Cargando…

A new basic probability assignment generation and combination method for conflict data fusion in the evidence theory

Dempster–Shafer evidence theory is an effective method to deal with information fusion. However, how to deal with the fusion paradoxes while using the Dempster’s combination rule is still an open issue. To address this issue, a new basic probability assignment (BPA) generation method based on the co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, Yongchuan, Zhou, Yonghao, Ren, Xiangxuan, Sun, Yufei, Huang, Yubo, Zhou, Deyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10212963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37231018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35195-4
_version_ 1785047526606372864
author Tang, Yongchuan
Zhou, Yonghao
Ren, Xiangxuan
Sun, Yufei
Huang, Yubo
Zhou, Deyun
author_facet Tang, Yongchuan
Zhou, Yonghao
Ren, Xiangxuan
Sun, Yufei
Huang, Yubo
Zhou, Deyun
author_sort Tang, Yongchuan
collection PubMed
description Dempster–Shafer evidence theory is an effective method to deal with information fusion. However, how to deal with the fusion paradoxes while using the Dempster’s combination rule is still an open issue. To address this issue, a new basic probability assignment (BPA) generation method based on the cosine similarity and the belief entropy was proposed in this paper. Firstly, Mahalanobis distance was used to measure the similarity between the test sample and BPA of each focal element in the frame of discernment. Then, cosine similarity and belief entropy were used respectively to measure the reliability and uncertainty of each BPA to make adjustments and generate a standard BPA. Finally, Dempster’s combination rule was used for the fusion of new BPAs. Numerical examples were used to prove the effectiveness of the proposed method in solving the classical fusion paradoxes. Besides, the accuracy rates of the classification experiments on datasets were also calculated to verify the rationality and efficiency of the proposed method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10212963
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102129632023-05-27 A new basic probability assignment generation and combination method for conflict data fusion in the evidence theory Tang, Yongchuan Zhou, Yonghao Ren, Xiangxuan Sun, Yufei Huang, Yubo Zhou, Deyun Sci Rep Article Dempster–Shafer evidence theory is an effective method to deal with information fusion. However, how to deal with the fusion paradoxes while using the Dempster’s combination rule is still an open issue. To address this issue, a new basic probability assignment (BPA) generation method based on the cosine similarity and the belief entropy was proposed in this paper. Firstly, Mahalanobis distance was used to measure the similarity between the test sample and BPA of each focal element in the frame of discernment. Then, cosine similarity and belief entropy were used respectively to measure the reliability and uncertainty of each BPA to make adjustments and generate a standard BPA. Finally, Dempster’s combination rule was used for the fusion of new BPAs. Numerical examples were used to prove the effectiveness of the proposed method in solving the classical fusion paradoxes. Besides, the accuracy rates of the classification experiments on datasets were also calculated to verify the rationality and efficiency of the proposed method. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10212963/ /pubmed/37231018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35195-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Tang, Yongchuan
Zhou, Yonghao
Ren, Xiangxuan
Sun, Yufei
Huang, Yubo
Zhou, Deyun
A new basic probability assignment generation and combination method for conflict data fusion in the evidence theory
title A new basic probability assignment generation and combination method for conflict data fusion in the evidence theory
title_full A new basic probability assignment generation and combination method for conflict data fusion in the evidence theory
title_fullStr A new basic probability assignment generation and combination method for conflict data fusion in the evidence theory
title_full_unstemmed A new basic probability assignment generation and combination method for conflict data fusion in the evidence theory
title_short A new basic probability assignment generation and combination method for conflict data fusion in the evidence theory
title_sort new basic probability assignment generation and combination method for conflict data fusion in the evidence theory
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10212963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37231018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35195-4
work_keys_str_mv AT tangyongchuan anewbasicprobabilityassignmentgenerationandcombinationmethodforconflictdatafusionintheevidencetheory
AT zhouyonghao anewbasicprobabilityassignmentgenerationandcombinationmethodforconflictdatafusionintheevidencetheory
AT renxiangxuan anewbasicprobabilityassignmentgenerationandcombinationmethodforconflictdatafusionintheevidencetheory
AT sunyufei anewbasicprobabilityassignmentgenerationandcombinationmethodforconflictdatafusionintheevidencetheory
AT huangyubo anewbasicprobabilityassignmentgenerationandcombinationmethodforconflictdatafusionintheevidencetheory
AT zhoudeyun anewbasicprobabilityassignmentgenerationandcombinationmethodforconflictdatafusionintheevidencetheory
AT tangyongchuan newbasicprobabilityassignmentgenerationandcombinationmethodforconflictdatafusionintheevidencetheory
AT zhouyonghao newbasicprobabilityassignmentgenerationandcombinationmethodforconflictdatafusionintheevidencetheory
AT renxiangxuan newbasicprobabilityassignmentgenerationandcombinationmethodforconflictdatafusionintheevidencetheory
AT sunyufei newbasicprobabilityassignmentgenerationandcombinationmethodforconflictdatafusionintheevidencetheory
AT huangyubo newbasicprobabilityassignmentgenerationandcombinationmethodforconflictdatafusionintheevidencetheory
AT zhoudeyun newbasicprobabilityassignmentgenerationandcombinationmethodforconflictdatafusionintheevidencetheory