Cargando…

The prevalence of anthropogenic nest materials differs between two distinct populations of migratory birds in Europe

A major impact of human development is the transformation of natural habitats into farming lands and the expansion of built-up areas. Also, plastic pollution is affecting wildlife on a global scale. Discarded plastic is ubiquitous and accessible for birds, which can incorporate them into the nest st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jagiello, Zuzanna, Dylewski, Łukasz, Aguirre, José I., Białas, Joanna T., Dylik, Andrzej, López-García, Alejandro, Kaługa, Ireneusz, Olszewski, Adam, Siekiera, Joachim, Tobółka, Marcin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10212808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37129807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27156-1
_version_ 1785047503386705920
author Jagiello, Zuzanna
Dylewski, Łukasz
Aguirre, José I.
Białas, Joanna T.
Dylik, Andrzej
López-García, Alejandro
Kaługa, Ireneusz
Olszewski, Adam
Siekiera, Joachim
Tobółka, Marcin
author_facet Jagiello, Zuzanna
Dylewski, Łukasz
Aguirre, José I.
Białas, Joanna T.
Dylik, Andrzej
López-García, Alejandro
Kaługa, Ireneusz
Olszewski, Adam
Siekiera, Joachim
Tobółka, Marcin
author_sort Jagiello, Zuzanna
collection PubMed
description A major impact of human development is the transformation of natural habitats into farming lands and the expansion of built-up areas. Also, plastic pollution is affecting wildlife on a global scale. Discarded plastic is ubiquitous and accessible for birds, which can incorporate them into the nest structure. Here, we describe the differences in type, prevalence, and the amount of anthropogenic nest materials between two populations of terrestrial, mainly farmland bird, the white stork Ciconia ciconia, on a broad geographical scale, from two migratory divides—eastern in Poland and western in Spain (in total 303 nests). In the two populations, we detected significant differences in the incorporation of anthropogenic nest material, as measured by the Human Footprint Index (HFI) and the Impervious Surface Areas (ISA). We found that ISA was positively related to anthropogenic nest material incorporation in the Spanish population, and HFI was positively related to anthropogenic nest material, in contrast to the Polish population, in which the relationships were not significant. Moreover, we showed that the prevalence of nests with anthropogenic nest material was two times higher in Spanish than in the Polish white stork population. This study demonstrates that the behavior of incorporation of the anthropogenic nest material differs between two distinct populations of a single bird species. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11356-023-27156-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10212808
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102128082023-05-27 The prevalence of anthropogenic nest materials differs between two distinct populations of migratory birds in Europe Jagiello, Zuzanna Dylewski, Łukasz Aguirre, José I. Białas, Joanna T. Dylik, Andrzej López-García, Alejandro Kaługa, Ireneusz Olszewski, Adam Siekiera, Joachim Tobółka, Marcin Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Short Research and Discussion Article A major impact of human development is the transformation of natural habitats into farming lands and the expansion of built-up areas. Also, plastic pollution is affecting wildlife on a global scale. Discarded plastic is ubiquitous and accessible for birds, which can incorporate them into the nest structure. Here, we describe the differences in type, prevalence, and the amount of anthropogenic nest materials between two populations of terrestrial, mainly farmland bird, the white stork Ciconia ciconia, on a broad geographical scale, from two migratory divides—eastern in Poland and western in Spain (in total 303 nests). In the two populations, we detected significant differences in the incorporation of anthropogenic nest material, as measured by the Human Footprint Index (HFI) and the Impervious Surface Areas (ISA). We found that ISA was positively related to anthropogenic nest material incorporation in the Spanish population, and HFI was positively related to anthropogenic nest material, in contrast to the Polish population, in which the relationships were not significant. Moreover, we showed that the prevalence of nests with anthropogenic nest material was two times higher in Spanish than in the Polish white stork population. This study demonstrates that the behavior of incorporation of the anthropogenic nest material differs between two distinct populations of a single bird species. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11356-023-27156-1. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-05-02 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10212808/ /pubmed/37129807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27156-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Short Research and Discussion Article
Jagiello, Zuzanna
Dylewski, Łukasz
Aguirre, José I.
Białas, Joanna T.
Dylik, Andrzej
López-García, Alejandro
Kaługa, Ireneusz
Olszewski, Adam
Siekiera, Joachim
Tobółka, Marcin
The prevalence of anthropogenic nest materials differs between two distinct populations of migratory birds in Europe
title The prevalence of anthropogenic nest materials differs between two distinct populations of migratory birds in Europe
title_full The prevalence of anthropogenic nest materials differs between two distinct populations of migratory birds in Europe
title_fullStr The prevalence of anthropogenic nest materials differs between two distinct populations of migratory birds in Europe
title_full_unstemmed The prevalence of anthropogenic nest materials differs between two distinct populations of migratory birds in Europe
title_short The prevalence of anthropogenic nest materials differs between two distinct populations of migratory birds in Europe
title_sort prevalence of anthropogenic nest materials differs between two distinct populations of migratory birds in europe
topic Short Research and Discussion Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10212808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37129807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27156-1
work_keys_str_mv AT jagiellozuzanna theprevalenceofanthropogenicnestmaterialsdiffersbetweentwodistinctpopulationsofmigratorybirdsineurope
AT dylewskiłukasz theprevalenceofanthropogenicnestmaterialsdiffersbetweentwodistinctpopulationsofmigratorybirdsineurope
AT aguirrejosei theprevalenceofanthropogenicnestmaterialsdiffersbetweentwodistinctpopulationsofmigratorybirdsineurope
AT białasjoannat theprevalenceofanthropogenicnestmaterialsdiffersbetweentwodistinctpopulationsofmigratorybirdsineurope
AT dylikandrzej theprevalenceofanthropogenicnestmaterialsdiffersbetweentwodistinctpopulationsofmigratorybirdsineurope
AT lopezgarciaalejandro theprevalenceofanthropogenicnestmaterialsdiffersbetweentwodistinctpopulationsofmigratorybirdsineurope
AT kaługaireneusz theprevalenceofanthropogenicnestmaterialsdiffersbetweentwodistinctpopulationsofmigratorybirdsineurope
AT olszewskiadam theprevalenceofanthropogenicnestmaterialsdiffersbetweentwodistinctpopulationsofmigratorybirdsineurope
AT siekierajoachim theprevalenceofanthropogenicnestmaterialsdiffersbetweentwodistinctpopulationsofmigratorybirdsineurope
AT tobołkamarcin theprevalenceofanthropogenicnestmaterialsdiffersbetweentwodistinctpopulationsofmigratorybirdsineurope
AT jagiellozuzanna prevalenceofanthropogenicnestmaterialsdiffersbetweentwodistinctpopulationsofmigratorybirdsineurope
AT dylewskiłukasz prevalenceofanthropogenicnestmaterialsdiffersbetweentwodistinctpopulationsofmigratorybirdsineurope
AT aguirrejosei prevalenceofanthropogenicnestmaterialsdiffersbetweentwodistinctpopulationsofmigratorybirdsineurope
AT białasjoannat prevalenceofanthropogenicnestmaterialsdiffersbetweentwodistinctpopulationsofmigratorybirdsineurope
AT dylikandrzej prevalenceofanthropogenicnestmaterialsdiffersbetweentwodistinctpopulationsofmigratorybirdsineurope
AT lopezgarciaalejandro prevalenceofanthropogenicnestmaterialsdiffersbetweentwodistinctpopulationsofmigratorybirdsineurope
AT kaługaireneusz prevalenceofanthropogenicnestmaterialsdiffersbetweentwodistinctpopulationsofmigratorybirdsineurope
AT olszewskiadam prevalenceofanthropogenicnestmaterialsdiffersbetweentwodistinctpopulationsofmigratorybirdsineurope
AT siekierajoachim prevalenceofanthropogenicnestmaterialsdiffersbetweentwodistinctpopulationsofmigratorybirdsineurope
AT tobołkamarcin prevalenceofanthropogenicnestmaterialsdiffersbetweentwodistinctpopulationsofmigratorybirdsineurope