Cargando…
Learning Curve Analyses for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing with Conventional Stylet-Driven Pacing Leads
BACKGROUND: Physiological conduction system pacing has attracted attention to overcome the dyssynchrony problems of conventional right ventricular pacing (RVP). Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), which complements short combing of His bundle pacing (HBP), has emerged and has proven its efficien...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10212686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37251364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/3632257 |
_version_ | 1785047474236293120 |
---|---|
author | Yu, Ga-In Kim, Tae-Hoon Yu, Hee Tae Joung, Boyoung Pak, Hui-Nam Lee, Moon-Hyoung |
author_facet | Yu, Ga-In Kim, Tae-Hoon Yu, Hee Tae Joung, Boyoung Pak, Hui-Nam Lee, Moon-Hyoung |
author_sort | Yu, Ga-In |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Physiological conduction system pacing has attracted attention to overcome the dyssynchrony problems of conventional right ventricular pacing (RVP). Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), which complements short combing of His bundle pacing (HBP), has emerged and has proven its efficiency and safety. In addition, initial experiences of LBBAP were mainly using lumen-less pacing lead, and the feasibility of stylet-driven pacing lead (SDL) was also established. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the learning curve for LBBAP using SDL. METHODS: The study enrolled 265 patients who underwent LBBAP or RVP performed by operators without previous LBBAP experience at Yonsei University Severance Hospital in Korea between December 2020 and October 2021. LBBAP was performed using SDL with an extendable helix. The learning curve was evaluated by analyzing fluoroscopy and procedure times. And, before and after reaching the learning curve, we evaluated how much the time required for the LBBAP differed from the time required for the RVP. RESULTS: LBBAP was successful in 50 of 50 (100.0%) patients left bundle branch pacing was successful in 49 of 50 (98.0%). In 50 patients who underwent LBBAP, mean fluoroscopy and procedural times were 15.1 ± 13.5 minutes and 59.9 ± 24.8 minutes, respectively. The plateau of fluoroscopy time reached in the 25th case and the plateau of procedure time reached in the 24th case. CONCLUSION: During the initial experience with LBBAP, fluoroscopy and procedural times improved with increasing operator experience. For operators who were experienced in cardiac pacemaker implantation, the steepest part of the learning curve was over the first 24-25 cases. It is shorter than the previously reported learning curves of HBP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10212686 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102126862023-05-26 Learning Curve Analyses for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing with Conventional Stylet-Driven Pacing Leads Yu, Ga-In Kim, Tae-Hoon Yu, Hee Tae Joung, Boyoung Pak, Hui-Nam Lee, Moon-Hyoung J Interv Cardiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Physiological conduction system pacing has attracted attention to overcome the dyssynchrony problems of conventional right ventricular pacing (RVP). Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), which complements short combing of His bundle pacing (HBP), has emerged and has proven its efficiency and safety. In addition, initial experiences of LBBAP were mainly using lumen-less pacing lead, and the feasibility of stylet-driven pacing lead (SDL) was also established. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the learning curve for LBBAP using SDL. METHODS: The study enrolled 265 patients who underwent LBBAP or RVP performed by operators without previous LBBAP experience at Yonsei University Severance Hospital in Korea between December 2020 and October 2021. LBBAP was performed using SDL with an extendable helix. The learning curve was evaluated by analyzing fluoroscopy and procedure times. And, before and after reaching the learning curve, we evaluated how much the time required for the LBBAP differed from the time required for the RVP. RESULTS: LBBAP was successful in 50 of 50 (100.0%) patients left bundle branch pacing was successful in 49 of 50 (98.0%). In 50 patients who underwent LBBAP, mean fluoroscopy and procedural times were 15.1 ± 13.5 minutes and 59.9 ± 24.8 minutes, respectively. The plateau of fluoroscopy time reached in the 25th case and the plateau of procedure time reached in the 24th case. CONCLUSION: During the initial experience with LBBAP, fluoroscopy and procedural times improved with increasing operator experience. For operators who were experienced in cardiac pacemaker implantation, the steepest part of the learning curve was over the first 24-25 cases. It is shorter than the previously reported learning curves of HBP. Hindawi 2023-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10212686/ /pubmed/37251364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/3632257 Text en Copyright © 2023 Ga-In Yu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yu, Ga-In Kim, Tae-Hoon Yu, Hee Tae Joung, Boyoung Pak, Hui-Nam Lee, Moon-Hyoung Learning Curve Analyses for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing with Conventional Stylet-Driven Pacing Leads |
title | Learning Curve Analyses for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing with Conventional Stylet-Driven Pacing Leads |
title_full | Learning Curve Analyses for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing with Conventional Stylet-Driven Pacing Leads |
title_fullStr | Learning Curve Analyses for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing with Conventional Stylet-Driven Pacing Leads |
title_full_unstemmed | Learning Curve Analyses for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing with Conventional Stylet-Driven Pacing Leads |
title_short | Learning Curve Analyses for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing with Conventional Stylet-Driven Pacing Leads |
title_sort | learning curve analyses for left bundle branch area pacing with conventional stylet-driven pacing leads |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10212686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37251364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/3632257 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yugain learningcurveanalysesforleftbundlebranchareapacingwithconventionalstyletdrivenpacingleads AT kimtaehoon learningcurveanalysesforleftbundlebranchareapacingwithconventionalstyletdrivenpacingleads AT yuheetae learningcurveanalysesforleftbundlebranchareapacingwithconventionalstyletdrivenpacingleads AT joungboyoung learningcurveanalysesforleftbundlebranchareapacingwithconventionalstyletdrivenpacingleads AT pakhuinam learningcurveanalysesforleftbundlebranchareapacingwithconventionalstyletdrivenpacingleads AT leemoonhyoung learningcurveanalysesforleftbundlebranchareapacingwithconventionalstyletdrivenpacingleads |