Cargando…

Human presence and infrastructure impact wildlife nocturnality differently across an assemblage of mammalian species

Wildlife species may shift towards more nocturnal behavior in areas of higher human influence, but it is unclear how consistent this shift might be. We investigated how humans impact large mammal diel activities in a heavily recreated protected area and an adjacent university-managed forest in south...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Procko, Michael, Naidoo, Robin, LeMay, Valerie, Burton, A. Cole
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10212153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37228104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286131
_version_ 1785047405731774464
author Procko, Michael
Naidoo, Robin
LeMay, Valerie
Burton, A. Cole
author_facet Procko, Michael
Naidoo, Robin
LeMay, Valerie
Burton, A. Cole
author_sort Procko, Michael
collection PubMed
description Wildlife species may shift towards more nocturnal behavior in areas of higher human influence, but it is unclear how consistent this shift might be. We investigated how humans impact large mammal diel activities in a heavily recreated protected area and an adjacent university-managed forest in southwest British Columbia, Canada. We used camera trap detections of humans and wildlife, along with data on land-use infrastructure (e.g., recreation trails and restricted-access roads), in Bayesian regression models to investigate impacts of human disturbance on wildlife nocturnality. We found moderate evidence that black bears (Ursus americanus) were more nocturnal in response to human detections (mean posterior estimate = 0.35, 90% credible interval = 0.04 to 0.65), but no other clear relationships between wildlife nocturnality and human detections. However, we found evidence that coyotes (Canis latrans) (estimates = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.46 to 1.17) were more nocturnal and snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus) (estimate = -0.87, 95% CI = -1.29 to -0.46) were less nocturnal in areas of higher trail density. We also found that coyotes (estimate = -0.87, 95% CI = -1.29 to -0.46) and cougars (Puma concolor) (estimate = -1.14, 90% CI = -2.16 to -0.12) were less nocturnal in areas of greater road density. Furthermore, coyotes, black-tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus), and snowshoe hares were moderately more nocturnal in areas near urban-wildland boundaries (estimates and 90% CIs: coyote = -0.29, -0.55 to -0.04, black-tailed deer = -0.25, -0.45 to -0.04, snowshoe hare = -0.24, -0.46 to -0.01). Our findings imply anthropogenic landscape features may influence medium to large-sized mammal diel activities more than direct human presence. While increased nocturnality may be a promising mechanism for human-wildlife coexistence, shifts in temporal activity can also have negative repercussions for wildlife, warranting further research into the causes and consequences of wildlife responses to increasingly human-dominated landscapes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10212153
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102121532023-05-26 Human presence and infrastructure impact wildlife nocturnality differently across an assemblage of mammalian species Procko, Michael Naidoo, Robin LeMay, Valerie Burton, A. Cole PLoS One Research Article Wildlife species may shift towards more nocturnal behavior in areas of higher human influence, but it is unclear how consistent this shift might be. We investigated how humans impact large mammal diel activities in a heavily recreated protected area and an adjacent university-managed forest in southwest British Columbia, Canada. We used camera trap detections of humans and wildlife, along with data on land-use infrastructure (e.g., recreation trails and restricted-access roads), in Bayesian regression models to investigate impacts of human disturbance on wildlife nocturnality. We found moderate evidence that black bears (Ursus americanus) were more nocturnal in response to human detections (mean posterior estimate = 0.35, 90% credible interval = 0.04 to 0.65), but no other clear relationships between wildlife nocturnality and human detections. However, we found evidence that coyotes (Canis latrans) (estimates = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.46 to 1.17) were more nocturnal and snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus) (estimate = -0.87, 95% CI = -1.29 to -0.46) were less nocturnal in areas of higher trail density. We also found that coyotes (estimate = -0.87, 95% CI = -1.29 to -0.46) and cougars (Puma concolor) (estimate = -1.14, 90% CI = -2.16 to -0.12) were less nocturnal in areas of greater road density. Furthermore, coyotes, black-tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus), and snowshoe hares were moderately more nocturnal in areas near urban-wildland boundaries (estimates and 90% CIs: coyote = -0.29, -0.55 to -0.04, black-tailed deer = -0.25, -0.45 to -0.04, snowshoe hare = -0.24, -0.46 to -0.01). Our findings imply anthropogenic landscape features may influence medium to large-sized mammal diel activities more than direct human presence. While increased nocturnality may be a promising mechanism for human-wildlife coexistence, shifts in temporal activity can also have negative repercussions for wildlife, warranting further research into the causes and consequences of wildlife responses to increasingly human-dominated landscapes. Public Library of Science 2023-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10212153/ /pubmed/37228104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286131 Text en © 2023 Procko et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Procko, Michael
Naidoo, Robin
LeMay, Valerie
Burton, A. Cole
Human presence and infrastructure impact wildlife nocturnality differently across an assemblage of mammalian species
title Human presence and infrastructure impact wildlife nocturnality differently across an assemblage of mammalian species
title_full Human presence and infrastructure impact wildlife nocturnality differently across an assemblage of mammalian species
title_fullStr Human presence and infrastructure impact wildlife nocturnality differently across an assemblage of mammalian species
title_full_unstemmed Human presence and infrastructure impact wildlife nocturnality differently across an assemblage of mammalian species
title_short Human presence and infrastructure impact wildlife nocturnality differently across an assemblage of mammalian species
title_sort human presence and infrastructure impact wildlife nocturnality differently across an assemblage of mammalian species
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10212153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37228104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286131
work_keys_str_mv AT prockomichael humanpresenceandinfrastructureimpactwildlifenocturnalitydifferentlyacrossanassemblageofmammalianspecies
AT naidoorobin humanpresenceandinfrastructureimpactwildlifenocturnalitydifferentlyacrossanassemblageofmammalianspecies
AT lemayvalerie humanpresenceandinfrastructureimpactwildlifenocturnalitydifferentlyacrossanassemblageofmammalianspecies
AT burtonacole humanpresenceandinfrastructureimpactwildlifenocturnalitydifferentlyacrossanassemblageofmammalianspecies