Cargando…

Robotic stereotactic body radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: final analysis of the German HYPOSTAT trial

PURPOSE: We report results of the first German prospective multicenter single-arm phase II trial (ARO 2013-06; NCT02635256) of hypofractionated robotic stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for patients with localized prostate cancer (HYPOSTAT). METHODS: Patients eligible for the HYPOSTAT study had...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krug, David, Imhoff, Detlef, Haidenberger, Alfred, Heßler, Nicole, Schäfer, Jane, Huttenlocher, Stefan, Chatzikonstantinou, Georgios, Fürweger, Christoph, Ramm, Ulla, König, Inke R., Chun, Felix, Staehler, Michael, Rödel, Claus, Muacevic, Alexander, Vonthein, Reinhard, Dunst, Jürgen, Blanck, Oliver
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10212861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36757424
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00066-023-02044-2
_version_ 1785047510462496768
author Krug, David
Imhoff, Detlef
Haidenberger, Alfred
Heßler, Nicole
Schäfer, Jane
Huttenlocher, Stefan
Chatzikonstantinou, Georgios
Fürweger, Christoph
Ramm, Ulla
König, Inke R.
Chun, Felix
Staehler, Michael
Rödel, Claus
Muacevic, Alexander
Vonthein, Reinhard
Dunst, Jürgen
Blanck, Oliver
author_facet Krug, David
Imhoff, Detlef
Haidenberger, Alfred
Heßler, Nicole
Schäfer, Jane
Huttenlocher, Stefan
Chatzikonstantinou, Georgios
Fürweger, Christoph
Ramm, Ulla
König, Inke R.
Chun, Felix
Staehler, Michael
Rödel, Claus
Muacevic, Alexander
Vonthein, Reinhard
Dunst, Jürgen
Blanck, Oliver
author_sort Krug, David
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We report results of the first German prospective multicenter single-arm phase II trial (ARO 2013-06; NCT02635256) of hypofractionated robotic stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for patients with localized prostate cancer (HYPOSTAT). METHODS: Patients eligible for the HYPOSTAT study had localized prostate cancer (cT1‑3 cN0 cM0), Gleason score ≤ 7, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤ 15 ng/ml, prostate volume ≤ 80 cm(3), and an International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≤ 12. Initially, inclusion was limited to patients ≥ 75 years or patients 70–74 years with additional risk factors. The trial protocol was later amended to allow for enrolment of patients aged ≥ 60 years. The treatment consisted of 35 Gy delivered in 5 fractions to the prostate and for intermediate- or high-risk patients, also to the proximal seminal vesicles using the CyberKnife system (Accuray Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Primary endpoint was the rate of treatment-related gastrointestinal or genitourinary grade ≥ 2 toxicity based on the RTOG scale 12–15 months after treatment. Secondary endpoints were acute toxicity, late toxicity, urinary function, quality of life, and PSA response. RESULTS: From July 2016 through December 2018, 85 eligible patients were enrolled and received treatment, of whom 83 could be evaluated regarding the primary endpoint. Patients mostly had intermediate-risk disease with a median PSA value of 7.97 ng/ml and Gleason score of 7a and 7b in 43.5% and 25.9% of patients, respectively. At the final follow-up 12–15 months after treatment, no patient suffered from treatment-related gastrointestinal or genitourinary grade ≥ 2 toxicity. Acute toxicity was mostly mild, with three grade 3 events, and the cumulative rate of grade ≥ 2 genitourinary toxicity was 8.4% (95% CI 4.1–16.4%). There were no major changes in urinary function or quality of life. The median PSA value dropped to 1.18 ng/ml 12–15 months after treatment. There was one patient who developed distant metastases. CONCLUSION: Robotic SBRT with 35 Gy in 5 fractions was associated with a favorable short-term toxicity profile. Recruitment for the HYPOSTAT‑2 trial (ARO-2018‑4; NCT03795337), which further analyses the late toxicity of this regimen with a planned sample size of 500 patients, is ongoing. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00066-023-02044-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10212861
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102128612023-05-27 Robotic stereotactic body radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: final analysis of the German HYPOSTAT trial Krug, David Imhoff, Detlef Haidenberger, Alfred Heßler, Nicole Schäfer, Jane Huttenlocher, Stefan Chatzikonstantinou, Georgios Fürweger, Christoph Ramm, Ulla König, Inke R. Chun, Felix Staehler, Michael Rödel, Claus Muacevic, Alexander Vonthein, Reinhard Dunst, Jürgen Blanck, Oliver Strahlenther Onkol Original Article PURPOSE: We report results of the first German prospective multicenter single-arm phase II trial (ARO 2013-06; NCT02635256) of hypofractionated robotic stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for patients with localized prostate cancer (HYPOSTAT). METHODS: Patients eligible for the HYPOSTAT study had localized prostate cancer (cT1‑3 cN0 cM0), Gleason score ≤ 7, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤ 15 ng/ml, prostate volume ≤ 80 cm(3), and an International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≤ 12. Initially, inclusion was limited to patients ≥ 75 years or patients 70–74 years with additional risk factors. The trial protocol was later amended to allow for enrolment of patients aged ≥ 60 years. The treatment consisted of 35 Gy delivered in 5 fractions to the prostate and for intermediate- or high-risk patients, also to the proximal seminal vesicles using the CyberKnife system (Accuray Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Primary endpoint was the rate of treatment-related gastrointestinal or genitourinary grade ≥ 2 toxicity based on the RTOG scale 12–15 months after treatment. Secondary endpoints were acute toxicity, late toxicity, urinary function, quality of life, and PSA response. RESULTS: From July 2016 through December 2018, 85 eligible patients were enrolled and received treatment, of whom 83 could be evaluated regarding the primary endpoint. Patients mostly had intermediate-risk disease with a median PSA value of 7.97 ng/ml and Gleason score of 7a and 7b in 43.5% and 25.9% of patients, respectively. At the final follow-up 12–15 months after treatment, no patient suffered from treatment-related gastrointestinal or genitourinary grade ≥ 2 toxicity. Acute toxicity was mostly mild, with three grade 3 events, and the cumulative rate of grade ≥ 2 genitourinary toxicity was 8.4% (95% CI 4.1–16.4%). There were no major changes in urinary function or quality of life. The median PSA value dropped to 1.18 ng/ml 12–15 months after treatment. There was one patient who developed distant metastases. CONCLUSION: Robotic SBRT with 35 Gy in 5 fractions was associated with a favorable short-term toxicity profile. Recruitment for the HYPOSTAT‑2 trial (ARO-2018‑4; NCT03795337), which further analyses the late toxicity of this regimen with a planned sample size of 500 patients, is ongoing. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00066-023-02044-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-02-09 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10212861/ /pubmed/36757424 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00066-023-02044-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Krug, David
Imhoff, Detlef
Haidenberger, Alfred
Heßler, Nicole
Schäfer, Jane
Huttenlocher, Stefan
Chatzikonstantinou, Georgios
Fürweger, Christoph
Ramm, Ulla
König, Inke R.
Chun, Felix
Staehler, Michael
Rödel, Claus
Muacevic, Alexander
Vonthein, Reinhard
Dunst, Jürgen
Blanck, Oliver
Robotic stereotactic body radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: final analysis of the German HYPOSTAT trial
title Robotic stereotactic body radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: final analysis of the German HYPOSTAT trial
title_full Robotic stereotactic body radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: final analysis of the German HYPOSTAT trial
title_fullStr Robotic stereotactic body radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: final analysis of the German HYPOSTAT trial
title_full_unstemmed Robotic stereotactic body radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: final analysis of the German HYPOSTAT trial
title_short Robotic stereotactic body radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: final analysis of the German HYPOSTAT trial
title_sort robotic stereotactic body radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: final analysis of the german hypostat trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10212861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36757424
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00066-023-02044-2
work_keys_str_mv AT krugdavid roboticstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforlocalizedprostatecancerfinalanalysisofthegermanhypostattrial
AT imhoffdetlef roboticstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforlocalizedprostatecancerfinalanalysisofthegermanhypostattrial
AT haidenbergeralfred roboticstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforlocalizedprostatecancerfinalanalysisofthegermanhypostattrial
AT heßlernicole roboticstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforlocalizedprostatecancerfinalanalysisofthegermanhypostattrial
AT schaferjane roboticstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforlocalizedprostatecancerfinalanalysisofthegermanhypostattrial
AT huttenlocherstefan roboticstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforlocalizedprostatecancerfinalanalysisofthegermanhypostattrial
AT chatzikonstantinougeorgios roboticstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforlocalizedprostatecancerfinalanalysisofthegermanhypostattrial
AT furwegerchristoph roboticstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforlocalizedprostatecancerfinalanalysisofthegermanhypostattrial
AT rammulla roboticstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforlocalizedprostatecancerfinalanalysisofthegermanhypostattrial
AT koniginker roboticstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforlocalizedprostatecancerfinalanalysisofthegermanhypostattrial
AT chunfelix roboticstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforlocalizedprostatecancerfinalanalysisofthegermanhypostattrial
AT staehlermichael roboticstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforlocalizedprostatecancerfinalanalysisofthegermanhypostattrial
AT rodelclaus roboticstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforlocalizedprostatecancerfinalanalysisofthegermanhypostattrial
AT muacevicalexander roboticstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforlocalizedprostatecancerfinalanalysisofthegermanhypostattrial
AT vontheinreinhard roboticstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforlocalizedprostatecancerfinalanalysisofthegermanhypostattrial
AT dunstjurgen roboticstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforlocalizedprostatecancerfinalanalysisofthegermanhypostattrial
AT blanckoliver roboticstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforlocalizedprostatecancerfinalanalysisofthegermanhypostattrial