Cargando…

Early versus late amniotomy during induction of labor using oxytocin: A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of early amniotomy on labor duration, maternal and neonatal outcomes during induction of labor (IOL). METHODS: This was a randomized controlled trial, conducted over a period of eight months at a monocentric site. Singleton pregnancies in nulliparous and parous patien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Halouani, Ahmed, Masmoudi, Yassine, Hamdaoui, Rym, Hammami, Aymen, Triki, Amel, Ben Amor, Anissa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10212086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37228072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286037
_version_ 1785047389706387456
author Halouani, Ahmed
Masmoudi, Yassine
Hamdaoui, Rym
Hammami, Aymen
Triki, Amel
Ben Amor, Anissa
author_facet Halouani, Ahmed
Masmoudi, Yassine
Hamdaoui, Rym
Hammami, Aymen
Triki, Amel
Ben Amor, Anissa
author_sort Halouani, Ahmed
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of early amniotomy on labor duration, maternal and neonatal outcomes during induction of labor (IOL). METHODS: This was a randomized controlled trial, conducted over a period of eight months at a monocentric site. Singleton pregnancies in nulliparous and parous patients with cephalic presentation and Bishop score ≥ 6 were enrolled in the study. One hundred participants were randomized into two groups: early amniotomy (initiating IOL with amniotomy followed by oxytocin) versus late amniotomy (initiating IOL with oxytocin followed by amniotomy 4 hours later). The primary endpoint was the time to active phase (cervical dilation ≥ 5 cm) during IOL. Secondary outcomes were time to vaginal delivery, mode of delivery, and maternal and fetal outcomes. RESULTS: Early amniotomy reduced time to active phase by 2 hours and 46 minutes compared to the late amniotomy group (3 h 42 min vs. 6 h 28 min; p<0.0001). It also reduced time to vaginal delivery by 2 hours and 52 minutes (5 h 17 min vs. 8 h 9 min; p = 0.0003). The rate of cesarean section (CS) for failed IOL was significantly lower in the early amniotomy group (31.2% vs. 70.0%; p = 0.02), without any significant difference in the overall rate of cesarean section between the two groups (32.0% vs. 40.8%; p = 0.36). There was no significant difference in maternal or fetal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Early amniotomy in IOL significantly shortens the time to active phase as well as the overall duration of labor without compromising maternal and neonatal safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10212086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102120862023-05-26 Early versus late amniotomy during induction of labor using oxytocin: A randomized controlled trial Halouani, Ahmed Masmoudi, Yassine Hamdaoui, Rym Hammami, Aymen Triki, Amel Ben Amor, Anissa PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of early amniotomy on labor duration, maternal and neonatal outcomes during induction of labor (IOL). METHODS: This was a randomized controlled trial, conducted over a period of eight months at a monocentric site. Singleton pregnancies in nulliparous and parous patients with cephalic presentation and Bishop score ≥ 6 were enrolled in the study. One hundred participants were randomized into two groups: early amniotomy (initiating IOL with amniotomy followed by oxytocin) versus late amniotomy (initiating IOL with oxytocin followed by amniotomy 4 hours later). The primary endpoint was the time to active phase (cervical dilation ≥ 5 cm) during IOL. Secondary outcomes were time to vaginal delivery, mode of delivery, and maternal and fetal outcomes. RESULTS: Early amniotomy reduced time to active phase by 2 hours and 46 minutes compared to the late amniotomy group (3 h 42 min vs. 6 h 28 min; p<0.0001). It also reduced time to vaginal delivery by 2 hours and 52 minutes (5 h 17 min vs. 8 h 9 min; p = 0.0003). The rate of cesarean section (CS) for failed IOL was significantly lower in the early amniotomy group (31.2% vs. 70.0%; p = 0.02), without any significant difference in the overall rate of cesarean section between the two groups (32.0% vs. 40.8%; p = 0.36). There was no significant difference in maternal or fetal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Early amniotomy in IOL significantly shortens the time to active phase as well as the overall duration of labor without compromising maternal and neonatal safety. Public Library of Science 2023-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10212086/ /pubmed/37228072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286037 Text en © 2023 Halouani et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Halouani, Ahmed
Masmoudi, Yassine
Hamdaoui, Rym
Hammami, Aymen
Triki, Amel
Ben Amor, Anissa
Early versus late amniotomy during induction of labor using oxytocin: A randomized controlled trial
title Early versus late amniotomy during induction of labor using oxytocin: A randomized controlled trial
title_full Early versus late amniotomy during induction of labor using oxytocin: A randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Early versus late amniotomy during induction of labor using oxytocin: A randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Early versus late amniotomy during induction of labor using oxytocin: A randomized controlled trial
title_short Early versus late amniotomy during induction of labor using oxytocin: A randomized controlled trial
title_sort early versus late amniotomy during induction of labor using oxytocin: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10212086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37228072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286037
work_keys_str_mv AT halouaniahmed earlyversuslateamniotomyduringinductionoflaborusingoxytocinarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT masmoudiyassine earlyversuslateamniotomyduringinductionoflaborusingoxytocinarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hamdaouirym earlyversuslateamniotomyduringinductionoflaborusingoxytocinarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hammamiaymen earlyversuslateamniotomyduringinductionoflaborusingoxytocinarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT trikiamel earlyversuslateamniotomyduringinductionoflaborusingoxytocinarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT benamoranissa earlyversuslateamniotomyduringinductionoflaborusingoxytocinarandomizedcontrolledtrial