Cargando…

Australian teachers’ views on how primary science education can be improved

Teachers are crucial to bridging the theory-praxis divide in science education by utilising evidence-based teaching practices to improve outcomes for their learners. However, the perspectives of primary teachers have seldom been considered beyond the confines of specific professional development pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deehan, James, MacDonald, Amy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10211279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37359308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13384-023-00638-4
_version_ 1785047251347832832
author Deehan, James
MacDonald, Amy
author_facet Deehan, James
MacDonald, Amy
author_sort Deehan, James
collection PubMed
description Teachers are crucial to bridging the theory-praxis divide in science education by utilising evidence-based teaching practices to improve outcomes for their learners. However, the perspectives of primary teachers have seldom been considered beyond the confines of specific professional development programs. This paper aims to explore Australian primary teachers’ beliefs about how primary science education could be improved. A sample of 165 primary educators responded to an open-ended digital survey prompt. The results showed that teachers viewed themselves and their colleagues as central to the improvement of primary science education as evidenced by the most prominent themes of Professional Development (47.27%), Funding-Resources (37.58%), Classroom Practice (21.82%) and Personal-Teacher Improvement (21.21%). Curiously, university did not feature strongly, suggesting the participants may hold neutral views regarding the impact of universities on primary science education. The findings should serve as a catalyst for future research and engagement with primary teachers. Universities could expand their roles in building relationships with and providing accessible professional development to a group of primary teachers who, quite rightly, view themselves as key to improving primary science education.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10211279
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102112792023-05-26 Australian teachers’ views on how primary science education can be improved Deehan, James MacDonald, Amy Aust Educ Res Article Teachers are crucial to bridging the theory-praxis divide in science education by utilising evidence-based teaching practices to improve outcomes for their learners. However, the perspectives of primary teachers have seldom been considered beyond the confines of specific professional development programs. This paper aims to explore Australian primary teachers’ beliefs about how primary science education could be improved. A sample of 165 primary educators responded to an open-ended digital survey prompt. The results showed that teachers viewed themselves and their colleagues as central to the improvement of primary science education as evidenced by the most prominent themes of Professional Development (47.27%), Funding-Resources (37.58%), Classroom Practice (21.82%) and Personal-Teacher Improvement (21.21%). Curiously, university did not feature strongly, suggesting the participants may hold neutral views regarding the impact of universities on primary science education. The findings should serve as a catalyst for future research and engagement with primary teachers. Universities could expand their roles in building relationships with and providing accessible professional development to a group of primary teachers who, quite rightly, view themselves as key to improving primary science education. Springer Netherlands 2023-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10211279/ /pubmed/37359308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13384-023-00638-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Deehan, James
MacDonald, Amy
Australian teachers’ views on how primary science education can be improved
title Australian teachers’ views on how primary science education can be improved
title_full Australian teachers’ views on how primary science education can be improved
title_fullStr Australian teachers’ views on how primary science education can be improved
title_full_unstemmed Australian teachers’ views on how primary science education can be improved
title_short Australian teachers’ views on how primary science education can be improved
title_sort australian teachers’ views on how primary science education can be improved
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10211279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37359308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13384-023-00638-4
work_keys_str_mv AT deehanjames australianteachersviewsonhowprimaryscienceeducationcanbeimproved
AT macdonaldamy australianteachersviewsonhowprimaryscienceeducationcanbeimproved