Cargando…

Clinical outcome in metastatic prostate cancer after primary radiotherapy

PURPOSE: To describe a local radio-oncological treatment for patients with prostate cancer that metastasized to either the lymph nodes or distant regions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We included 133 patients with prostate cancer that displayed either distant metastases (DM) or lymph node metastases alone...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moll, Matthias, Herrmann, Harald, Zaharie, Alexandru, Goldner, Gregor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10212832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35953611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00066-022-01993-4
_version_ 1785047507551649792
author Moll, Matthias
Herrmann, Harald
Zaharie, Alexandru
Goldner, Gregor
author_facet Moll, Matthias
Herrmann, Harald
Zaharie, Alexandru
Goldner, Gregor
author_sort Moll, Matthias
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To describe a local radio-oncological treatment for patients with prostate cancer that metastasized to either the lymph nodes or distant regions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We included 133 patients with prostate cancer that displayed either distant metastases (DM) or lymph node metastases alone (NM) and were treated between 2004 and 2019. All patients underwent computed tomography and a bone scan or 18F- or prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted positron emission tomography. Patients received local external beam radiation therapy to the prostate to achieve local control (60–81.4 Gy to the prostate, and 45–50.4 Gy to pelvic lymph nodes), with either the 3D conformal (4-field box) or volumetric modulated arc therapy technique. A urologist prescribed additional therapy. RESULTS: We included 51 patients with DM and 82 patients with NM. The mean follow-up was 42 months for all patients. The groups were similar in T stage, initial prostate-specific antigen, histology, androgen deprivation therapy, age, treatment techniques, and prescribed doses, but different in lymph node inclusion and follow-up times. In the NM and DM groups, the 5‑year biochemical recurrence-free rates were 52% and 24%, respectively (p < 0.0001); the 5‑year disease-specific survival rates were 92% and 61%, respectively (p = 0.001); and the 5‑year OS rates were 77% and 48%, respectively (p = 0.01). The groups had similar acute and late gastrointestinal and genitourinary side effects, except that late genitourinary side effects occurred significantly more frequently in the NM group (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: DM was associated with significantly worse outcomes than NM. The long-term survival of patients with metastatic prostate cancer was low.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10212832
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102128322023-05-27 Clinical outcome in metastatic prostate cancer after primary radiotherapy Moll, Matthias Herrmann, Harald Zaharie, Alexandru Goldner, Gregor Strahlenther Onkol Original Article PURPOSE: To describe a local radio-oncological treatment for patients with prostate cancer that metastasized to either the lymph nodes or distant regions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We included 133 patients with prostate cancer that displayed either distant metastases (DM) or lymph node metastases alone (NM) and were treated between 2004 and 2019. All patients underwent computed tomography and a bone scan or 18F- or prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted positron emission tomography. Patients received local external beam radiation therapy to the prostate to achieve local control (60–81.4 Gy to the prostate, and 45–50.4 Gy to pelvic lymph nodes), with either the 3D conformal (4-field box) or volumetric modulated arc therapy technique. A urologist prescribed additional therapy. RESULTS: We included 51 patients with DM and 82 patients with NM. The mean follow-up was 42 months for all patients. The groups were similar in T stage, initial prostate-specific antigen, histology, androgen deprivation therapy, age, treatment techniques, and prescribed doses, but different in lymph node inclusion and follow-up times. In the NM and DM groups, the 5‑year biochemical recurrence-free rates were 52% and 24%, respectively (p < 0.0001); the 5‑year disease-specific survival rates were 92% and 61%, respectively (p = 0.001); and the 5‑year OS rates were 77% and 48%, respectively (p = 0.01). The groups had similar acute and late gastrointestinal and genitourinary side effects, except that late genitourinary side effects occurred significantly more frequently in the NM group (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: DM was associated with significantly worse outcomes than NM. The long-term survival of patients with metastatic prostate cancer was low. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-08-11 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10212832/ /pubmed/35953611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00066-022-01993-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Moll, Matthias
Herrmann, Harald
Zaharie, Alexandru
Goldner, Gregor
Clinical outcome in metastatic prostate cancer after primary radiotherapy
title Clinical outcome in metastatic prostate cancer after primary radiotherapy
title_full Clinical outcome in metastatic prostate cancer after primary radiotherapy
title_fullStr Clinical outcome in metastatic prostate cancer after primary radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Clinical outcome in metastatic prostate cancer after primary radiotherapy
title_short Clinical outcome in metastatic prostate cancer after primary radiotherapy
title_sort clinical outcome in metastatic prostate cancer after primary radiotherapy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10212832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35953611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00066-022-01993-4
work_keys_str_mv AT mollmatthias clinicaloutcomeinmetastaticprostatecancerafterprimaryradiotherapy
AT herrmannharald clinicaloutcomeinmetastaticprostatecancerafterprimaryradiotherapy
AT zahariealexandru clinicaloutcomeinmetastaticprostatecancerafterprimaryradiotherapy
AT goldnergregor clinicaloutcomeinmetastaticprostatecancerafterprimaryradiotherapy