Cargando…

Comparison of Blood Loss with the Use of Intravenous and Intraarticular Tranexamic Acid Versus Isolated Intraarticular in Primary Knee Arthroplasty

Objective  The objective of this work is to compare blood loss during primary knee arthroplasty with the use of intravenous and intraarticular (IV + IA) tranexamic acid versus intraarticular (IA) tranexamic acid alone. Methods  This is a randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Patients with indicat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Resch, Elemar da Silva, Lemos, Leandro Silvestro, Santos, José Salvador Pantoja dos, Pozzi, João Fernando Argento, Konkevicz, Ewerton Renato
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10212634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37252309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1757958
_version_ 1785047460917280768
author Resch, Elemar da Silva
Lemos, Leandro Silvestro
Santos, José Salvador Pantoja dos
Pozzi, João Fernando Argento
Konkevicz, Ewerton Renato
author_facet Resch, Elemar da Silva
Lemos, Leandro Silvestro
Santos, José Salvador Pantoja dos
Pozzi, João Fernando Argento
Konkevicz, Ewerton Renato
author_sort Resch, Elemar da Silva
collection PubMed
description Objective  The objective of this work is to compare blood loss during primary knee arthroplasty with the use of intravenous and intraarticular (IV + IA) tranexamic acid versus intraarticular (IA) tranexamic acid alone. Methods  This is a randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Patients with indication for primary total knee arthroplasty were recruited in a specialized clinic, where they were operated by the same surgeon, always using the same surgical technique. Thirty patients were allocated in the IV + IA tranexamic acid group and 30 patients in the IA tranexamic acid group, according to randomization. Blood loss was compared through hemoglobin, hematocrit, drain volume, and blood loss estimation (Gross and Nadler calculus). Results  After collection, data from 40 patients were analyzed, 22 in the IA group and 18 in the IV + IA group. There were 20 losses due to collection error. Between groups IA and IV + IA, there were no significant differences in 24 hours between hemoglobin levels (10.56 vs. 10.65 g/dL; F (1.39 ) = 0.63, p  = 0.429), erythrocyte (3.63 vs. 3.73 million/mm (3) ; F (1.39 ) = 0.90, p  = 0.346); hematocrit (32.14 vs. 32.60%; F (1.39 ) = 1.39, p  = 0.240); drainage volume (197.0 vs. 173.6 mL; F (1.39)  = 3.38 p  = 0.069); and estimated blood loss (1,002.5 vs. 980.1; F (1.39 ) = 0.09, p  = 0.770). The same occurred in comparisons conducted after 48 hours postoperatively. Time was a significant factor for the change of all outcome variables. However, the treatment did not modify the effect of time on these outcomes. No individual presented any thromboembolic event during the work period. Conclusions  The use of IV + IA tranexamic acid showed no advantage in reducing blood loss when compared to the use of IA tranexamic acid alone in primary knee arthroplasties. This technique proved to be safe, since no thromboembolic event occurred during the development of the work.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10212634
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102126342023-05-26 Comparison of Blood Loss with the Use of Intravenous and Intraarticular Tranexamic Acid Versus Isolated Intraarticular in Primary Knee Arthroplasty Resch, Elemar da Silva Lemos, Leandro Silvestro Santos, José Salvador Pantoja dos Pozzi, João Fernando Argento Konkevicz, Ewerton Renato Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) Objective  The objective of this work is to compare blood loss during primary knee arthroplasty with the use of intravenous and intraarticular (IV + IA) tranexamic acid versus intraarticular (IA) tranexamic acid alone. Methods  This is a randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Patients with indication for primary total knee arthroplasty were recruited in a specialized clinic, where they were operated by the same surgeon, always using the same surgical technique. Thirty patients were allocated in the IV + IA tranexamic acid group and 30 patients in the IA tranexamic acid group, according to randomization. Blood loss was compared through hemoglobin, hematocrit, drain volume, and blood loss estimation (Gross and Nadler calculus). Results  After collection, data from 40 patients were analyzed, 22 in the IA group and 18 in the IV + IA group. There were 20 losses due to collection error. Between groups IA and IV + IA, there were no significant differences in 24 hours between hemoglobin levels (10.56 vs. 10.65 g/dL; F (1.39 ) = 0.63, p  = 0.429), erythrocyte (3.63 vs. 3.73 million/mm (3) ; F (1.39 ) = 0.90, p  = 0.346); hematocrit (32.14 vs. 32.60%; F (1.39 ) = 1.39, p  = 0.240); drainage volume (197.0 vs. 173.6 mL; F (1.39)  = 3.38 p  = 0.069); and estimated blood loss (1,002.5 vs. 980.1; F (1.39 ) = 0.09, p  = 0.770). The same occurred in comparisons conducted after 48 hours postoperatively. Time was a significant factor for the change of all outcome variables. However, the treatment did not modify the effect of time on these outcomes. No individual presented any thromboembolic event during the work period. Conclusions  The use of IV + IA tranexamic acid showed no advantage in reducing blood loss when compared to the use of IA tranexamic acid alone in primary knee arthroplasties. This technique proved to be safe, since no thromboembolic event occurred during the development of the work. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2023-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10212634/ /pubmed/37252309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1757958 Text en Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Resch, Elemar da Silva
Lemos, Leandro Silvestro
Santos, José Salvador Pantoja dos
Pozzi, João Fernando Argento
Konkevicz, Ewerton Renato
Comparison of Blood Loss with the Use of Intravenous and Intraarticular Tranexamic Acid Versus Isolated Intraarticular in Primary Knee Arthroplasty
title Comparison of Blood Loss with the Use of Intravenous and Intraarticular Tranexamic Acid Versus Isolated Intraarticular in Primary Knee Arthroplasty
title_full Comparison of Blood Loss with the Use of Intravenous and Intraarticular Tranexamic Acid Versus Isolated Intraarticular in Primary Knee Arthroplasty
title_fullStr Comparison of Blood Loss with the Use of Intravenous and Intraarticular Tranexamic Acid Versus Isolated Intraarticular in Primary Knee Arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Blood Loss with the Use of Intravenous and Intraarticular Tranexamic Acid Versus Isolated Intraarticular in Primary Knee Arthroplasty
title_short Comparison of Blood Loss with the Use of Intravenous and Intraarticular Tranexamic Acid Versus Isolated Intraarticular in Primary Knee Arthroplasty
title_sort comparison of blood loss with the use of intravenous and intraarticular tranexamic acid versus isolated intraarticular in primary knee arthroplasty
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10212634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37252309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1757958
work_keys_str_mv AT reschelemardasilva comparisonofbloodlosswiththeuseofintravenousandintraarticulartranexamicacidversusisolatedintraarticularinprimarykneearthroplasty
AT lemosleandrosilvestro comparisonofbloodlosswiththeuseofintravenousandintraarticulartranexamicacidversusisolatedintraarticularinprimarykneearthroplasty
AT santosjosesalvadorpantojados comparisonofbloodlosswiththeuseofintravenousandintraarticulartranexamicacidversusisolatedintraarticularinprimarykneearthroplasty
AT pozzijoaofernandoargento comparisonofbloodlosswiththeuseofintravenousandintraarticulartranexamicacidversusisolatedintraarticularinprimarykneearthroplasty
AT konkeviczewertonrenato comparisonofbloodlosswiththeuseofintravenousandintraarticulartranexamicacidversusisolatedintraarticularinprimarykneearthroplasty