Cargando…

Impact of anti-VEGF therapy on distinctive retina layers in patients with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion

BACKGROUND: To explore the impact of anti-vascular epithelial growth factor (ant-VEGF) on the thickness of each retinal layer in patients with macular edema (ME) secondary to the branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with ME secondary to monocular...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Hui, Wang, Chanjuan, Zhang, Shaochi, Liu, Jun, Bi, Xiaojun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10210465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37231357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-02981-7
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: To explore the impact of anti-vascular epithelial growth factor (ant-VEGF) on the thickness of each retinal layer in patients with macular edema (ME) secondary to the branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with ME secondary to monocular BRVO who received anti-VEGF therapy in Ningxia Eye Hospital between January-December 2020. RESULTS: Forty-three patients (25 males) were included, with 31 showed > 25% reduction in central retinal thickness (CRT) after anti-VEGF therapy (response group), and the others showed a ≤25% reduction in CRT (no-response group). The response group showed significantly smaller mean changes in the ganglion cell layer (GCL) (after 2 months) and inner plexiform layer (IPL) (after 1, 2, and 3 months) and significantly greater mean changes in the inner nuclear layer (INL) (after 2 and 3 months), outer plexiform layer (OPL) (after 3 months), outer nuclear layer (ONL) (after 2 and 3 months), and CRT (after 1 and 2 months) (all P < 0.05) as compared to the no-response group. The mean change in the thickness of each retinal layer IPL (P = 0.006) between the two groups was significantly different after controlling for a time and with a significant time trend (P < 0.001). Additionally, patients in the response group were more likely to have an improvement in IPL (43.68 ± 6.01 at 1 month and 41.52 ± 5.45 at 2 months vs. 39.9 ± 6.86 at baseline) after anti-VEGF therapy, while those in no response group might show improvement in GCL (45.75 ± 8.24 at 1 month, 40.00 ± 8.92 at 2 months, and 38.83 ± 9.93 at 3 months vs. 49.67 ± 6.83 at baseline). CONCLUSIONS: Anti-VEGF therapy might help restore the retinal structure and function in patients with ME secondary to BRVO, and those who have a response after anti-VEGF therapy are more likely to improve IPL, while those having no response might show improvement in GCL.