Cargando…

Messung der Körpertemperatur beim Schwein: Können Infrarotthermometer eine Alternative sein?

Objective Internal body temperature is an essential parameter in evaluation an animal’s general health status. The rectal temperature as ‘gold standard’ requires restraining of the animal which may cause stress especially when not accustomed to handling procedures. Stress on the other hand should wh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koch, Felicitas, Pieper, Robert, Fischer-Tenhagen, Carola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10212648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37230143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2046-5061
_version_ 1785047464859926528
author Koch, Felicitas
Pieper, Robert
Fischer-Tenhagen, Carola
author_facet Koch, Felicitas
Pieper, Robert
Fischer-Tenhagen, Carola
author_sort Koch, Felicitas
collection PubMed
description Objective Internal body temperature is an essential parameter in evaluation an animal’s general health status. The rectal temperature as ‘gold standard’ requires restraining of the animal which may cause stress especially when not accustomed to handling procedures. Stress on the other hand should whenever possible be avoided as it negatively affects animal welfare and may increase body temperature. The present study evaluated whether measuring the body surface temperature with an infrared thermometer (IRT) may represent a stressless alternative method to rectal body temperature measurements. Material and methods Twelve male fattening pigs were included in the study. Body temperature was measured once a week for 11 weeks. Body surface temperature measurements were performed in the areas of the forehead, caudal base of the ear and anus using two infrared thermometers (IRT1 and IRT2) each. Results Throughout the study, all pigs were clinically healthy. Best repeatability was found for the rectal thermometer and IRT1 in the anus region. Homogeneity of variance was not found for the measurements of the three thermometers. Mean values of body temperature were significantly different (p<0,05) between thermometers and measurement points. Thereby, the type of thermometer and measurement point possessed a moderate to strong effect. The Bland-Altman plot shows that differences in the values of the thermometers and measurement points are within the acceptable range of variation (95% interval). However, the range of variation is too substantial for clinical assessment of the body temperature. Conclusion The repeatability of temperature data measured with IRT on the body surface of pigs is acceptable. For this procedure, restraining the animals is not necessary, therefore reducing the animal’s stress level during the clinical examination. However, the correlation to the rectal body temperature is weak to moderate. Clinical relevance In order to use IRT for health monitoring in animals, reference values for respective IRT and measurement points need to be established. In the current study no case of hyper- or hypothermia occurred. Further research is warrented to evaluate whether IRT reliably detect fever.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10212648
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102126482023-05-26 Messung der Körpertemperatur beim Schwein: Können Infrarotthermometer eine Alternative sein? Koch, Felicitas Pieper, Robert Fischer-Tenhagen, Carola Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere Objective Internal body temperature is an essential parameter in evaluation an animal’s general health status. The rectal temperature as ‘gold standard’ requires restraining of the animal which may cause stress especially when not accustomed to handling procedures. Stress on the other hand should whenever possible be avoided as it negatively affects animal welfare and may increase body temperature. The present study evaluated whether measuring the body surface temperature with an infrared thermometer (IRT) may represent a stressless alternative method to rectal body temperature measurements. Material and methods Twelve male fattening pigs were included in the study. Body temperature was measured once a week for 11 weeks. Body surface temperature measurements were performed in the areas of the forehead, caudal base of the ear and anus using two infrared thermometers (IRT1 and IRT2) each. Results Throughout the study, all pigs were clinically healthy. Best repeatability was found for the rectal thermometer and IRT1 in the anus region. Homogeneity of variance was not found for the measurements of the three thermometers. Mean values of body temperature were significantly different (p<0,05) between thermometers and measurement points. Thereby, the type of thermometer and measurement point possessed a moderate to strong effect. The Bland-Altman plot shows that differences in the values of the thermometers and measurement points are within the acceptable range of variation (95% interval). However, the range of variation is too substantial for clinical assessment of the body temperature. Conclusion The repeatability of temperature data measured with IRT on the body surface of pigs is acceptable. For this procedure, restraining the animals is not necessary, therefore reducing the animal’s stress level during the clinical examination. However, the correlation to the rectal body temperature is weak to moderate. Clinical relevance In order to use IRT for health monitoring in animals, reference values for respective IRT and measurement points need to be established. In the current study no case of hyper- or hypothermia occurred. Further research is warrented to evaluate whether IRT reliably detect fever. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2023-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10212648/ /pubmed/37230143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2046-5061 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Koch, Felicitas
Pieper, Robert
Fischer-Tenhagen, Carola
Messung der Körpertemperatur beim Schwein: Können Infrarotthermometer eine Alternative sein?
title Messung der Körpertemperatur beim Schwein: Können Infrarotthermometer eine Alternative sein?
title_full Messung der Körpertemperatur beim Schwein: Können Infrarotthermometer eine Alternative sein?
title_fullStr Messung der Körpertemperatur beim Schwein: Können Infrarotthermometer eine Alternative sein?
title_full_unstemmed Messung der Körpertemperatur beim Schwein: Können Infrarotthermometer eine Alternative sein?
title_short Messung der Körpertemperatur beim Schwein: Können Infrarotthermometer eine Alternative sein?
title_sort messung der körpertemperatur beim schwein: können infrarotthermometer eine alternative sein?
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10212648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37230143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2046-5061
work_keys_str_mv AT kochfelicitas messungderkorpertemperaturbeimschweinkonneninfrarotthermometereinealternativesein
AT pieperrobert messungderkorpertemperaturbeimschweinkonneninfrarotthermometereinealternativesein
AT fischertenhagencarola messungderkorpertemperaturbeimschweinkonneninfrarotthermometereinealternativesein