Cargando…

Feasibility of self-organized blood sample collection in adults for study purposes in a primary care setting

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The COVID-19 pandemic situation poses new challenges for research. Ethical issues might arise if especially vulnerable individuals for severe COVID-19 course expose themselves because of participation in studies to a higher risk of infection for study purposes. How is the feasibilit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schröder, Dominik, Müller, Frank, Heesen, Gloria, Hummers, Eva, Dopfer-Jablonka, Alexandra, Vahldiek, Kai, Klawonn, Frank, Steffens, Sandra, Mikuteit, Marie, Niewolik, Jacqueline, Heinemann, Stephanie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10212115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37228048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286014
_version_ 1785047396913250304
author Schröder, Dominik
Müller, Frank
Heesen, Gloria
Hummers, Eva
Dopfer-Jablonka, Alexandra
Vahldiek, Kai
Klawonn, Frank
Steffens, Sandra
Mikuteit, Marie
Niewolik, Jacqueline
Heinemann, Stephanie
author_facet Schröder, Dominik
Müller, Frank
Heesen, Gloria
Hummers, Eva
Dopfer-Jablonka, Alexandra
Vahldiek, Kai
Klawonn, Frank
Steffens, Sandra
Mikuteit, Marie
Niewolik, Jacqueline
Heinemann, Stephanie
author_sort Schröder, Dominik
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: The COVID-19 pandemic situation poses new challenges for research. Ethical issues might arise if especially vulnerable individuals for severe COVID-19 course expose themselves because of participation in studies to a higher risk of infection for study purposes. How is the feasibility and acceptance of self-organized blood sample collections to measure anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike IgG antibodies in persons with a high risk for a severe COVID-19 disease progression? METHODS: Persons with a high risk for a severe COVID-19 disease progression (immunocompromised, oncology patients or over 80 years old) were recruited between January and September 2021 to send in blood samples (at least 500 μl) 1 month and 6 months after second COVID-19 vaccination. Participants were given the choice of drawing capillary or venous blood themselves or having blood drawn by health professionals belonging to either the study’s own research team or the personnel found in local practices or clinics. Participants were surveyed via a telephone interview in December 2021 and January 2022 about their choice of blood sampling methods and influence of blood collection choice upon study participation. RESULTS: Data from 360 participants was collected via telephone follow-up. First blood samples were collected by the participants themselves (35.8%), local practices or clinics (31.9%) and the research team (22.5%). Second blood samples were mostly collected in local practices or clinics (35.6%) followed by participants themselves (25.9%) and the research team (11.5%). Blood samples were not collected in 2.5% and 19.1% of persons during first and second blood draw, respectively. Only 2% of blood samples did not reach the laboratory or were not analyzable. About one-fourth (26%) of participants stated that they would not have participated in the study if it would have been required to travel to the university hospital to give their blood sample. CONCLUSIONS: Participants were able to self-organize blood collection, making use of several different blood sample methods. Nearly all blood samples were analyzable when self-collected and sent in by post. One-fourth of the participants would not have participated in the study if required to give their blood sample in the study location. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trial Registry, DRKS00021152.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10212115
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102121152023-05-26 Feasibility of self-organized blood sample collection in adults for study purposes in a primary care setting Schröder, Dominik Müller, Frank Heesen, Gloria Hummers, Eva Dopfer-Jablonka, Alexandra Vahldiek, Kai Klawonn, Frank Steffens, Sandra Mikuteit, Marie Niewolik, Jacqueline Heinemann, Stephanie PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: The COVID-19 pandemic situation poses new challenges for research. Ethical issues might arise if especially vulnerable individuals for severe COVID-19 course expose themselves because of participation in studies to a higher risk of infection for study purposes. How is the feasibility and acceptance of self-organized blood sample collections to measure anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike IgG antibodies in persons with a high risk for a severe COVID-19 disease progression? METHODS: Persons with a high risk for a severe COVID-19 disease progression (immunocompromised, oncology patients or over 80 years old) were recruited between January and September 2021 to send in blood samples (at least 500 μl) 1 month and 6 months after second COVID-19 vaccination. Participants were given the choice of drawing capillary or venous blood themselves or having blood drawn by health professionals belonging to either the study’s own research team or the personnel found in local practices or clinics. Participants were surveyed via a telephone interview in December 2021 and January 2022 about their choice of blood sampling methods and influence of blood collection choice upon study participation. RESULTS: Data from 360 participants was collected via telephone follow-up. First blood samples were collected by the participants themselves (35.8%), local practices or clinics (31.9%) and the research team (22.5%). Second blood samples were mostly collected in local practices or clinics (35.6%) followed by participants themselves (25.9%) and the research team (11.5%). Blood samples were not collected in 2.5% and 19.1% of persons during first and second blood draw, respectively. Only 2% of blood samples did not reach the laboratory or were not analyzable. About one-fourth (26%) of participants stated that they would not have participated in the study if it would have been required to travel to the university hospital to give their blood sample. CONCLUSIONS: Participants were able to self-organize blood collection, making use of several different blood sample methods. Nearly all blood samples were analyzable when self-collected and sent in by post. One-fourth of the participants would not have participated in the study if required to give their blood sample in the study location. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trial Registry, DRKS00021152. Public Library of Science 2023-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10212115/ /pubmed/37228048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286014 Text en © 2023 Schröder et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schröder, Dominik
Müller, Frank
Heesen, Gloria
Hummers, Eva
Dopfer-Jablonka, Alexandra
Vahldiek, Kai
Klawonn, Frank
Steffens, Sandra
Mikuteit, Marie
Niewolik, Jacqueline
Heinemann, Stephanie
Feasibility of self-organized blood sample collection in adults for study purposes in a primary care setting
title Feasibility of self-organized blood sample collection in adults for study purposes in a primary care setting
title_full Feasibility of self-organized blood sample collection in adults for study purposes in a primary care setting
title_fullStr Feasibility of self-organized blood sample collection in adults for study purposes in a primary care setting
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of self-organized blood sample collection in adults for study purposes in a primary care setting
title_short Feasibility of self-organized blood sample collection in adults for study purposes in a primary care setting
title_sort feasibility of self-organized blood sample collection in adults for study purposes in a primary care setting
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10212115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37228048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286014
work_keys_str_mv AT schroderdominik feasibilityofselforganizedbloodsamplecollectioninadultsforstudypurposesinaprimarycaresetting
AT mullerfrank feasibilityofselforganizedbloodsamplecollectioninadultsforstudypurposesinaprimarycaresetting
AT heesengloria feasibilityofselforganizedbloodsamplecollectioninadultsforstudypurposesinaprimarycaresetting
AT hummerseva feasibilityofselforganizedbloodsamplecollectioninadultsforstudypurposesinaprimarycaresetting
AT dopferjablonkaalexandra feasibilityofselforganizedbloodsamplecollectioninadultsforstudypurposesinaprimarycaresetting
AT vahldiekkai feasibilityofselforganizedbloodsamplecollectioninadultsforstudypurposesinaprimarycaresetting
AT klawonnfrank feasibilityofselforganizedbloodsamplecollectioninadultsforstudypurposesinaprimarycaresetting
AT steffenssandra feasibilityofselforganizedbloodsamplecollectioninadultsforstudypurposesinaprimarycaresetting
AT mikuteitmarie feasibilityofselforganizedbloodsamplecollectioninadultsforstudypurposesinaprimarycaresetting
AT niewolikjacqueline feasibilityofselforganizedbloodsamplecollectioninadultsforstudypurposesinaprimarycaresetting
AT heinemannstephanie feasibilityofselforganizedbloodsamplecollectioninadultsforstudypurposesinaprimarycaresetting