Cargando…

Assessing Cannabis Use Disorder in Medical Cannabis Patients: Interim Analyses from an Observational, Longitudinal Study

BACKGROUND: To date, no studies have directly assessed potential cannabis use disorder (CUD) in medical cannabis (MC) patients pre- vs post-MC treatment. Given that MC patients use cannabis for symptom alleviation rather than intoxication, we hypothesized that MC patients would exhibit few symptoms...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sagar, Kelly A., Dahlgren, M. Kathryn, Smith, Rosemary T., Lambros, Ashley M., Gruber, Staci A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Research Society on Marijuana 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10212242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37287530
http://dx.doi.org/10.26828/cannabis/2021.02.004
_version_ 1785047424311492608
author Sagar, Kelly A.
Dahlgren, M. Kathryn
Smith, Rosemary T.
Lambros, Ashley M.
Gruber, Staci A.
author_facet Sagar, Kelly A.
Dahlgren, M. Kathryn
Smith, Rosemary T.
Lambros, Ashley M.
Gruber, Staci A.
author_sort Sagar, Kelly A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To date, no studies have directly assessed potential cannabis use disorder (CUD) in medical cannabis (MC) patients pre- vs post-MC treatment. Given that MC patients use cannabis for symptom alleviation rather than intoxication, we hypothesized that MC patients would exhibit few symptoms of CUD after initiating MC treatment. METHODS: As part of an ongoing observational, longitudinal study, 54 MC patients completed baseline assessments prior to initiating MC use and returned for at least one follow-up assessment after three, six, and/or twelve months of a self-selected MC treatment regimen; detailed MC treatment information was collected and quantified. All patients completed the Cannabis Use Disorder Identification Test - Revised (CUDIT-R) at each visit. Changes in individual items scores and total scores were assessed over time, and we examined whether total CUDIT-R scores correlated with frequency of MC use, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) exposure. Further, Cronbach's alpha analyses were conducted to provide preliminary data regarding the psychometric properties of the CUDIT-R when used among MC patients. RESULTS: Although total CUDIT-R scores increased relative to baseline, on average, ratings fell below the ‘hazardous use’ threshold at each visit. Analyses of individual items revealed that increases in total scores were primarily attributable to increases in frequency of use and not necessarily other aspects of problematic use. Total CUDIT-R scores were not associated with number of MC uses or CBD exposure, but a significant relationship was detected between increased THC exposure and higher CUDIT-R scores. Importantly however, analyses revealed that the CUDIT-R does not appear to be an appropriate tool for identifying CUD in MC patients. CONCLUSIONS: Screening tools specifically designed to assess CUD in MC patients are needed and should distinguish between frequent use and problematic use; exposure to individual cannabinoids must also be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10212242
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Research Society on Marijuana
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102122422023-06-07 Assessing Cannabis Use Disorder in Medical Cannabis Patients: Interim Analyses from an Observational, Longitudinal Study Sagar, Kelly A. Dahlgren, M. Kathryn Smith, Rosemary T. Lambros, Ashley M. Gruber, Staci A. Cannabis Research Article BACKGROUND: To date, no studies have directly assessed potential cannabis use disorder (CUD) in medical cannabis (MC) patients pre- vs post-MC treatment. Given that MC patients use cannabis for symptom alleviation rather than intoxication, we hypothesized that MC patients would exhibit few symptoms of CUD after initiating MC treatment. METHODS: As part of an ongoing observational, longitudinal study, 54 MC patients completed baseline assessments prior to initiating MC use and returned for at least one follow-up assessment after three, six, and/or twelve months of a self-selected MC treatment regimen; detailed MC treatment information was collected and quantified. All patients completed the Cannabis Use Disorder Identification Test - Revised (CUDIT-R) at each visit. Changes in individual items scores and total scores were assessed over time, and we examined whether total CUDIT-R scores correlated with frequency of MC use, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) exposure. Further, Cronbach's alpha analyses were conducted to provide preliminary data regarding the psychometric properties of the CUDIT-R when used among MC patients. RESULTS: Although total CUDIT-R scores increased relative to baseline, on average, ratings fell below the ‘hazardous use’ threshold at each visit. Analyses of individual items revealed that increases in total scores were primarily attributable to increases in frequency of use and not necessarily other aspects of problematic use. Total CUDIT-R scores were not associated with number of MC uses or CBD exposure, but a significant relationship was detected between increased THC exposure and higher CUDIT-R scores. Importantly however, analyses revealed that the CUDIT-R does not appear to be an appropriate tool for identifying CUD in MC patients. CONCLUSIONS: Screening tools specifically designed to assess CUD in MC patients are needed and should distinguish between frequent use and problematic use; exposure to individual cannabinoids must also be considered. Research Society on Marijuana 2021-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10212242/ /pubmed/37287530 http://dx.doi.org/10.26828/cannabis/2021.02.004 Text en © 2021 Authors et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction, provided the original author and source are credited, the original sources is not modified, and the source is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sagar, Kelly A.
Dahlgren, M. Kathryn
Smith, Rosemary T.
Lambros, Ashley M.
Gruber, Staci A.
Assessing Cannabis Use Disorder in Medical Cannabis Patients: Interim Analyses from an Observational, Longitudinal Study
title Assessing Cannabis Use Disorder in Medical Cannabis Patients: Interim Analyses from an Observational, Longitudinal Study
title_full Assessing Cannabis Use Disorder in Medical Cannabis Patients: Interim Analyses from an Observational, Longitudinal Study
title_fullStr Assessing Cannabis Use Disorder in Medical Cannabis Patients: Interim Analyses from an Observational, Longitudinal Study
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Cannabis Use Disorder in Medical Cannabis Patients: Interim Analyses from an Observational, Longitudinal Study
title_short Assessing Cannabis Use Disorder in Medical Cannabis Patients: Interim Analyses from an Observational, Longitudinal Study
title_sort assessing cannabis use disorder in medical cannabis patients: interim analyses from an observational, longitudinal study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10212242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37287530
http://dx.doi.org/10.26828/cannabis/2021.02.004
work_keys_str_mv AT sagarkellya assessingcannabisusedisorderinmedicalcannabispatientsinterimanalysesfromanobservationallongitudinalstudy
AT dahlgrenmkathryn assessingcannabisusedisorderinmedicalcannabispatientsinterimanalysesfromanobservationallongitudinalstudy
AT smithrosemaryt assessingcannabisusedisorderinmedicalcannabispatientsinterimanalysesfromanobservationallongitudinalstudy
AT lambrosashleym assessingcannabisusedisorderinmedicalcannabispatientsinterimanalysesfromanobservationallongitudinalstudy
AT gruberstacia assessingcannabisusedisorderinmedicalcannabispatientsinterimanalysesfromanobservationallongitudinalstudy