Cargando…
The effect of procedural time on dysplasia detection rate during endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus
Background Endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus (BE) with Seattle protocol biopsies is time-consuming and inadequately performed in routine practice. There is no recommended procedural time for BE surveillance. We investigated the duration of surveillance procedures with adequate tissue s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10212647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36657467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2015-8883 |
_version_ | 1785047464626094080 |
---|---|
author | Vithayathil, Mathew Modolell, Ines Ortiz-Fernandez-Sordo, Jacobo Pappas, Apostolos Januszewicz, Wladyslaw O’Donovan, Maria Bianchi, Michele White, Jonathan R. Kaye, Philip Ragunath, Krish di Pietro, Massimiliano |
author_facet | Vithayathil, Mathew Modolell, Ines Ortiz-Fernandez-Sordo, Jacobo Pappas, Apostolos Januszewicz, Wladyslaw O’Donovan, Maria Bianchi, Michele White, Jonathan R. Kaye, Philip Ragunath, Krish di Pietro, Massimiliano |
author_sort | Vithayathil, Mathew |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background Endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus (BE) with Seattle protocol biopsies is time-consuming and inadequately performed in routine practice. There is no recommended procedural time for BE surveillance. We investigated the duration of surveillance procedures with adequate tissue sampling and effect on dysplasia detection rate (DDR). Methods We performed post hoc analysis from the standard arm of a crossover randomized controlled trial recruiting patients with BE (≥C2 and/or ≥M3) and no clearly visible dysplastic lesions. After inspection with white-light imaging, targeted biopsies of subtle lesions and Seattle protocol biopsies were performed. Procedure duration and biopsy number were stratified by BE length. The effect of endoscopy-related variables on DDR was assessed by multivariable logistic regression. Results Of 142 patients recruited, 15 (10.6 %) had high grade dysplasia/intramucosal cancer and 15 (10.6 %) had low grade dysplasia. The median procedural time was 16.5 minutes (interquartile range 14.0–19.0). Endoscopy duration increased by 0.9 minutes for each additional 1 cm of BE length. Seattle protocol biopsies had higher sensitivity for dysplasia than targeted biopsies (86.7 % vs. 60.0 %; P = 0.045). Longer procedural time was associated with increased likelihood of dysplasia detection on quadrantic biopsies (odds ratio [OR] 1.10, 95 %CI 1.00–1.20, P = 0.04), and for patients with BE > 6 cm also on targeted biopsies (OR 1.21, 95 %CI 1.04–1.40; P = 0.01). Conclusions In BE patients with no clearly visible dysplastic lesions, longer procedural time was associated with increased likelihood of dysplasia detection. Adequate time slots are required to perform good-quality surveillance and maximize dysplasia detection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10212647 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102126472023-05-26 The effect of procedural time on dysplasia detection rate during endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus Vithayathil, Mathew Modolell, Ines Ortiz-Fernandez-Sordo, Jacobo Pappas, Apostolos Januszewicz, Wladyslaw O’Donovan, Maria Bianchi, Michele White, Jonathan R. Kaye, Philip Ragunath, Krish di Pietro, Massimiliano Endoscopy Background Endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus (BE) with Seattle protocol biopsies is time-consuming and inadequately performed in routine practice. There is no recommended procedural time for BE surveillance. We investigated the duration of surveillance procedures with adequate tissue sampling and effect on dysplasia detection rate (DDR). Methods We performed post hoc analysis from the standard arm of a crossover randomized controlled trial recruiting patients with BE (≥C2 and/or ≥M3) and no clearly visible dysplastic lesions. After inspection with white-light imaging, targeted biopsies of subtle lesions and Seattle protocol biopsies were performed. Procedure duration and biopsy number were stratified by BE length. The effect of endoscopy-related variables on DDR was assessed by multivariable logistic regression. Results Of 142 patients recruited, 15 (10.6 %) had high grade dysplasia/intramucosal cancer and 15 (10.6 %) had low grade dysplasia. The median procedural time was 16.5 minutes (interquartile range 14.0–19.0). Endoscopy duration increased by 0.9 minutes for each additional 1 cm of BE length. Seattle protocol biopsies had higher sensitivity for dysplasia than targeted biopsies (86.7 % vs. 60.0 %; P = 0.045). Longer procedural time was associated with increased likelihood of dysplasia detection on quadrantic biopsies (odds ratio [OR] 1.10, 95 %CI 1.00–1.20, P = 0.04), and for patients with BE > 6 cm also on targeted biopsies (OR 1.21, 95 %CI 1.04–1.40; P = 0.01). Conclusions In BE patients with no clearly visible dysplastic lesions, longer procedural time was associated with increased likelihood of dysplasia detection. Adequate time slots are required to perform good-quality surveillance and maximize dysplasia detection. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2023-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10212647/ /pubmed/36657467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2015-8883 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Vithayathil, Mathew Modolell, Ines Ortiz-Fernandez-Sordo, Jacobo Pappas, Apostolos Januszewicz, Wladyslaw O’Donovan, Maria Bianchi, Michele White, Jonathan R. Kaye, Philip Ragunath, Krish di Pietro, Massimiliano The effect of procedural time on dysplasia detection rate during endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus |
title | The effect of procedural time on dysplasia detection rate during endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus |
title_full | The effect of procedural time on dysplasia detection rate during endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus |
title_fullStr | The effect of procedural time on dysplasia detection rate during endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of procedural time on dysplasia detection rate during endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus |
title_short | The effect of procedural time on dysplasia detection rate during endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus |
title_sort | effect of procedural time on dysplasia detection rate during endoscopic surveillance of barrett’s esophagus |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10212647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36657467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2015-8883 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vithayathilmathew theeffectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus AT modolellines theeffectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus AT ortizfernandezsordojacobo theeffectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus AT pappasapostolos theeffectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus AT januszewiczwladyslaw theeffectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus AT odonovanmaria theeffectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus AT bianchimichele theeffectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus AT whitejonathanr theeffectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus AT kayephilip theeffectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus AT ragunathkrish theeffectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus AT dipietromassimiliano theeffectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus AT vithayathilmathew effectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus AT modolellines effectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus AT ortizfernandezsordojacobo effectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus AT pappasapostolos effectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus AT januszewiczwladyslaw effectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus AT odonovanmaria effectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus AT bianchimichele effectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus AT whitejonathanr effectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus AT kayephilip effectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus AT ragunathkrish effectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus AT dipietromassimiliano effectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus |