Cargando…

Brain‐oscillation-synchronized stimulation to enhance motor recovery in early subacute stroke: a randomized controlled double‐blind three‐ arm parallel‐group exploratory trial comparing personalized, non‐ personalized and sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (Acronym: BOSS-STROKE)

BACKGROUND: Stroke is a major cause of death and the most frequent cause of permanent disability in western countries. Repetitive transcranial brain stimulation (rTMS) has been used to enhance neuronal plasticity after stroke, yet with only moderate effect sizes. Here we will apply a highly innovati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lieb, Anne, Zrenner, Brigitte, Zrenner, Christoph, Kozák, Gábor, Martus, Peter, Grefkes, Christian, Ziemann, Ulf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10210305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37231390
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-023-03235-1
_version_ 1785047042045771776
author Lieb, Anne
Zrenner, Brigitte
Zrenner, Christoph
Kozák, Gábor
Martus, Peter
Grefkes, Christian
Ziemann, Ulf
author_facet Lieb, Anne
Zrenner, Brigitte
Zrenner, Christoph
Kozák, Gábor
Martus, Peter
Grefkes, Christian
Ziemann, Ulf
author_sort Lieb, Anne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stroke is a major cause of death and the most frequent cause of permanent disability in western countries. Repetitive transcranial brain stimulation (rTMS) has been used to enhance neuronal plasticity after stroke, yet with only moderate effect sizes. Here we will apply a highly innovative technology that synchronizes rTMS to specific brain states identified by real-time analysis of electroencephalography. METHODS: One hundred forty-four patients with early subacute ischemic motor stroke will be included in a multicenter 3-arm parallel, randomized, double-blind, standard rTMS and sham rTMS-controlled exploratory trial in Germany. In the experimental condition, rTMS will be synchronized to the trough of the sensorimotor µ-oscillation, a high-excitability state, over ipsilesional motor cortex. In the standard rTMS control condition the identical protocol will be applied, but non-synchronized to the ongoing µ-oscillation. In the sham condition, the same µ-oscillation-synchronized protocol as in experimental condition will be applied, but with ineffective rTMS, using the sham side of an active/placebo TMS coil. The treatment will be performed over five consecutive work days (1,200 pulses per day, 6,000 pulses total). The primary endpoint will be motor performance after the last treatment session as measured by the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity. DISCUSSION: This study investigates, for the first time, the therapeutic efficacy of personalized, brain-state-dependent rTMS. We hypothesize that synchronization of rTMS with a high-excitability state will lead to significantly stronger improvement of paretic upper extremity motor function than standard or sham rTMS. Positive results may catalyze a paradigm-shift towards personalized brain-state-dependent stimulation therapies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05600374) on 10–21-2022.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10210305
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102103052023-05-26 Brain‐oscillation-synchronized stimulation to enhance motor recovery in early subacute stroke: a randomized controlled double‐blind three‐ arm parallel‐group exploratory trial comparing personalized, non‐ personalized and sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (Acronym: BOSS-STROKE) Lieb, Anne Zrenner, Brigitte Zrenner, Christoph Kozák, Gábor Martus, Peter Grefkes, Christian Ziemann, Ulf BMC Neurol Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Stroke is a major cause of death and the most frequent cause of permanent disability in western countries. Repetitive transcranial brain stimulation (rTMS) has been used to enhance neuronal plasticity after stroke, yet with only moderate effect sizes. Here we will apply a highly innovative technology that synchronizes rTMS to specific brain states identified by real-time analysis of electroencephalography. METHODS: One hundred forty-four patients with early subacute ischemic motor stroke will be included in a multicenter 3-arm parallel, randomized, double-blind, standard rTMS and sham rTMS-controlled exploratory trial in Germany. In the experimental condition, rTMS will be synchronized to the trough of the sensorimotor µ-oscillation, a high-excitability state, over ipsilesional motor cortex. In the standard rTMS control condition the identical protocol will be applied, but non-synchronized to the ongoing µ-oscillation. In the sham condition, the same µ-oscillation-synchronized protocol as in experimental condition will be applied, but with ineffective rTMS, using the sham side of an active/placebo TMS coil. The treatment will be performed over five consecutive work days (1,200 pulses per day, 6,000 pulses total). The primary endpoint will be motor performance after the last treatment session as measured by the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity. DISCUSSION: This study investigates, for the first time, the therapeutic efficacy of personalized, brain-state-dependent rTMS. We hypothesize that synchronization of rTMS with a high-excitability state will lead to significantly stronger improvement of paretic upper extremity motor function than standard or sham rTMS. Positive results may catalyze a paradigm-shift towards personalized brain-state-dependent stimulation therapies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05600374) on 10–21-2022. BioMed Central 2023-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10210305/ /pubmed/37231390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-023-03235-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Lieb, Anne
Zrenner, Brigitte
Zrenner, Christoph
Kozák, Gábor
Martus, Peter
Grefkes, Christian
Ziemann, Ulf
Brain‐oscillation-synchronized stimulation to enhance motor recovery in early subacute stroke: a randomized controlled double‐blind three‐ arm parallel‐group exploratory trial comparing personalized, non‐ personalized and sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (Acronym: BOSS-STROKE)
title Brain‐oscillation-synchronized stimulation to enhance motor recovery in early subacute stroke: a randomized controlled double‐blind three‐ arm parallel‐group exploratory trial comparing personalized, non‐ personalized and sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (Acronym: BOSS-STROKE)
title_full Brain‐oscillation-synchronized stimulation to enhance motor recovery in early subacute stroke: a randomized controlled double‐blind three‐ arm parallel‐group exploratory trial comparing personalized, non‐ personalized and sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (Acronym: BOSS-STROKE)
title_fullStr Brain‐oscillation-synchronized stimulation to enhance motor recovery in early subacute stroke: a randomized controlled double‐blind three‐ arm parallel‐group exploratory trial comparing personalized, non‐ personalized and sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (Acronym: BOSS-STROKE)
title_full_unstemmed Brain‐oscillation-synchronized stimulation to enhance motor recovery in early subacute stroke: a randomized controlled double‐blind three‐ arm parallel‐group exploratory trial comparing personalized, non‐ personalized and sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (Acronym: BOSS-STROKE)
title_short Brain‐oscillation-synchronized stimulation to enhance motor recovery in early subacute stroke: a randomized controlled double‐blind three‐ arm parallel‐group exploratory trial comparing personalized, non‐ personalized and sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (Acronym: BOSS-STROKE)
title_sort brain‐oscillation-synchronized stimulation to enhance motor recovery in early subacute stroke: a randomized controlled double‐blind three‐ arm parallel‐group exploratory trial comparing personalized, non‐ personalized and sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (acronym: boss-stroke)
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10210305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37231390
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-023-03235-1
work_keys_str_mv AT liebanne brainoscillationsynchronizedstimulationtoenhancemotorrecoveryinearlysubacutestrokearandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindthreearmparallelgroupexploratorytrialcomparingpersonalizednonpersonalizedandshamrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationacronymbossstroke
AT zrennerbrigitte brainoscillationsynchronizedstimulationtoenhancemotorrecoveryinearlysubacutestrokearandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindthreearmparallelgroupexploratorytrialcomparingpersonalizednonpersonalizedandshamrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationacronymbossstroke
AT zrennerchristoph brainoscillationsynchronizedstimulationtoenhancemotorrecoveryinearlysubacutestrokearandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindthreearmparallelgroupexploratorytrialcomparingpersonalizednonpersonalizedandshamrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationacronymbossstroke
AT kozakgabor brainoscillationsynchronizedstimulationtoenhancemotorrecoveryinearlysubacutestrokearandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindthreearmparallelgroupexploratorytrialcomparingpersonalizednonpersonalizedandshamrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationacronymbossstroke
AT martuspeter brainoscillationsynchronizedstimulationtoenhancemotorrecoveryinearlysubacutestrokearandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindthreearmparallelgroupexploratorytrialcomparingpersonalizednonpersonalizedandshamrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationacronymbossstroke
AT grefkeschristian brainoscillationsynchronizedstimulationtoenhancemotorrecoveryinearlysubacutestrokearandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindthreearmparallelgroupexploratorytrialcomparingpersonalizednonpersonalizedandshamrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationacronymbossstroke
AT ziemannulf brainoscillationsynchronizedstimulationtoenhancemotorrecoveryinearlysubacutestrokearandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindthreearmparallelgroupexploratorytrialcomparingpersonalizednonpersonalizedandshamrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationacronymbossstroke