Cargando…
The prevalence of anthropogenic nest materials differs between two distinct populations of migratory birds in Europe
A major impact of human development is the transformation of natural habitats into farming lands and the expansion of built-up areas. Also, plastic pollution is affecting wildlife on a global scale. Discarded plastic is ubiquitous and accessible for birds, which can incorporate them into the nest st...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10212808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37129807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27156-1 |
_version_ | 1785047503386705920 |
---|---|
author | Jagiello, Zuzanna Dylewski, Łukasz Aguirre, José I. Białas, Joanna T. Dylik, Andrzej López-García, Alejandro Kaługa, Ireneusz Olszewski, Adam Siekiera, Joachim Tobółka, Marcin |
author_facet | Jagiello, Zuzanna Dylewski, Łukasz Aguirre, José I. Białas, Joanna T. Dylik, Andrzej López-García, Alejandro Kaługa, Ireneusz Olszewski, Adam Siekiera, Joachim Tobółka, Marcin |
author_sort | Jagiello, Zuzanna |
collection | PubMed |
description | A major impact of human development is the transformation of natural habitats into farming lands and the expansion of built-up areas. Also, plastic pollution is affecting wildlife on a global scale. Discarded plastic is ubiquitous and accessible for birds, which can incorporate them into the nest structure. Here, we describe the differences in type, prevalence, and the amount of anthropogenic nest materials between two populations of terrestrial, mainly farmland bird, the white stork Ciconia ciconia, on a broad geographical scale, from two migratory divides—eastern in Poland and western in Spain (in total 303 nests). In the two populations, we detected significant differences in the incorporation of anthropogenic nest material, as measured by the Human Footprint Index (HFI) and the Impervious Surface Areas (ISA). We found that ISA was positively related to anthropogenic nest material incorporation in the Spanish population, and HFI was positively related to anthropogenic nest material, in contrast to the Polish population, in which the relationships were not significant. Moreover, we showed that the prevalence of nests with anthropogenic nest material was two times higher in Spanish than in the Polish white stork population. This study demonstrates that the behavior of incorporation of the anthropogenic nest material differs between two distinct populations of a single bird species. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11356-023-27156-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10212808 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102128082023-05-27 The prevalence of anthropogenic nest materials differs between two distinct populations of migratory birds in Europe Jagiello, Zuzanna Dylewski, Łukasz Aguirre, José I. Białas, Joanna T. Dylik, Andrzej López-García, Alejandro Kaługa, Ireneusz Olszewski, Adam Siekiera, Joachim Tobółka, Marcin Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Short Research and Discussion Article A major impact of human development is the transformation of natural habitats into farming lands and the expansion of built-up areas. Also, plastic pollution is affecting wildlife on a global scale. Discarded plastic is ubiquitous and accessible for birds, which can incorporate them into the nest structure. Here, we describe the differences in type, prevalence, and the amount of anthropogenic nest materials between two populations of terrestrial, mainly farmland bird, the white stork Ciconia ciconia, on a broad geographical scale, from two migratory divides—eastern in Poland and western in Spain (in total 303 nests). In the two populations, we detected significant differences in the incorporation of anthropogenic nest material, as measured by the Human Footprint Index (HFI) and the Impervious Surface Areas (ISA). We found that ISA was positively related to anthropogenic nest material incorporation in the Spanish population, and HFI was positively related to anthropogenic nest material, in contrast to the Polish population, in which the relationships were not significant. Moreover, we showed that the prevalence of nests with anthropogenic nest material was two times higher in Spanish than in the Polish white stork population. This study demonstrates that the behavior of incorporation of the anthropogenic nest material differs between two distinct populations of a single bird species. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11356-023-27156-1. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-05-02 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10212808/ /pubmed/37129807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27156-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Short Research and Discussion Article Jagiello, Zuzanna Dylewski, Łukasz Aguirre, José I. Białas, Joanna T. Dylik, Andrzej López-García, Alejandro Kaługa, Ireneusz Olszewski, Adam Siekiera, Joachim Tobółka, Marcin The prevalence of anthropogenic nest materials differs between two distinct populations of migratory birds in Europe |
title | The prevalence of anthropogenic nest materials differs between two distinct populations of migratory birds in Europe |
title_full | The prevalence of anthropogenic nest materials differs between two distinct populations of migratory birds in Europe |
title_fullStr | The prevalence of anthropogenic nest materials differs between two distinct populations of migratory birds in Europe |
title_full_unstemmed | The prevalence of anthropogenic nest materials differs between two distinct populations of migratory birds in Europe |
title_short | The prevalence of anthropogenic nest materials differs between two distinct populations of migratory birds in Europe |
title_sort | prevalence of anthropogenic nest materials differs between two distinct populations of migratory birds in europe |
topic | Short Research and Discussion Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10212808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37129807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27156-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jagiellozuzanna theprevalenceofanthropogenicnestmaterialsdiffersbetweentwodistinctpopulationsofmigratorybirdsineurope AT dylewskiłukasz theprevalenceofanthropogenicnestmaterialsdiffersbetweentwodistinctpopulationsofmigratorybirdsineurope AT aguirrejosei theprevalenceofanthropogenicnestmaterialsdiffersbetweentwodistinctpopulationsofmigratorybirdsineurope AT białasjoannat theprevalenceofanthropogenicnestmaterialsdiffersbetweentwodistinctpopulationsofmigratorybirdsineurope AT dylikandrzej theprevalenceofanthropogenicnestmaterialsdiffersbetweentwodistinctpopulationsofmigratorybirdsineurope AT lopezgarciaalejandro theprevalenceofanthropogenicnestmaterialsdiffersbetweentwodistinctpopulationsofmigratorybirdsineurope AT kaługaireneusz theprevalenceofanthropogenicnestmaterialsdiffersbetweentwodistinctpopulationsofmigratorybirdsineurope AT olszewskiadam theprevalenceofanthropogenicnestmaterialsdiffersbetweentwodistinctpopulationsofmigratorybirdsineurope AT siekierajoachim theprevalenceofanthropogenicnestmaterialsdiffersbetweentwodistinctpopulationsofmigratorybirdsineurope AT tobołkamarcin theprevalenceofanthropogenicnestmaterialsdiffersbetweentwodistinctpopulationsofmigratorybirdsineurope AT jagiellozuzanna prevalenceofanthropogenicnestmaterialsdiffersbetweentwodistinctpopulationsofmigratorybirdsineurope AT dylewskiłukasz prevalenceofanthropogenicnestmaterialsdiffersbetweentwodistinctpopulationsofmigratorybirdsineurope AT aguirrejosei prevalenceofanthropogenicnestmaterialsdiffersbetweentwodistinctpopulationsofmigratorybirdsineurope AT białasjoannat prevalenceofanthropogenicnestmaterialsdiffersbetweentwodistinctpopulationsofmigratorybirdsineurope AT dylikandrzej prevalenceofanthropogenicnestmaterialsdiffersbetweentwodistinctpopulationsofmigratorybirdsineurope AT lopezgarciaalejandro prevalenceofanthropogenicnestmaterialsdiffersbetweentwodistinctpopulationsofmigratorybirdsineurope AT kaługaireneusz prevalenceofanthropogenicnestmaterialsdiffersbetweentwodistinctpopulationsofmigratorybirdsineurope AT olszewskiadam prevalenceofanthropogenicnestmaterialsdiffersbetweentwodistinctpopulationsofmigratorybirdsineurope AT siekierajoachim prevalenceofanthropogenicnestmaterialsdiffersbetweentwodistinctpopulationsofmigratorybirdsineurope AT tobołkamarcin prevalenceofanthropogenicnestmaterialsdiffersbetweentwodistinctpopulationsofmigratorybirdsineurope |