Cargando…

Association of residual feed intake with intestinal microbiome and metabolome in laying period of ducks

INTRODUCTION: Residual feed intake (RFI) is a indicator to evaluate animal feed. This experiment was explored to study the relationship between intestinal microbiome and metabolome of ducks with different residual feed intake during laying period. METHODS: A total of 300 Shaoxing ducks aged 42 weeks...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Hanxue, Xu, Wenwu, Gu, Tiantian, Sun, Jing, Li, Chengfeng, Chen, Li, Tian, Yong, Li, Guoqin, Lu, Lizhi, Zeng, Tao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10213451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37250027
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1138914
_version_ 1785047626754818048
author Sun, Hanxue
Xu, Wenwu
Gu, Tiantian
Sun, Jing
Li, Chengfeng
Chen, Li
Tian, Yong
Li, Guoqin
Lu, Lizhi
Zeng, Tao
author_facet Sun, Hanxue
Xu, Wenwu
Gu, Tiantian
Sun, Jing
Li, Chengfeng
Chen, Li
Tian, Yong
Li, Guoqin
Lu, Lizhi
Zeng, Tao
author_sort Sun, Hanxue
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Residual feed intake (RFI) is a indicator to evaluate animal feed. This experiment was explored to study the relationship between intestinal microbiome and metabolome of ducks with different residual feed intake during laying period. METHODS: A total of 300 Shaoxing ducks aged 42 weeks were randomly selected and fed a diet of 60 d. At the end of the trial, 20 samples were selected according to the phenotype of RFI and divided into two groups (HRFI and LRFI). The cecal microbiota composition was explored by 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing and rectal metabolomics uses liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC–MS) to identify the composition of metabolites in a non-targeted manner. RESULTS: Results show feed intake and feed conversion ratio in the group HRFI were significantly higher than those in the group LRFI (p < 0.05). Chao1 indices were higher in the group LRFI than in the HRFI (p < 0.05), Shannon and Simpson indices were higher in the group LRFI than in the HRFI (p < 0.01). After linear discriminant analysis effect size (p < 0.05, LDA score > 3), Rikenellaceae, Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group, Lactobacillales and Ruminococcus_2, etc. were significantly enriched in the group LRFI at the genus level, while Prevotellaceae_NK3B31_group and Bacteria were significantly enriched in the group HRFI. After LC–MS analysis we found 338 metabolic difference products and 10 metabolic pathways, including the ABC transporter system, cysteine and methionine metabolism, arginine and proline metabolism, and vitamin B6 metabolism, were identified to be associated with the significantly differentially expressed between the groups LRFI and HRFI (p < 0.05). We hypothesize that the difference between ducks with different RFIs is mainly due to the fact that ducks with LRFI have more SCFAs-producing bacteria in their gut microorganisms, which regulate the RFI of animals. This process we found that Phascolarctobaterium and Anaerobiospirillum may provide energy for ABC transporter system by producing SCFAs, and regulate RFI to improve feed utilization efficiency. DISCUSSION: These results revealed the relationship between microbiome and metabonomics in laying ducks with different RFI, and provided theoretical basis for further study on the relationship between them.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10213451
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102134512023-05-27 Association of residual feed intake with intestinal microbiome and metabolome in laying period of ducks Sun, Hanxue Xu, Wenwu Gu, Tiantian Sun, Jing Li, Chengfeng Chen, Li Tian, Yong Li, Guoqin Lu, Lizhi Zeng, Tao Front Microbiol Microbiology INTRODUCTION: Residual feed intake (RFI) is a indicator to evaluate animal feed. This experiment was explored to study the relationship between intestinal microbiome and metabolome of ducks with different residual feed intake during laying period. METHODS: A total of 300 Shaoxing ducks aged 42 weeks were randomly selected and fed a diet of 60 d. At the end of the trial, 20 samples were selected according to the phenotype of RFI and divided into two groups (HRFI and LRFI). The cecal microbiota composition was explored by 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing and rectal metabolomics uses liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC–MS) to identify the composition of metabolites in a non-targeted manner. RESULTS: Results show feed intake and feed conversion ratio in the group HRFI were significantly higher than those in the group LRFI (p < 0.05). Chao1 indices were higher in the group LRFI than in the HRFI (p < 0.05), Shannon and Simpson indices were higher in the group LRFI than in the HRFI (p < 0.01). After linear discriminant analysis effect size (p < 0.05, LDA score > 3), Rikenellaceae, Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group, Lactobacillales and Ruminococcus_2, etc. were significantly enriched in the group LRFI at the genus level, while Prevotellaceae_NK3B31_group and Bacteria were significantly enriched in the group HRFI. After LC–MS analysis we found 338 metabolic difference products and 10 metabolic pathways, including the ABC transporter system, cysteine and methionine metabolism, arginine and proline metabolism, and vitamin B6 metabolism, were identified to be associated with the significantly differentially expressed between the groups LRFI and HRFI (p < 0.05). We hypothesize that the difference between ducks with different RFIs is mainly due to the fact that ducks with LRFI have more SCFAs-producing bacteria in their gut microorganisms, which regulate the RFI of animals. This process we found that Phascolarctobaterium and Anaerobiospirillum may provide energy for ABC transporter system by producing SCFAs, and regulate RFI to improve feed utilization efficiency. DISCUSSION: These results revealed the relationship between microbiome and metabonomics in laying ducks with different RFI, and provided theoretical basis for further study on the relationship between them. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10213451/ /pubmed/37250027 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1138914 Text en Copyright © 2023 Sun, Xu, Gu, Sun, Li, Chen, Tian, Li, Lu and Zeng. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Sun, Hanxue
Xu, Wenwu
Gu, Tiantian
Sun, Jing
Li, Chengfeng
Chen, Li
Tian, Yong
Li, Guoqin
Lu, Lizhi
Zeng, Tao
Association of residual feed intake with intestinal microbiome and metabolome in laying period of ducks
title Association of residual feed intake with intestinal microbiome and metabolome in laying period of ducks
title_full Association of residual feed intake with intestinal microbiome and metabolome in laying period of ducks
title_fullStr Association of residual feed intake with intestinal microbiome and metabolome in laying period of ducks
title_full_unstemmed Association of residual feed intake with intestinal microbiome and metabolome in laying period of ducks
title_short Association of residual feed intake with intestinal microbiome and metabolome in laying period of ducks
title_sort association of residual feed intake with intestinal microbiome and metabolome in laying period of ducks
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10213451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37250027
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1138914
work_keys_str_mv AT sunhanxue associationofresidualfeedintakewithintestinalmicrobiomeandmetabolomeinlayingperiodofducks
AT xuwenwu associationofresidualfeedintakewithintestinalmicrobiomeandmetabolomeinlayingperiodofducks
AT gutiantian associationofresidualfeedintakewithintestinalmicrobiomeandmetabolomeinlayingperiodofducks
AT sunjing associationofresidualfeedintakewithintestinalmicrobiomeandmetabolomeinlayingperiodofducks
AT lichengfeng associationofresidualfeedintakewithintestinalmicrobiomeandmetabolomeinlayingperiodofducks
AT chenli associationofresidualfeedintakewithintestinalmicrobiomeandmetabolomeinlayingperiodofducks
AT tianyong associationofresidualfeedintakewithintestinalmicrobiomeandmetabolomeinlayingperiodofducks
AT liguoqin associationofresidualfeedintakewithintestinalmicrobiomeandmetabolomeinlayingperiodofducks
AT lulizhi associationofresidualfeedintakewithintestinalmicrobiomeandmetabolomeinlayingperiodofducks
AT zengtao associationofresidualfeedintakewithintestinalmicrobiomeandmetabolomeinlayingperiodofducks