zrenner, Christoph Kozák, Gábor Martus, Peter Grefkes, Christian Ziemann, Ulf |
author_facet | Lieb, Anne Zrenner, Brigitte Zrenner, Christoph Kozák, Gábor Martus, Peter Grefkes, Christian Ziemann, Ulf |
author_sort | Lieb, Anne |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Stroke is a major cause of death and the most frequent cause of permanent disability in western countries. Repetitive transcranial brain stimulation (rTMS) has been used to enhance neuronal plasticity after stroke, yet with only moderate effect sizes. Here we will apply a highly innovative technology that synchronizes rTMS to specific brain states identified by real-time analysis of electroencephalography. METHODS: One hundred forty-four patients with early subacute ischemic motor stroke will be included in a multicenter 3-arm parallel, randomized, double-blind, standard rTMS and sham rTMS-controlled exploratory trial in Germany. In the experimental condition, rTMS will be synchronized to the trough of the sensorimotor µ-oscillation, a high-excitability state, over ipsilesional motor cortex. In the standard rTMS control condition the identical protocol will be applied, but non-synchronized to the ongoing µ-oscillation. In the sham condition, the same µ-oscillation-synchronized protocol as in experimental condition will be applied, but with ineffective rTMS, using the sham side of an active/placebo TMS coil. The treatment will be performed over five consecutive work days (1,200 pulses per day, 6,000 pulses total). The primary endpoint will be motor performance after the last treatment session as measured by the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity. DISCUSSION: This study investigates, for the first time, the therapeutic efficacy of personalized, brain-state-dependent rTMS. We hypothesize that synchronization of rTMS with a high-excitability state will lead to significantly stronger improvement of paretic upper extremity motor function than standard or sham rTMS. Positive results may catalyze a paradigm-shift towards personalized brain-state-dependent stimulation therapies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05600374) on 10–21-2022. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10210305 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102103052023-05-26 Brain‐oscillation-synchronized stimulation to enhance motor recovery in early subacute stroke: a randomized controlled double‐blind three‐ arm parallel‐group exploratory trial comparing personalized, non‐ personalized and sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (Acronym: BOSS-STROKE) Lieb, Anne Zrenner, Brigitte Zrenner, Christoph Kozák, Gábor Martus, Peter Grefkes, Christian Ziemann, Ulf BMC Neurol Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Stroke is a major cause of death and the most frequent cause of permanent disability in western countries. Repetitive transcranial brain stimulation (rTMS) has been used to enhance neuronal plasticity after stroke, yet with only moderate effect sizes. Here we will apply a highly innovative technology that synchronizes rTMS to specific brain states identified by real-time analysis of electroencephalography. METHODS: One hundred forty-four patients with early subacute ischemic motor stroke will be included in a multicenter 3-arm parallel, randomized, double-blind, standard rTMS and sham rTMS-controlled exploratory trial in Germany. In the experimental condition, rTMS will be synchronized to the trough of the sensorimotor µ-oscillation, a high-excitability state, over ipsilesional motor cortex. In the standard rTMS control condition the identical protocol will be applied, but non-synchronized to the ongoing µ-oscillation. In the sham condition, the same µ-oscillation-synchronized protocol as in experimental condition will be applied, but with ineffective rTMS, using the sham side of an active/placebo TMS coil. The treatment will be performed over five consecutive work days (1,200 pulses per day, 6,000 pulses total). The primary endpoint will be motor performance after the last treatment session as measured by the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity. DISCUSSION: This study investigates, for the first time, the therapeutic efficacy of personalized, brain-state-dependent rTMS. We hypothesize that synchronization of rTMS with a high-excitability state will lead to significantly stronger improvement of paretic upper extremity motor function than standard or sham rTMS. Positive results may catalyze a paradigm-shift towards personalized brain-state-dependent stimulation therapies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05600374) on 10–21-2022. BioMed Central 2023-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10210305/ /pubmed/37231390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-023-03235-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Lieb, Anne Zrenner, Brigitte Zrenner, Christoph Kozák, Gábor Martus, Peter Grefkes, Christian Ziemann, Ulf Brain‐oscillation-synchronized stimulation to enhance motor recovery in early subacute stroke: a randomized controlled double‐blind three‐ arm parallel‐group exploratory trial comparing personalized, non‐ personalized and sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (Acronym: BOSS-STROKE) |
title | Brain‐oscillation-synchronized stimulation to enhance motor recovery in early subacute stroke: a randomized controlled double‐blind three‐ arm parallel‐group exploratory trial comparing personalized, non‐ personalized and sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (Acronym: BOSS-STROKE) |
title_full | Brain‐oscillation-synchronized stimulation to enhance motor recovery in early subacute stroke: a randomized controlled double‐blind three‐ arm parallel‐group exploratory trial comparing personalized, non‐ personalized and sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (Acronym: BOSS-STROKE) |
title_fullStr | Brain‐oscillation-synchronized stimulation to enhance motor recovery in early subacute stroke: a randomized controlled double‐blind three‐ arm parallel‐group exploratory trial comparing personalized, non‐ personalized and sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (Acronym: BOSS-STROKE) |
title_full_unstemmed | Brain‐oscillation-synchronized stimulation to enhance motor recovery in early subacute stroke: a randomized controlled double‐blind three‐ arm parallel‐group exploratory trial comparing personalized, non‐ personalized and sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (Acronym: BOSS-STROKE) |
title_short | Brain‐oscillation-synchronized stimulation to enhance motor recovery in early subacute stroke: a randomized controlled double‐blind three‐ arm parallel‐group exploratory trial comparing personalized, non‐ personalized and sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (Acronym: BOSS-STROKE) |
title_sort | brain‐oscillation-synchronized stimulation to enhance motor recovery in early subacute stroke: a randomized controlled double‐blind three‐ arm parallel‐group exploratory trial comparing personalized, non‐ personalized and sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (acronym: boss-stroke) |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10210305/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37231390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-023-03235-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liebanne brainoscillationsynchronizedstimulationtoenhancemotorrecoveryinearlysubacutestrokearandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindthreearmparallelgroupexploratorytrialcomparingpersonalizednonpersonalizedandshamrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationacronymbossstroke AT zrennerbrigitte brainoscillationsynchronizedstimulationtoenhancemotorrecoveryinearlysubacutestrokearandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindthreearmparallelgroupexploratorytrialcomparingpersonalizednonpersonalizedandshamrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationacronymbossstroke AT zrennerchristoph brainoscillationsynchronizedstimulationtoenhancemotorrecoveryinearlysubacutestrokearandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindthreearmparallelgroupexploratorytrialcomparingpersonalizednonpersonalizedandshamrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationacronymbossstroke AT kozakgabor brainoscillationsynchronizedstimulationtoenhancemotorrecoveryinearlysubacutestrokearandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindthreearmparallelgroupexploratorytrialcomparingpersonalizednonpersonalizedandshamrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationacronymbossstroke AT martuspeter brainoscillationsynchronizedstimulationtoenhancemotorrecoveryinearlysubacutestrokearandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindthreearmparallelgroupexploratorytrialcomparingpersonalizednonpersonalizedandshamrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationacronymbossstroke AT grefkeschristian brainoscillationsynchronizedstimulationtoenhancemotorrecoveryinearlysubacutestrokearandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindthreearmparallelgroupexploratorytrialcomparingpersonalizednonpersonalizedandshamrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationacronymbossstroke AT ziemannulf brainoscillationsynchronizedstimulationtoenhancemotorrecoveryinearlysubacutestrokearandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindthreearmparallelgroupexploratorytrialcomparingpersonalizednonpersonalizedandshamrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationacronymbossstroke |