Cargando…
A new basic probability assignment generation and combination method for conflict data fusion in the evidence theory
Dempster–Shafer evidence theory is an effective method to deal with information fusion. However, how to deal with the fusion paradoxes while using the Dempster’s combination rule is still an open issue. To address this issue, a new basic probability assignment (BPA) generation method based on the co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10212963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37231018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35195-4 |
_version_ | 1785047526606372864 |
---|---|
author | Tang, Yongchuan Zhou, Yonghao Ren, Xiangxuan Sun, Yufei Huang, Yubo Zhou, Deyun |
author_facet | Tang, Yongchuan Zhou, Yonghao Ren, Xiangxuan Sun, Yufei Huang, Yubo Zhou, Deyun |
author_sort | Tang, Yongchuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Dempster–Shafer evidence theory is an effective method to deal with information fusion. However, how to deal with the fusion paradoxes while using the Dempster’s combination rule is still an open issue. To address this issue, a new basic probability assignment (BPA) generation method based on the cosine similarity and the belief entropy was proposed in this paper. Firstly, Mahalanobis distance was used to measure the similarity between the test sample and BPA of each focal element in the frame of discernment. Then, cosine similarity and belief entropy were used respectively to measure the reliability and uncertainty of each BPA to make adjustments and generate a standard BPA. Finally, Dempster’s combination rule was used for the fusion of new BPAs. Numerical examples were used to prove the effectiveness of the proposed method in solving the classical fusion paradoxes. Besides, the accuracy rates of the classification experiments on datasets were also calculated to verify the rationality and efficiency of the proposed method. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10212963 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102129632023-05-27 A new basic probability assignment generation and combination method for conflict data fusion in the evidence theory Tang, Yongchuan Zhou, Yonghao Ren, Xiangxuan Sun, Yufei Huang, Yubo Zhou, Deyun Sci Rep Article Dempster–Shafer evidence theory is an effective method to deal with information fusion. However, how to deal with the fusion paradoxes while using the Dempster’s combination rule is still an open issue. To address this issue, a new basic probability assignment (BPA) generation method based on the cosine similarity and the belief entropy was proposed in this paper. Firstly, Mahalanobis distance was used to measure the similarity between the test sample and BPA of each focal element in the frame of discernment. Then, cosine similarity and belief entropy were used respectively to measure the reliability and uncertainty of each BPA to make adjustments and generate a standard BPA. Finally, Dempster’s combination rule was used for the fusion of new BPAs. Numerical examples were used to prove the effectiveness of the proposed method in solving the classical fusion paradoxes. Besides, the accuracy rates of the classification experiments on datasets were also calculated to verify the rationality and efficiency of the proposed method. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10212963/ /pubmed/37231018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35195-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Tang, Yongchuan Zhou, Yonghao Ren, Xiangxuan Sun, Yufei Huang, Yubo Zhou, Deyun A new basic probability assignment generation and combination method for conflict data fusion in the evidence theory |
title | A new basic probability assignment generation and combination method for conflict data fusion in the evidence theory |
title_full | A new basic probability assignment generation and combination method for conflict data fusion in the evidence theory |
title_fullStr | A new basic probability assignment generation and combination method for conflict data fusion in the evidence theory |
title_full_unstemmed | A new basic probability assignment generation and combination method for conflict data fusion in the evidence theory |
title_short | A new basic probability assignment generation and combination method for conflict data fusion in the evidence theory |
title_sort | new basic probability assignment generation and combination method for conflict data fusion in the evidence theory |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10212963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37231018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35195-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tangyongchuan anewbasicprobabilityassignmentgenerationandcombinationmethodforconflictdatafusionintheevidencetheory AT zhouyonghao anewbasicprobabilityassignmentgenerationandcombinationmethodforconflictdatafusionintheevidencetheory AT renxiangxuan anewbasicprobabilityassignmentgenerationandcombinationmethodforconflictdatafusionintheevidencetheory AT sunyufei anewbasicprobabilityassignmentgenerationandcombinationmethodforconflictdatafusionintheevidencetheory AT huangyubo anewbasicprobabilityassignmentgenerationandcombinationmethodforconflictdatafusionintheevidencetheory AT zhoudeyun anewbasicprobabilityassignmentgenerationandcombinationmethodforconflictdatafusionintheevidencetheory AT tangyongchuan newbasicprobabilityassignmentgenerationandcombinationmethodforconflictdatafusionintheevidencetheory AT zhouyonghao newbasicprobabilityassignmentgenerationandcombinationmethodforconflictdatafusionintheevidencetheory AT renxiangxuan newbasicprobabilityassignmentgenerationandcombinationmethodforconflictdatafusionintheevidencetheory AT sunyufei newbasicprobabilityassignmentgenerationandcombinationmethodforconflictdatafusionintheevidencetheory AT huangyubo newbasicprobabilityassignmentgenerationandcombinationmethodforconflictdatafusionintheevidencetheory AT zhoudeyun newbasicprobabilityassignmentgenerationandcombinationmethodforconflictdatafusionintheevidencetheory |