Cargando…
Human presence and infrastructure impact wildlife nocturnality differently across an assemblage of mammalian species
Wildlife species may shift towards more nocturnal behavior in areas of higher human influence, but it is unclear how consistent this shift might be. We investigated how humans impact large mammal diel activities in a heavily recreated protected area and an adjacent university-managed forest in south...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10212153/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37228104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286131 |
_version_ | 1785047405731774464 |
---|---|
author | Procko, Michael Naidoo, Robin LeMay, Valerie Burton, A. Cole |
author_facet | Procko, Michael Naidoo, Robin LeMay, Valerie Burton, A. Cole |
author_sort | Procko, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | Wildlife species may shift towards more nocturnal behavior in areas of higher human influence, but it is unclear how consistent this shift might be. We investigated how humans impact large mammal diel activities in a heavily recreated protected area and an adjacent university-managed forest in southwest British Columbia, Canada. We used camera trap detections of humans and wildlife, along with data on land-use infrastructure (e.g., recreation trails and restricted-access roads), in Bayesian regression models to investigate impacts of human disturbance on wildlife nocturnality. We found moderate evidence that black bears (Ursus americanus) were more nocturnal in response to human detections (mean posterior estimate = 0.35, 90% credible interval = 0.04 to 0.65), but no other clear relationships between wildlife nocturnality and human detections. However, we found evidence that coyotes (Canis latrans) (estimates = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.46 to 1.17) were more nocturnal and snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus) (estimate = -0.87, 95% CI = -1.29 to -0.46) were less nocturnal in areas of higher trail density. We also found that coyotes (estimate = -0.87, 95% CI = -1.29 to -0.46) and cougars (Puma concolor) (estimate = -1.14, 90% CI = -2.16 to -0.12) were less nocturnal in areas of greater road density. Furthermore, coyotes, black-tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus), and snowshoe hares were moderately more nocturnal in areas near urban-wildland boundaries (estimates and 90% CIs: coyote = -0.29, -0.55 to -0.04, black-tailed deer = -0.25, -0.45 to -0.04, snowshoe hare = -0.24, -0.46 to -0.01). Our findings imply anthropogenic landscape features may influence medium to large-sized mammal diel activities more than direct human presence. While increased nocturnality may be a promising mechanism for human-wildlife coexistence, shifts in temporal activity can also have negative repercussions for wildlife, warranting further research into the causes and consequences of wildlife responses to increasingly human-dominated landscapes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10212153 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102121532023-05-26 Human presence and infrastructure impact wildlife nocturnality differently across an assemblage of mammalian species Procko, Michael Naidoo, Robin LeMay, Valerie Burton, A. Cole PLoS One Research Article Wildlife species may shift towards more nocturnal behavior in areas of higher human influence, but it is unclear how consistent this shift might be. We investigated how humans impact large mammal diel activities in a heavily recreated protected area and an adjacent university-managed forest in southwest British Columbia, Canada. We used camera trap detections of humans and wildlife, along with data on land-use infrastructure (e.g., recreation trails and restricted-access roads), in Bayesian regression models to investigate impacts of human disturbance on wildlife nocturnality. We found moderate evidence that black bears (Ursus americanus) were more nocturnal in response to human detections (mean posterior estimate = 0.35, 90% credible interval = 0.04 to 0.65), but no other clear relationships between wildlife nocturnality and human detections. However, we found evidence that coyotes (Canis latrans) (estimates = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.46 to 1.17) were more nocturnal and snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus) (estimate = -0.87, 95% CI = -1.29 to -0.46) were less nocturnal in areas of higher trail density. We also found that coyotes (estimate = -0.87, 95% CI = -1.29 to -0.46) and cougars (Puma concolor) (estimate = -1.14, 90% CI = -2.16 to -0.12) were less nocturnal in areas of greater road density. Furthermore, coyotes, black-tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus), and snowshoe hares were moderately more nocturnal in areas near urban-wildland boundaries (estimates and 90% CIs: coyote = -0.29, -0.55 to -0.04, black-tailed deer = -0.25, -0.45 to -0.04, snowshoe hare = -0.24, -0.46 to -0.01). Our findings imply anthropogenic landscape features may influence medium to large-sized mammal diel activities more than direct human presence. While increased nocturnality may be a promising mechanism for human-wildlife coexistence, shifts in temporal activity can also have negative repercussions for wildlife, warranting further research into the causes and consequences of wildlife responses to increasingly human-dominated landscapes. Public Library of Science 2023-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10212153/ /pubmed/37228104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286131 Text en © 2023 Procko et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Procko, Michael Naidoo, Robin LeMay, Valerie Burton, A. Cole Human presence and infrastructure impact wildlife nocturnality differently across an assemblage of mammalian species |
title | Human presence and infrastructure impact wildlife nocturnality differently across an assemblage of mammalian species |
title_full | Human presence and infrastructure impact wildlife nocturnality differently across an assemblage of mammalian species |
title_fullStr | Human presence and infrastructure impact wildlife nocturnality differently across an assemblage of mammalian species |
title_full_unstemmed | Human presence and infrastructure impact wildlife nocturnality differently across an assemblage of mammalian species |
title_short | Human presence and infrastructure impact wildlife nocturnality differently across an assemblage of mammalian species |
title_sort | human presence and infrastructure impact wildlife nocturnality differently across an assemblage of mammalian species |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10212153/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37228104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286131 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT prockomichael humanpresenceandinfrastructureimpactwildlifenocturnalitydifferentlyacrossanassemblageofmammalianspecies AT naidoorobin humanpresenceandinfrastructureimpactwildlifenocturnalitydifferentlyacrossanassemblageofmammalianspecies AT lemayvalerie humanpresenceandinfrastructureimpactwildlifenocturnalitydifferentlyacrossanassemblageofmammalianspecies AT burtonacole humanpresenceandinfrastructureimpactwildlifenocturnalitydifferentlyacrossanassemblageofmammalianspecies |