Cargando…

A pilot randomised trial comparing individualised physiotherapy versus shockwave therapy for proximal hamstring tendinopathy: a protocol

PURPOSE: Proximal hamstring tendinopathy (PHT) presents as localised lower buttock pain with tasks such as squatting and sitting. It is a condition that occurs at all ages and levels of sporting participation and can cause disability with sport, work, and activities of daily living. This paper detai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rich, Aidan Lindsay Fenner, Cook, Jillianne Leigh, Hahne, Andrew John, Ford, Jon Joseph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10212870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37227516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-023-00615-x
_version_ 1785047511872831488
author Rich, Aidan Lindsay Fenner
Cook, Jillianne Leigh
Hahne, Andrew John
Ford, Jon Joseph
author_facet Rich, Aidan Lindsay Fenner
Cook, Jillianne Leigh
Hahne, Andrew John
Ford, Jon Joseph
author_sort Rich, Aidan Lindsay Fenner
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Proximal hamstring tendinopathy (PHT) presents as localised lower buttock pain with tasks such as squatting and sitting. It is a condition that occurs at all ages and levels of sporting participation and can cause disability with sport, work, and activities of daily living. This paper details a pilot trial protocol for investigating the effectiveness of individualised physiotherapy compared to extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) on pain and strength in people with PHT. METHODS: The study is an assessor-blinded, pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT). One hundred participants with PHT will be recruited from the local community and sporting clubs. Participants will be randomised to receive six sessions of either individualised physiotherapy or ESWT, with both groups also receiving standardised education and advice. Primary outcomes will be global rating of change on a 7-point Likert scale, and the Victorian Institute of Sport—Hamstring (VISA-H) scale, measured at 0, 4, 12, 26 and 52 weeks. Secondary outcomes will include sitting tolerance, the modified Physical Activity Level Scale, eccentric hamstring strength, modified Tampa scale for kinesiophobia, the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire Short Form (ÖMPSQ-SF), Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) for average and worst pain, participant adherence, the Pain Catastrophizing scale, satisfaction scores, and quality of life. Data will be analysed on an intention to treat basis, with between-group effects estimated using linear mixed models for continuous data and Mann Whitney U tests for ordinal data. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot RCT will compare individualised physiotherapy versus ESWT for PHT. The trial will determine feasibility and estimated treatment effects to inform a definitive trial in the future. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial has been prospectively registered with the Australia & New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12621000846820), registered 1 July 2021, https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=373085 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40634-023-00615-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10212870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102128702023-05-27 A pilot randomised trial comparing individualised physiotherapy versus shockwave therapy for proximal hamstring tendinopathy: a protocol Rich, Aidan Lindsay Fenner Cook, Jillianne Leigh Hahne, Andrew John Ford, Jon Joseph J Exp Orthop Study Protocol PURPOSE: Proximal hamstring tendinopathy (PHT) presents as localised lower buttock pain with tasks such as squatting and sitting. It is a condition that occurs at all ages and levels of sporting participation and can cause disability with sport, work, and activities of daily living. This paper details a pilot trial protocol for investigating the effectiveness of individualised physiotherapy compared to extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) on pain and strength in people with PHT. METHODS: The study is an assessor-blinded, pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT). One hundred participants with PHT will be recruited from the local community and sporting clubs. Participants will be randomised to receive six sessions of either individualised physiotherapy or ESWT, with both groups also receiving standardised education and advice. Primary outcomes will be global rating of change on a 7-point Likert scale, and the Victorian Institute of Sport—Hamstring (VISA-H) scale, measured at 0, 4, 12, 26 and 52 weeks. Secondary outcomes will include sitting tolerance, the modified Physical Activity Level Scale, eccentric hamstring strength, modified Tampa scale for kinesiophobia, the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire Short Form (ÖMPSQ-SF), Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) for average and worst pain, participant adherence, the Pain Catastrophizing scale, satisfaction scores, and quality of life. Data will be analysed on an intention to treat basis, with between-group effects estimated using linear mixed models for continuous data and Mann Whitney U tests for ordinal data. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot RCT will compare individualised physiotherapy versus ESWT for PHT. The trial will determine feasibility and estimated treatment effects to inform a definitive trial in the future. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial has been prospectively registered with the Australia & New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12621000846820), registered 1 July 2021, https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=373085 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40634-023-00615-x. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10212870/ /pubmed/37227516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-023-00615-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Rich, Aidan Lindsay Fenner
Cook, Jillianne Leigh
Hahne, Andrew John
Ford, Jon Joseph
A pilot randomised trial comparing individualised physiotherapy versus shockwave therapy for proximal hamstring tendinopathy: a protocol
title A pilot randomised trial comparing individualised physiotherapy versus shockwave therapy for proximal hamstring tendinopathy: a protocol
title_full A pilot randomised trial comparing individualised physiotherapy versus shockwave therapy for proximal hamstring tendinopathy: a protocol
title_fullStr A pilot randomised trial comparing individualised physiotherapy versus shockwave therapy for proximal hamstring tendinopathy: a protocol
title_full_unstemmed A pilot randomised trial comparing individualised physiotherapy versus shockwave therapy for proximal hamstring tendinopathy: a protocol
title_short A pilot randomised trial comparing individualised physiotherapy versus shockwave therapy for proximal hamstring tendinopathy: a protocol
title_sort pilot randomised trial comparing individualised physiotherapy versus shockwave therapy for proximal hamstring tendinopathy: a protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10212870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37227516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-023-00615-x
work_keys_str_mv AT richaidanlindsayfenner apilotrandomisedtrialcomparingindividualisedphysiotherapyversusshockwavetherapyforproximalhamstringtendinopathyaprotocol
AT cookjillianneleigh apilotrandomisedtrialcomparingindividualisedphysiotherapyversusshockwavetherapyforproximalhamstringtendinopathyaprotocol
AT hahneandrewjohn apilotrandomisedtrialcomparingindividualisedphysiotherapyversusshockwavetherapyforproximalhamstringtendinopathyaprotocol
AT fordjonjoseph apilotrandomisedtrialcomparingindividualisedphysiotherapyversusshockwavetherapyforproximalhamstringtendinopathyaprotocol
AT richaidanlindsayfenner pilotrandomisedtrialcomparingindividualisedphysiotherapyversusshockwavetherapyforproximalhamstringtendinopathyaprotocol
AT cookjillianneleigh pilotrandomisedtrialcomparingindividualisedphysiotherapyversusshockwavetherapyforproximalhamstringtendinopathyaprotocol
AT hahneandrewjohn pilotrandomisedtrialcomparingindividualisedphysiotherapyversusshockwavetherapyforproximalhamstringtendinopathyaprotocol
AT fordjonjoseph pilotrandomisedtrialcomparingindividualisedphysiotherapyversusshockwavetherapyforproximalhamstringtendinopathyaprotocol