Cargando…

The effect of procedural time on dysplasia detection rate during endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus

Background  Endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus (BE) with Seattle protocol biopsies is time-consuming and inadequately performed in routine practice. There is no recommended procedural time for BE surveillance. We investigated the duration of surveillance procedures with adequate tissue s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vithayathil, Mathew, Modolell, Ines, Ortiz-Fernandez-Sordo, Jacobo, Pappas, Apostolos, Januszewicz, Wladyslaw, O’Donovan, Maria, Bianchi, Michele, White, Jonathan R., Kaye, Philip, Ragunath, Krish, di Pietro, Massimiliano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10212647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36657467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2015-8883
_version_ 1785047464626094080
author Vithayathil, Mathew
Modolell, Ines
Ortiz-Fernandez-Sordo, Jacobo
Pappas, Apostolos
Januszewicz, Wladyslaw
O’Donovan, Maria
Bianchi, Michele
White, Jonathan R.
Kaye, Philip
Ragunath, Krish
di Pietro, Massimiliano
author_facet Vithayathil, Mathew
Modolell, Ines
Ortiz-Fernandez-Sordo, Jacobo
Pappas, Apostolos
Januszewicz, Wladyslaw
O’Donovan, Maria
Bianchi, Michele
White, Jonathan R.
Kaye, Philip
Ragunath, Krish
di Pietro, Massimiliano
author_sort Vithayathil, Mathew
collection PubMed
description Background  Endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus (BE) with Seattle protocol biopsies is time-consuming and inadequately performed in routine practice. There is no recommended procedural time for BE surveillance. We investigated the duration of surveillance procedures with adequate tissue sampling and effect on dysplasia detection rate (DDR). Methods  We performed post hoc analysis from the standard arm of a crossover randomized controlled trial recruiting patients with BE (≥C2 and/or ≥M3) and no clearly visible dysplastic lesions. After inspection with white-light imaging, targeted biopsies of subtle lesions and Seattle protocol biopsies were performed. Procedure duration and biopsy number were stratified by BE length. The effect of endoscopy-related variables on DDR was assessed by multivariable logistic regression. Results  Of 142 patients recruited, 15 (10.6 %) had high grade dysplasia/intramucosal cancer and 15 (10.6 %) had low grade dysplasia. The median procedural time was 16.5 minutes (interquartile range 14.0–19.0). Endoscopy duration increased by 0.9 minutes for each additional 1 cm of BE length. Seattle protocol biopsies had higher sensitivity for dysplasia than targeted biopsies (86.7 % vs. 60.0 %; P  = 0.045). Longer procedural time was associated with increased likelihood of dysplasia detection on quadrantic biopsies (odds ratio [OR] 1.10, 95 %CI 1.00–1.20, P  = 0.04), and for patients with BE > 6 cm also on targeted biopsies (OR 1.21, 95 %CI 1.04–1.40; P  = 0.01). Conclusions  In BE patients with no clearly visible dysplastic lesions, longer procedural time was associated with increased likelihood of dysplasia detection. Adequate time slots are required to perform good-quality surveillance and maximize dysplasia detection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10212647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102126472023-05-26 The effect of procedural time on dysplasia detection rate during endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus Vithayathil, Mathew Modolell, Ines Ortiz-Fernandez-Sordo, Jacobo Pappas, Apostolos Januszewicz, Wladyslaw O’Donovan, Maria Bianchi, Michele White, Jonathan R. Kaye, Philip Ragunath, Krish di Pietro, Massimiliano Endoscopy Background  Endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus (BE) with Seattle protocol biopsies is time-consuming and inadequately performed in routine practice. There is no recommended procedural time for BE surveillance. We investigated the duration of surveillance procedures with adequate tissue sampling and effect on dysplasia detection rate (DDR). Methods  We performed post hoc analysis from the standard arm of a crossover randomized controlled trial recruiting patients with BE (≥C2 and/or ≥M3) and no clearly visible dysplastic lesions. After inspection with white-light imaging, targeted biopsies of subtle lesions and Seattle protocol biopsies were performed. Procedure duration and biopsy number were stratified by BE length. The effect of endoscopy-related variables on DDR was assessed by multivariable logistic regression. Results  Of 142 patients recruited, 15 (10.6 %) had high grade dysplasia/intramucosal cancer and 15 (10.6 %) had low grade dysplasia. The median procedural time was 16.5 minutes (interquartile range 14.0–19.0). Endoscopy duration increased by 0.9 minutes for each additional 1 cm of BE length. Seattle protocol biopsies had higher sensitivity for dysplasia than targeted biopsies (86.7 % vs. 60.0 %; P  = 0.045). Longer procedural time was associated with increased likelihood of dysplasia detection on quadrantic biopsies (odds ratio [OR] 1.10, 95 %CI 1.00–1.20, P  = 0.04), and for patients with BE > 6 cm also on targeted biopsies (OR 1.21, 95 %CI 1.04–1.40; P  = 0.01). Conclusions  In BE patients with no clearly visible dysplastic lesions, longer procedural time was associated with increased likelihood of dysplasia detection. Adequate time slots are required to perform good-quality surveillance and maximize dysplasia detection. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2023-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10212647/ /pubmed/36657467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2015-8883 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Vithayathil, Mathew
Modolell, Ines
Ortiz-Fernandez-Sordo, Jacobo
Pappas, Apostolos
Januszewicz, Wladyslaw
O’Donovan, Maria
Bianchi, Michele
White, Jonathan R.
Kaye, Philip
Ragunath, Krish
di Pietro, Massimiliano
The effect of procedural time on dysplasia detection rate during endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus
title The effect of procedural time on dysplasia detection rate during endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus
title_full The effect of procedural time on dysplasia detection rate during endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus
title_fullStr The effect of procedural time on dysplasia detection rate during endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus
title_full_unstemmed The effect of procedural time on dysplasia detection rate during endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus
title_short The effect of procedural time on dysplasia detection rate during endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus
title_sort effect of procedural time on dysplasia detection rate during endoscopic surveillance of barrett’s esophagus
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10212647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36657467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2015-8883
work_keys_str_mv AT vithayathilmathew theeffectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus
AT modolellines theeffectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus
AT ortizfernandezsordojacobo theeffectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus
AT pappasapostolos theeffectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus
AT januszewiczwladyslaw theeffectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus
AT odonovanmaria theeffectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus
AT bianchimichele theeffectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus
AT whitejonathanr theeffectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus
AT kayephilip theeffectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus
AT ragunathkrish theeffectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus
AT dipietromassimiliano theeffectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus
AT vithayathilmathew effectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus
AT modolellines effectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus
AT ortizfernandezsordojacobo effectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus
AT pappasapostolos effectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus
AT januszewiczwladyslaw effectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus
AT odonovanmaria effectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus
AT bianchimichele effectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus
AT whitejonathanr effectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus
AT kayephilip effectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus
AT ragunathkrish effectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus
AT dipietromassimiliano effectofproceduraltimeondysplasiadetectionrateduringendoscopicsurveillanceofbarrettsesophagus