Cargando…

Bystanders’ reactions to animal abuse in relation to psychopathy, empathy with people and empathy with nature

Social and academic interest in animal abuse has recently increased thanks to greater awareness of the importance of biodiversity in promoting sustainability. The redefinition of human-animal relationships, in the context of the fight against speciesism and the defense of veganism, has also contribu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martín, Ana M., Vera, Andrea, Marrero, Rosario J., Hernández, Bernardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10213545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37251021
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1124162
_version_ 1785047643995504640
author Martín, Ana M.
Vera, Andrea
Marrero, Rosario J.
Hernández, Bernardo
author_facet Martín, Ana M.
Vera, Andrea
Marrero, Rosario J.
Hernández, Bernardo
author_sort Martín, Ana M.
collection PubMed
description Social and academic interest in animal abuse has recently increased thanks to greater awareness of the importance of biodiversity in promoting sustainability. The redefinition of human-animal relationships, in the context of the fight against speciesism and the defense of veganism, has also contributed to this greater attention. Moreover, public awareness of animal rights has strengthened social reactions to violence against animals, though there are still some social sectors that are indifferent to these changes. Thus, better knowledge of the psychological mechanisms underlying reactions to animal abuse could contribute to better informal, social control of such abuse. The main aim of this study is to analyze the relationships between psychopathy, empathy with people, and empathy with nature arising from people’s reactions to protected and domestic animal abuse and illegal dumping. Also, as previous studies have shown differences between men and women, both in animal abuse and in personality traits, thus gender is taken into account when analyzing these relationships. A total of 409 people, resident in a highly environmentally protected territory, participated in this study. They were aged between 18 and 82 years old and 49.9% women. Participants were asked about assigned punishments, as well as the probability of intervening personally and/or calling the police, in relation to ten scenarios, based on press releases, describing one of three types of transgression of environmental laws: abuse of protected animals, abuse of domestic animals or illegal dumping. They also responded to Spanish adaptations of the Inventory of Callous Unemotional Traits, the Basic Empathy Scale, the Dispositional Empathy with Nature Scale, and the Social Desirability Scale. Each participant was randomly given ten scenarios corresponding to just one transgression type but all the personality scales. Results show that people’s reactions were greater for abuse of domestic than protected animals or for illegal dumping, irrespective of gender. Empathy with nature was related to the reaction against animal abuse more than empathy with people and psychopathy. Results are discussed highlighting the need for future research into similarities and differences between animal abuse and other types of environmental offences, which have many victims but no single being suffering.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10213545
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102135452023-05-27 Bystanders’ reactions to animal abuse in relation to psychopathy, empathy with people and empathy with nature Martín, Ana M. Vera, Andrea Marrero, Rosario J. Hernández, Bernardo Front Psychol Psychology Social and academic interest in animal abuse has recently increased thanks to greater awareness of the importance of biodiversity in promoting sustainability. The redefinition of human-animal relationships, in the context of the fight against speciesism and the defense of veganism, has also contributed to this greater attention. Moreover, public awareness of animal rights has strengthened social reactions to violence against animals, though there are still some social sectors that are indifferent to these changes. Thus, better knowledge of the psychological mechanisms underlying reactions to animal abuse could contribute to better informal, social control of such abuse. The main aim of this study is to analyze the relationships between psychopathy, empathy with people, and empathy with nature arising from people’s reactions to protected and domestic animal abuse and illegal dumping. Also, as previous studies have shown differences between men and women, both in animal abuse and in personality traits, thus gender is taken into account when analyzing these relationships. A total of 409 people, resident in a highly environmentally protected territory, participated in this study. They were aged between 18 and 82 years old and 49.9% women. Participants were asked about assigned punishments, as well as the probability of intervening personally and/or calling the police, in relation to ten scenarios, based on press releases, describing one of three types of transgression of environmental laws: abuse of protected animals, abuse of domestic animals or illegal dumping. They also responded to Spanish adaptations of the Inventory of Callous Unemotional Traits, the Basic Empathy Scale, the Dispositional Empathy with Nature Scale, and the Social Desirability Scale. Each participant was randomly given ten scenarios corresponding to just one transgression type but all the personality scales. Results show that people’s reactions were greater for abuse of domestic than protected animals or for illegal dumping, irrespective of gender. Empathy with nature was related to the reaction against animal abuse more than empathy with people and psychopathy. Results are discussed highlighting the need for future research into similarities and differences between animal abuse and other types of environmental offences, which have many victims but no single being suffering. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10213545/ /pubmed/37251021 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1124162 Text en Copyright © 2023 Martín, Vera, Marrero and Hernández. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Martín, Ana M.
Vera, Andrea
Marrero, Rosario J.
Hernández, Bernardo
Bystanders’ reactions to animal abuse in relation to psychopathy, empathy with people and empathy with nature
title Bystanders’ reactions to animal abuse in relation to psychopathy, empathy with people and empathy with nature
title_full Bystanders’ reactions to animal abuse in relation to psychopathy, empathy with people and empathy with nature
title_fullStr Bystanders’ reactions to animal abuse in relation to psychopathy, empathy with people and empathy with nature
title_full_unstemmed Bystanders’ reactions to animal abuse in relation to psychopathy, empathy with people and empathy with nature
title_short Bystanders’ reactions to animal abuse in relation to psychopathy, empathy with people and empathy with nature
title_sort bystanders’ reactions to animal abuse in relation to psychopathy, empathy with people and empathy with nature
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10213545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37251021
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1124162
work_keys_str_mv AT martinanam bystandersreactionstoanimalabuseinrelationtopsychopathyempathywithpeopleandempathywithnature
AT veraandrea bystandersreactionstoanimalabuseinrelationtopsychopathyempathywithpeopleandempathywithnature
AT marrerorosarioj bystandersreactionstoanimalabuseinrelationtopsychopathyempathywithpeopleandempathywithnature
AT hernandezbernardo bystandersreactionstoanimalabuseinrelationtopsychopathyempathywithpeopleandempathywithnature